BBC Unearths a Hotbed of Institutional Racism-Strictly Come Dancing

With accusations of blatant left-wing bias over the Mandelson/Osboure/Oligarch affair still ringing in their ears, it might have been expected that the BBC would have wanted to keep their heads down where matters of over-zealous promotion of their liberal agenda was concerned.

But the BBC doggedly stuck to the programme today when they revealed that there is a suspected covert racist conspiracy being perpetrated by the British public. The nation’s broadcasters were said to be mortified after the last two black contestants on popular TV show Strictly Come Dancing were voted off in favour of white contestants who were said to have “two-left feet.”

This outrageous scandal began when black actor Don Warrington and black singer Heather Small from M People came bottom in the public vote last Sunday, despite getting better marks from the judges than white contestants journalist John Sergent, swimmer Mark Foster and GMTV frontman Andrew Castle.

A BBC insider told of the organisation’s horror at the poll results: “There were a lot of people at the BBC who watched in horror on Sunday night, like viewers did.

“Having two black people in the bottom two who hadn’t even performed badly was a very bad look for us.”

Complaints about the conspiracy have been apparently flooding in to the BBC’s website and there was further uproar on Strictly Come Dancing’s forum after it was besieged by angry posters, prompting the BBC to temporarily close the forum down.

Black former Olympic sprinter John Regis was in doubt as to the reason for the voting result: “Strictly is a middle-class kind of show and that possibly could be the area where racism still festers.”

In the 2007 series of the show, black ex-footballer John Barnes was in the dance off four times despite constantly getting better judge’s scores than white contestants. In 2006, BBC bosses even changed the rules of the competition after hotly fancied finalist DJ Spoony was voted off the show after just three weeks.

Spoony still seems to harbour resentment towards Strictly Come Dancing as when asked about the alleged racist voting practice he commented that it was “a big issue.”

The Equality and Human Rights Commission said it found the case “interesting” and promised to investigate the matter further if it received any complaints about the programme.

This pledge was made despite the fact that mixed-race singer Alesha Dixon actually won the competition last year and black ex-athlete Colin Jackson was runner-up in 2005.

Shock Horror! We DO Treat Islam Differently Says BBC Boss

Mark Thompson, the Director General of the BBC, has frankly admitted that his corporation does treat Islam with kid gloves due to political correctness.  Speaking at the annual public theology lecture of the religion think-tank Theos, Thompson responded to comments made by left-wing comedian Ben Elton that the BBC was scared to make jokes about Islam.

Thompson commented: “What Christian identity feels like to the broad population is a little bit different to people for whom their religion is also associated with an ethnic identity which has not been fully integrated.

“‘There’s no reason why any religion should be immune from discussion, but I don’t want to say that all religions are the same. To be a minority I think puts a slightly different outlook on it.”

Thompson’s admission would seem to bear out Elton’s criticisms of the BBC made earlier this year to Christian magazine “Third Way”:

“I believe that part of it is due to the genuine fear that the authorities and the community have about provoking the radical elements of Islam.

‘There’s no doubt about it, the BBC will let vicar gags pass but they would not let imam gags pass.  They might pretend that it’s, you know, something to do with their moral sensibilities, but it isn’t. It’s because they’re scared. I know these people.”

The BBC caused controversy recently over the screening of “Jerry Springer - The Opera” on BBC2 which featured up to 300 expletives and portrayed Jesus, Mary and God in a way that many Christians considered blasphemous, prompting over 47,000 complaints to the BBC about the programme.

The Jerry Springer Opera was criticised for its low-brow content and attacks on Christianity. Thompson claimed that the BBC would make programmes that were critical of Islam. But only if they were of “sufficient quality.”

Thompson’s admission has been greeted with anger and disbelief from Christian and media monitoring groups.  Stephen Green, director of Christian Voice, said: “Mr. Thompson seems to be saying that because Islam is a minority religion it should be treated with kid gloves.

“This is ridiculous. All religions should be treated equally and with the same approach. I think the reality is that the BBC treats coverage of Islam and Muslims differently because it is terrified of offending them. It is political correctness. The BBC is simply not bothered about offending Christians despite the majority of this country being of that faith.”

John Beyer, director of Mediawatch, commented: “All religions need to be treated in the same way, otherwise how can the BBC claim to be impartial?

“I think that any approach to religious debate and discussion that is not impartial is not what the BBC should be doing.”

Earlier this year Thompson spoke of “growing nervousness about discussion about Islam.” Perhaps we shouldn’t be too hard on the beleaguered Director General. After all, it takes a special kind of courage to admit that you’re a coward. 

BBC Favours Muslims, Say Hindus and Sikhs

In a timely reminder of the supreme irony of multiculturalist and multi-faith Britain, leaders from the Sikh and Hindu communities have complained that they are being sidelined at the expense of Islam when it comes to programming.

According to the media monitoring group of the Network of Sikh Organizations, since 2001 the BBC has made 41 programmes on Islam, five on Hinduism and one on Sikhism.

The group’s chairman, Ashish Joshi, stated “In a modern multicultural nation such as the UK, such an obvious bias from an established and internationally renowned public servant such as the BBC should not be tolerated or go unchallenged.”

The editor of the Sikh Messenger, Indarjit Singh, also felt that his community was being “brushed aside” by BBC programming and added that within the Sikh community there were concerns over “the lack of portrayal of their religion on television.”

The BBC denied the accusations and a spokesman said “in the autumn we will be covering Diwali from a Sikh perspective and we have a major new series for BBC Two in early 2009, including features on Hinduism and Sikhism.”

This is not first time that the BBC has been accused of favouritism in their portrayal of Asian matters. In 2007, the Eastern Eye newspaper accused the BBC’s Asian Network radio station of favouring Indian artists over Pakistani artists in their playlists.

This highly important matter caused something of an international stir when a spokesman for the High Commission for Pakistan in Britain joined the fray, commenting “I am concerned to hear this. The BBC needs to live up to its international reputation of being impartial and fair in its treatment.” 

It is of course interesting to note from the above stories how Sikhs and Asians in Britain seem to have a plethora of mediums that can champion their alleged “discrimination” whilst the only avenue allowed for the indigenous Britons, the BNP, is constantly discriminated against and institutionally sidelined by the media.

Biting the Hand That Has Fed Them

ISN’T it strange how those immigrants who have become influential within particular fields of our society appear to have a chip on their shoulder.

You would have thought that they would be satisfied to have risen to the top of their trade and done so well in spite of the rampant racism and insurmountable anti-immigrant bias that they tell us infects our society from top to bottom.

Take Assistant Commissioner Tarique Ghaffur for example. He’s a Ugandan Muslim immigrant who owes everything to Britain -– his education, his career and his current elevated status. Yet he is not a happy bunny and is suing his employers, the Metropolitan Police, for everything he can get, claiming that inherent racism within the Force has stopped him getting even higher up the promotional ladder.

His self-preening performance at the press conference in central London at which he launched his obscene claim was reminiscent of Yasmin Alibhai-Brown at her very worst. She is another Ugandan Muslim immigrant who has made a career as a ‘social commentator’ with The Independent and BBC by savaging the hand that feeds her and denouncing white British people as workshy, ignorant and, of course, “racist”.

But neither of them can hold a light to the great chieftain of ethnic arrogance himself –- Trevor Phillips, the supremo of the Equalities and Human Rights Commission. Before he joined the Gravy Train, Phillips claimed to be a socialist, although by sending his own children to private schools, he somewhat undermined these credentials. Now Trevor is of Guyanese parents and that country today is a cauldron of racial and religious strife, as various ethnic groups battle for supremacy, and is far from an advertisement for the joys of multiculturalism. Rather than trying to suppress the indigenous White folk of our islands, you would have thought a radical campaigner likes Phillips would have relished the challenge of promoting equality and human rights in his country of ethnic origin.

But, of course, we mustn’t blame the likes of Phillips, Ghaffur and Alibhai-Brown for this almost studied hostility towards the country and the people that have allowed them, albeit in many cases reluctantly, to make Britain their home. Their ungrateful attitude is the fault of the liberal intelligentsia and an orchestrated campaign of brainwashing by the media that everything about immigrants is “vibrant” and wonderful and that the boring old British people should be so grateful that these people have chosen to come and live amongst us.

The ethnic minorities and their cultures have been put on a pedestal by successive Labour and Conservative Governments which haven’t allowed a single word of criticism to be said against them. (I was banged up in Pentonville for three months in 1985 for voicing such criticism.)

Even when immigrants were rioting, burning down our inner cities and hacking to death with machetes PC Keith Blakelock, it wasn’t their fault — it was apparently ours — that of British society for not giving them all the opportunities they were entitled to.

The liberal agenda and a fawning media have made Trevor Phillips, Tarique Ghaffur and Yasmin Alibhai-Brown the monsters they are today. Without that help and if they’d been on a level playing field, they wouldn’t have risen through the ranks and wouldn’t have any influence.

The blame, as always, lies with Britain’s politicians of the last fifty years who have betrayed the interests of the British people. They have made us second class citizens in our own country who have to take it on the chin without comment when bullied and denounced by those whom seem to be our new masters.

Read Martin Wingfield’s blog here.

Lack of White Tax Money to Blame for Blacks Murdering Each Other, Says Sandwell Race Gestapo Chief

In the increasing anti-white frenzy which has been generated by years of Labour/Tory misrule, the lack of white taxpayer money has now been blamed for the fact that black youths are murdering each other.

The latest salvo in this anti-white campaign has been fired by Derrick Campbell (image). He is head of the bizarrely-named ‘Race Equality Sandwell’ and chairman of the ‘National Independent Advisory Group on Criminal Use of Firearms’, which is yet another of those invented ‘jobs-for-pals’ parasitical bodies which is supposed to ‘advise’ the government on race relations.

According to Campbell, politicians are “leaving black youths to die” by cutting funding to community groups. His remarks followed a particularly murderous spree by blacks which saw three deaths in 24 hours in Birmingham, Wolverhampton and London.

Campbell told the BBC that funds “earmarked for community cohesion” were not going to the right organisations.

“We have to ask the question whether there seems to be an acceptance that if another black youth is killed they are just another one that we don’t have to worry about,” Campbell, who is well known for exaggerating and distorting ‘racism’ for his own ends, said.

According to Campbell, black youth crime is not the problem of that community, but rather of the white establishment which somehow causes “(Y)oung people to be criminalised.”

Campbell went on to say there was hard evidence from community groups in the Birmingham area that their funding was being cut (as if throwing money at the problem will magically make it go away).

“Black youths within this country have been left to die. And that’s a very strong statement but it’s a statement that seems to be borne out through evidence about black youths who seem to be at the top of the list when it comes to our youngsters being killed,” he said. “Now we’re asking very serious questions of national government and local government as to why it seems that resources that have been allocated for community cohesion and other activities have not been going to those organisations.”

A Home Office spokesman said that in July the ‘government’ (i.e. the British taxpayer) had launched a £100m Youth Crime Action Plan which included enforcement and prevention measures as well as support for parents. So that is obviously not enough for Campbell, as it obviously made no difference to the increasing black crime rate.

* Campbell’s curriculum vitae, as posted on the web site, Birmingham Black History, which is supported by the Birmingham City Council, makes interesting reading.

“Through secondary schooling Derrick was always in the bottom sets as Black pupils were not allowed to be in the top sets at that time,”  it reads — an outrageous lie which has set the standard for the rest of his career, which is based on blaming whites for everything. He then says that he “went to university but was thrown out after a year,” failing to say exactly why he was thrown out, of course.

Make Room for the ‘British Asylum Seekers’

Our Black Country correspondent was interviewing some local people on one of his trips around the region. In one interview with local youngsters, our man was told that this company pictured here, a thriving ‘workwear and safety’ clothing business in West Bromwich, was ”not taking anyone on at the moment.”

The young men wondered why this was, as many people are seen coming and going. On making more detailed investigations, our correspondent was told by a source close to the on-site security that ”agency workers only” were hired. Also, these agency workers are mainly ‘immigrant workers’, therefore locals need not apply. 

As if this was not enough, while travelling around the wider English midlands region, to report back to the organiser and local BNP councillor, the second picture of “a robbery in progress” was taken. Violence with weapons in the Sandwell region, is second only to London according to a recent report.

One witness described events as ”like a scene from an American action movie,” as police cars and officers were seen dashing all over the place.

Our correspondent has been shocked by the amount of people planning to ”move to the country” because of crime, and lack of jobs for our own people. Also, many are planning to move abroad, which is sad when you realise that every western nation is now under the same pressure from immigrant led crime.

Alongside: The beautiful Arlington Row in the Cotswolds, and below, the not so beautiful devastation of our home towns.

Arlington row was so pretty, and typically English that in the early 20th Century, a wealthy American wanted to buy it, lock, stock and barrel.

This area is home to many of our ‘opponents’, and employees of the BBC.

Why are they not finding solace in the areas where the second picture was taken? With their money, fame, and oh so ‘liberal left’ attitudes, many of our 30,000 elderly people dying from cold and hunger in our Third World-like towns and cities each year, would get just the help they require, regarding money and heating facilities with such kind people ‘living next door’.

This pictorial report is meant to show the disparity between ‘real life’, and those many thousands who think they are hidden and safe deep in what is left of the British countryside.

Wealthy, anti-British politicians, financiers, and media luvvies etc., have wasted no time in living the life-style they are so publicly opposed to, whilst the rest of us have to face soaring costs, crime, and no obvious way out of all of this. 

If young men looking for ‘local work’, and others in our crime ridden towns are saying to our correspondent “we are thinking of moving to the country,” it can only mean that we now face a “British asylum seeker invasion.”      

Immigration Destroying the NHS: First Maternity Ward Closes as NHS Buckles Under Invader Birth Rate

The first — as of yet unnamed — maternity ward at a NHS hospital has been forced to shut its maternity ward for two months because staff were needed elsewhere to deliver babies from foreign-born mothers, it has been announced.

The immigration invasion has reached such heights that maternity wards have been forced to turn away expectant white British mothers because they cannot cope with soaring demand from immigrants.

An investigation by the BBC found the cost of providing maternity services for immigrants has more than doubled in only a decade to £350 million a year.

Guy Goodwin of the Office of National Statistics said: “It is clear that yesterday’s migrants as well as today’s migrants are now contributing to the net population growth we are seeing.”

High immigration has increased the number of women of childbearing age in the UK, with those aged 15 to 44 up 2% since 2001.

The number of babies born to UK-born mothers has risen by 6% in six years, to reach 529,700.

By contrast the figure for immigrant mothers leapt by 64% from 97,900 to 160,300 over the same period – accounting for two thirds of the overall increase in the nation’s birth rate.

The soaring birth rate among immigrant mothers will soon become the main driver of Britain’s rapid population growth, Government experts have predicted.

Immigration has been the biggest factor in increasing the population in recent years, and with millions of new arrivals starting families the birth rate is soaring.

The Office for National Statistics said yesterday that it could be the main source of overall population growth as early as next year, overtaking immigration itself.

Almost a quarter of all babies in Britain are now born to immigrant mothers. In London the figure is 54%, rising to 75% in some boroughs.

Foreign-born mothers have an average of 2.54 children, compared with 1.79 for women born in the UK.

In most cases a baby born in the UK acquires automatic citizenship if one parent holds a UK passport, although rules are complex. If parents have settled in Britain legally, children can secure British citizenship within a few years.

A record number of immigrants settled in the UK in the year to June 2007, topping 600,000 for the first time and helping push Britain’s population to a new high of 60,975,000, a rise of almost two million in six years.

The immigration rate of 605,000  –  double the figure when Labour came to power  –  means that on average 1,650 newcomers are settling here every day.

There are currently 6.3 million people in the UK who were born abroad – well over 10% of the population, and 1.1 million more than in 2004.

Announcing the figures, Government statisticians singled out the number of babies born to immigrants as a significant trend. It threatens to put even more pressure on public services, with schools and hospitals already struggling to cope.

A report published earlier this month revealed that one in eight pupils speaks English as a second language.

BBC Charity Gave £20K to July 7 Bomber Propagandists

The BBC’s Children in Need charity donated £20,000 to an organisation that funded the propaganda activities of the July 7 bombers. The financial support was provided between 1999 and 2002 to the Leeds Community School, which funded and shared premises with an Islamic bookshop where the suicide bombers Mohammed Siddique Khan and Shezhad Tanweer regularly met.

Siddique Khan attempted to radicalise youths by showing propaganda films at the bookshop, a focal point at the time for young Muslims.

The school in Beeston also paid for adventure weekends, such as a rafting trip to North Wales a month before the London attacks. Tanweer and Siddique Khan went on the trip, along with Khalid Khaliq, who this year was jailed for terrorism offences.

The disclosure that the school received Children in Need funding was made by the BBC Two programme Newsnight, which was told by a former employee of the school that it received hundreds of thousands of pounds from Leeds City Council and other sources.

Martin Gilbertson, an IT technician who worked at the school and the Iqra centre next door, said that he had been concerned about the activities of Tanweer and Siddique Khan. “It was like living with jihad on a daily basis,” he said of the Iqra centre, which was raided by police investigating the July 7 bombings.

See Here and Here

How DARE they?!

Folks I am livid. See this link here. Notice the WHITE hand holding the gun. Now, we don’t know what colour this lad is, but given that the overwhelming majority of gun offences amongst teenagers are commmitted by blacks, personally I would eat my hat if this boy turned out to be anything other than black. Furthermore, the area New Cross is a bit of a dead give-away. Yet the BBC, fully aware of crime statistics, choose to show a picture of this weapon being handled by a white person!

-
Update:
The bbc have removed the photo.
Here it is again - click
-

Racism and Knife Attacks

Under pressure from a shocked public, the Home Office has revealed that knife crime offences in England and Wales over the past year have totalled 22,151 — 7,409 of these in London. However, eagerly supported by the BBC, it is making great play of a supposedly 9 per cent reduction in crime recorded by the Police, with the violent crime sector being reduced by 8 per cent.

The key word here is recorded crime. It is now well known that in those areas hardest hit by crime many people are not even bothering to report burglaries or even muggings because their experience says that even if the police turn up no action will result. Overall, less than half of crimes are actually reported A secondary factor is that because of the advances made in car security by the manufacturers, car theft by amateur thieves and “joy riders” has fallen considerably, bringing the vehicle crime category down by 14 per cent, thus helping to lower the overall recorded crime rate.

It is but a further example of “smoke and mirrors” policies from a beleaguered government who have no idea how to control crime in general, let alone stop the daily murder of mainly young men on the streets of our towns and cities. It is often black upon black knife murders by teenagers, who if they reach twenty will then result to using guns.

What is worrying is the fact that a number of these murders by knifing appear to be racially motivated. But as it is whites murdered by blacks it is not considered as a racial incident by our media, certainly not the BBC. Of those murders carried out this summer, this seemed highly likely to be the case with the Sidcup murder of the young bit-part “Harry Potter” actor (two blacks arrested), and also with the murder of Ben Kinsella, brother of “EastEnders” actress Brooke Kinsella – four blacks arrested. Incidentally, it was noticeable that in the protest march of six hundred or more young people in North London, there were some black girls present giving their support, but no black boys.

In the March issue this year of Identity Nick Griffin gave us an extensive report, Racism Cuts Both Ways, on how the political elite, the media, the police and the courts are covering up an epidemic of racist violence against our long suffering indigenous people. As a result of research work by a BNP team, the article was full of facts and statistics to show how bad the situation really is. But even with the latest bout of killings (and I have only mentioned two above) , you ask a typical Joe Public to name a victim of racist violence and the only name he can give you is Stephen Lawrence, or possibly Anthony Walker. Goebbels was an amateur in the art of brainwashing compared with our modern media practitioners.

I have mentioned before in past issues a news-sheet called Combat that I used to edit in a former life. In a 1959 issue I ran a front page report headed “Blacks Go Berserk”, with a photo of a West Indian gentleman, frothing at the mouth and being held by two policemen. Of course today, having become more educated in the ways of mankind (and having read all the updates on various Race Relations Acts) I realise that I should have headed the article “Some Black People, Like Whites in General and Not Necessarily Descendants of Vikings, Go Berserk”.

My article was actually based on two reports from the London Metropolitan Police and the West Midlands Police which at that time had expressed concern in the growing number of crimes of violence being carried out by some newly arrived West Indians. The rate per head of population was something like four times that committed by the indigenous Brits.

Many West Indians at that time were God-fearing people who formed the then typical family units. Today, many of these black boys involved in street crimes, including murder, do not have a father to control them, and no doubt some have inherited those genes of violence. As for police reports, well they stopped taking ethnicity into account long, long ago, even before Stephen Lawrence was born.

The above is an extract from John Bean’s Nationalist Notebook in the August issue of Identity which you can subscribe to here.

Next Page »