Sharia law, no change

Tue, 30/10/2012 - 06:00
Share this

By Northernscot-Thank goodness for people like Lady Cox. The Sharia law debate in the House of Lords

Not that the national press gave this debate much notice.

But Independent crossbencher Lady Cox in the House of Lords raised the issue of Sharia Courts being held in our Country.
Just days ago, she warned of the “suffering of women oppressed by religiously sanctioned gender discrimination in this country”.

She was trying to tackle such problems in the Arbitration and Mediation Services (Equality) Bill debate.

Lady Cox denied being anti-Muslim.
However, Muslim Peer, Baroness Uddin, said the bid to change the law would be seen, outside the House, as “another assault on Muslims”.

She also stated “No laws should supersede the laws of the land where citizens reside and coercion to religious law is unacceptable”.

Firstly, we have to wonder readers, why would it be an assault on Muslims? There is no need or should there be to allow Sharia Courts in our land.

Lady Cox quite rightly responded and said that problems arose because many women believed Sharia courts were “real courts” and they did not have rights under English law or were “pressured” not to seek those rights.

She went on to point out that such women lived in fear and dare not speak out about problems of domestic violence and gender discrimination.

Her Bill would make it a criminal offence “falsely to claim legal jurisdiction” and make it easier to have discriminatory rulings overturned, as well as strengthening against domestic violence.

Lady Cox then said “I don’t believe we can continue with the present situation where so many women are suffering from gender discrimination in our country today, in ways that would make the suffragette movement turn in their graves”.

Lord Kalms of Edgware stated
“The substance of the Bill is straightforward, and it should be acceptable to all Members of this House.

It is this, that the law of the land is, and must remain, paramount; no law should ever override or sit above the law of this land; and, while amendments can and will be made to our laws, the fundamental bedrock principles on which our legal system is based not only cannot but must not be open for negotiation.

Among our absolutely non-negotiable principles must be the principle of equity before the law. This hard-fought-for conception of one law for all remains among the greatest achievements not only of our country but of humankind. Any court not abiding 100% by the law of the land has no more status than a kangaroo court”.

And in conclusion,
“Today this House has an opportunity to make a stand and draw a firm line. It should be this: that no British citizen should ever sit before a court or judge whose basic principles are in opposition to the most cherished principles of this country and its law.

Whether we have the confidence to draw this line clearly will not only affect the issue of integration in this country, it will send out a signal about the kind of country we and our children would wish to live in”.

Lord Gardner of Kimble, in response said
"That the Government are fully committed to protecting the rights of all citizens, and there is legislation in place to uphold those rights.

What I said earlier is that the Government are actively working with groups to ensure that there is awareness and a change of attitude”.

So there we are, the official line is no change.

The problem does not exist, close your eyes and you won’t be troubled. If only more Peer’s stood by Lady Cox, then just maybe the House of Lords would be better respected.

The Government line is a cave in. One that allows an alien law system to operate. We believe in one legal system that protects the innocent and punishes the law breaker, English and Scots law.

To allow any form of Sharia law courts to operate is pandering to the Muslim community.

There would be absolutely no chance of Westerner’s moving on mass in to Islamic lands and demanding British courts. We would be driven out or worst. Yet we continue to allow a pre medieval legal system to operate in the background.

We, the British are the people of this land. We the Scots, Welsh, English and Irish are the generations that laws have been built around for centuries. It is for immigrants who decide that they want our wealth to abide under ONE LAW, and ONE LAW ONLY.

That is the legal law of this land. There is no place for Sharia Law courts.


Please read our posting guidelines before posting a comment

If you liked this news article, please donate online or by ringing 0844 8094581 to help with running costs and improvements of this website. If operators are busy, please try again.

Having trouble posting your comment? Do you want help or have feedback about the usability of this website? If so, then please visit http://www.bnp.org.uk/feedback/website

Related Articles

No related items were found.

 

Join today from just £2.50 per month:

OAP - £2.50 per month
UNWAGED - £2.50 per month
STANDARD - £4.60 per month
FAMILY - £5.58 per month
GOLD - £8.75 per month
OVERSEAS - £8.75 per month
PLATINUM (GOLD + Newspaper)- £10.41 per month
OVERSEAS GOLD - £10.41 per month
OVERSEAS PLATINUM - £12.98 per month

 

Salutation:

First Name:

Last Name:

Email:

Phone No:

 

Get Active
Membership
Donate
Sign up for news

See video

Twitter Updates