Tory leader slammed as phoney by Nick Griffin - "There was no ´new Treaty´ on the table, so how could Cameron veto it? Behind all the excited media bluster and Tory spin, that´s the crux of the matter " This is Nick Griffin´s analysis of  the real news from the latest one of an endless series of ´make or break´ Euro summits.

Mr. Griffin´s analysis continues in the important article below:

There´s nothing complicated in all this. The cat was let out of the bag by Petr Necas, the Prime Minister of the Czech Republic, when he said that "Right now there is not much more than a blank sheet of paper."

Mr. Necas went on to say that "even the name of the future treaty might still change" and added that "I think that it would be politically short-sighted to come out with strong statements that we should sign that piece of paper".

Herman Van Rompuy, President of the European Council, effectively backed up this analysis when he merely defined what changes might be needed to the treaty, setting out his "general political objectives".

Far from Cameron´s mythical treaty being ready to sign, Van Rompuy proposed holding a Council meeting in March to give a mandate for limited change to the Lisbon Treaty (remember that one, the document that David Cameron said made so little difference that no referendum was needed before adopting it?) followed by an Inter-Governmental Conference to draft the amendments.

Nothing to veto = No veto!

So there has been no veto, because there was nothing to veto. It is impossible to veto ´general political objectives´, Mr. Cameron merely walked out of another talking shop.

It´s another Cameron lie, just like his broken referendum promise; just like his pre-election tough talk on immigration and getting tough with criminals.

Most of the moves vaguely proposed to create an EU fiscal union will happen piecemeal through existing machinery over the next year or so, and there is nothing that Cameron or anyone else can do to stop them hitting Britain - except for giving us our promised referendum and then doing what the majority want and getting Britain out of the European Union completely.

That, of course, is something that David Cameron will never do, not even the referendum, let alone withdrawal and the restoration of our freedom.

The bright news shining through all the controlled media deceit and Tory spin is that the latest EU sticking plaster, with its promises of all (except Britain) being determined to come up with something at sometime in the future, has done nothing more than buy a few more days in which market speculators can make a bit more money as various financial sector gambling casinos roll the dice and spin their wheels of misfortune a few more times.

Euro still sinking

Within a couple of weeks at most, the realisation will set in that nothing has changed. The Euro is still a sinking ship. It´s not at all certain that there will even be a unified Eurozone by March. There has to be at least a 20% chance that Greece will be forced out over Christmas (a good time to change currencies in a hurry, because the banks and the stock markets and the money exchanges are all shut). And if Greece goes then the contagion will topple other dominoes in the line too.

When that happens, David Cameron´s latest publicity stunt will rapidly become just another footnote. We´ll see which he really values most then, Eurosceptic votes or the backing of his Bilderberg friends. On past Tory practice, and from his own track record, the voters will count for nothing.

The problem for both Cameron and for his openly Europhile friends, is that the great plan of the architects of the United Europe Project was to use the crisis they knew was inevitable from the start as the excuse for total fiscal union. But they expected that the crisis would be a relatively minor one, caused by different economic speeds within the Eurozone countries.

They never bargained for the fact that the ´benevolent crisis´ caused by Germans being a tad more industrious than the Greeks would become intimately and inextricably intertwined with a global debt crisis caused by fundamental contradictions and corruption at the heart of the international capitalist banking system.

The whole thing is out of control. There is no solution except withdrawal from the Euro combined with default and an Icelandic style wiping out of the debts. That is the answer, our answer, the only answer. It´s simple, just and entirely practical.

People or System?

The banks and Europhiles must be made to pay the price for what they have done in their Gaderene pursuit of power and profit. The peoples of Europe can survive without the system, but the system cannot survive, with or without them.

So what will happen? The Europhiles cannot build their fiscal union unless they bring in complete economic dictatorship, install blatant puppet governments in half a dozen more countries and crush the coming protests against their self-defeating, vicious circle austerity measures by force.

If they do that, they might just manage to hang on to power. They probably would if all their subject nations were like quiet, mild-mannered England or the obedient, guilt-ridden German milch-cow, but frankly I don´t rate their chances against the Italians, Spaniards and French. 

But even if the Eurocrats provoke and win the low-level continent-wide civil war that would involve, the image of the EU as a well-meaning if rather extravagant folly would die in the gutter along with demonstrators and democracy alike.

If they do not do it, then the Euro will collapse, perhaps taking the entire Project down with it (though if the Europhiles haven´t got the guts for a real fight then they may back off, regroup and try again with creeping constitutional federalism as the new motor in place of their broken economic one).

If they go down the road to repression, then the European Union as Utopian Project will be finished. All that will be left will be the struggle between naked dictatorship and freedom reborn.