5th March 2008: A Date Which Will Live in Infamy

Yesterday 311 Parliamentary parasitic traitors defecated on our democracy by denying the British people a vote on their own future – they did so for no other reason than they knew they would lose any such vote. They have wantonly defrauded the public of their say, in the same way many of them defraud the public of their tax money! It must now be clear, even to the densest of our fellow citizens, that this country is being run by a shower of liars, thieves and traitors.

A report in today’s Daily Mail is worth reading:

It begins:

“Yesterday will go down in history as the day our politicians surrendered most of what was left of Britain’s sovereignty and trusted the nation’s future to a European superstate.

It will also go down as one of the blackest ever for our democracy.

With honourable exceptions - though far too few to affect the result - both Government and opposition MPs deliberately broke the solemn pledge they made to the electorate in 2005.

Every Labour candidate went into that election committed to an unequivocal pledge to call a referendum on what was then called the EU Constitutional Treaty - now known, after a few cosmetic tweaks, as the Lisbon Treaty.

Their manifesto said: “It is a good treaty for Britain and for the new Europe. We will put it to the British people in a referendum and campaign wholeheartedly for a “Yes” vote to keep Britain a leading nation in Europe.”

Not much room for misunderstanding there, was there?”

The rest of this article may be read here .

The way to defeat the Lisbon Treaty is through a Constitutional challenge - not climbing cranes!

It has been reported in the news today that two protesters have climbed a crane adjacent to the House of Commons to protest over the refusal of the lying Labour Government to make good on their manifesto promise to hold a referendum. However, as numerous visitors to this site have pointed out, they and a great many other people demanding a referendum on the traitorous Lisbon Treaty (88% of the population according to some news reports), are missing the point.

The point being that the Lisbon Treaty is an act of treason within the meaning of various Acts of Constitutional legislation – some of which we have previously detailed on this site. It follows from that that to demand a referendum on an act of treason is to compound the treason!

The following short article explains the implication.

Quote: This provision of the Treason Act 1702 is the important one, as it states that treason may be defined as meaning that any person who signs away the power of the crown over the territory of the realm, with dominion also meaning the APPLICATION OF THE POWER of the royal prerogative over Britain itself.

Dominions and territories applies not just to the Commonwealth but also Britain itself.

The Crown is not just the person of the Queen or King, it is the power of the Crown in Parliament and thre power of the Royal Prerogative.

The imperial crown represents the sovereignity of the Crown in this country, meaning the power of the Crown is the ultimate authority of Parliament and the Royal Prerogative.

Power may not be lawfully excercised unless done through the Crown.

Treason is therefore done when a Minister of the Crown signs a treaty that permanentaly revokes the power of the Crown as excercised via Parliament or through the Royal Prerogative in Britain. This is because they have signed a treaty that ensures the Crown no longer has the exlusive authority to apply the Royal Prerogative in those areas defined in the treaty AFTER THE PRESENT QUEEN ABDICATES, as it from henceforth binds all her successors, and therefore makes the Crown subservient to the EU. This is also confirmed by the fact that Parliament may no longer prevent foreign judges from imposing laws directly upon British citizens simply by bypassing Parliament and the Crown.

In previous treaties the power of the Crown was said to be operated in the name of the Crown via the EU and that the authority of the EU laws was based on them being produced as a result of this shared control of the power of the Crown and the Prerogative with the EU. The government allowed the EU to enact laws in the name of the Crown via the EU treaties and this meant those laws becme laws in the UK under the authority of the Crown.

The EU did not permamently revoke the power of the Crown but excercised the power of the Crown in the name of the Crown via the EU. This treaty though removes and surrenders totally the power of the Crown over those areas defined in the treaty and hands full power over exclusively in perpetuity to the EU. That is a fundamental legal shift.

The Reform treaty removes the power of the Crown and Royal Prerogative from the Crown and hands it to the EU.

Therefore the Reform Treaty binds the next monarch, and makes the Crown subservient to the EU and the EU judges. This means the Crown loses sovereign control of British territory and British dominions.

This means the act is treason.” Unquote.

So instead of chasing a referendum that Gordon Brown’s EU collaborationist puppet regime is never going to agree to, the Eurosceptic lobby would be best advised to pool their resources and to challenge the legality of the Lisbon Treaty within the context of our existing Constitutional legislation in our courts! Either Constitutional law has been revoked or the Lisbon Treaty is treason! That is the way forward your news team suggests

BBC Traitors cross the line!

From Today’s Sun Newspaper:

THE BBC is to accuse the most highly decorated battalion in the Army of torturing and executing six Iraqi prisoners in cold blood. The allegations include claims that a 14-year-old boy was garrotted and a man was shot point-blank in the head. Flagship programme Panorama will claim the prisoners were murdered after being captured during a bloody battle in 2004.

The shootout, dubbed the Battle of Danny Boy after a checkpoint where it took place, saw the first bayonet charge in 20 years. Soldiers from the 1st Battalion, the Princess of Wales’s Royal Regiment won a Conspicuous Gallantry Cross and two Military Crosses for their bravery.

The accusations, to be aired on Monday, have caused fury among top brass who believe they were fabricated by militants to embarrass the British Government.

Investigations by both the Royal Military Police and International Red Cross have found NO atrocities had taken place. And a senior defence source said: “What the BBC are going to do is a disgrace.”

In six months in Iraq 1PWRR lost two dead, 48 wounded and won 30 medals – including a VC earned by L/Cpl Johnson Beharry two weeks before Danny Boy. There is no suggestion of any allegations involving him.

The claims have been made by nine fighters from the fanatical Medhi Army, who have taken on antiwar lawyer Phil Shiner to push their case in Britain. The battle erupted near hotspot town Majar al Kabir when a company from 1PWRR went to the rescue of an underfire unit. As the ambushers were well hidden in deep ditches, Our Boys assaulted them with bayonets.

Afterwards 20 enemy dead were taken back to base. The Iraqis claim six were still alive on arrival but executed overnight, with a boy strangled. A BBC spokesman insisted the programme was still under discussion, adding: “We are examining a range of things.”

Tory MP Patrick Mercer, an ex-Army officer, said: “It is totally unacceptable.”

MPs’ debate on EU treaty is a scandal

 

To describe the examination(?) of the Lisbon Treaty currently taking place in the, ‘House of Commons’, as a debate, would be a misnomer. For few of them can even be bothered to turn up. And those that do are not truly ‘examining’ and amending the bill to incorporate this Treaty into British Law.

Nevertheless, the abrogation of duty by those entrusted with great responsibilities, elected Members of the British Parliament, is without doubt a genuine National Scandal! The Government, might well be hell bent on destroying our Sovereignty, for they are unashamed Traitors to the country and to their oaths of office. But there are over 600 MP’s and collectively, they could force the government to debate such a vital piece of legislation in a proper manner.

But do they? Is Ian Paisley a Catholic??? Of course not. These MP’s too betray their oaths, by not being truly, ‘Honourable Members’! Are they simply lily livered, are they simply not interested, or are they willfully refusing their duty?

An article by Paul Johnson, copied below, gives additional insight into what has been happening within the Palace of Westminster. And what has been happening is quite simply scandalous!

  MPs’ debate on EU treaty is a scandal

The House of Commons is about one third of the way through its debate on the Treaty of Lisbon. Have you noticed? You could say this is the media’s fault for obsessing about MPs’ expenses and the politics of another country. But the parliamentarians themselves are hardly enamoured of their own discussion.

A glance around the chamber on the fourth day of the 12-day “debate” was to find 30 to 40 MPs at most, with many of the usual suspects in their places. One reason for this is the way the Government has deliberately organised the business in order to diminish its importance and to avoid the procedural trench warfare that characterised the Maastricht debates 15 years ago.

It has achieved it through rewriting the rules that guide the way the Commons deals with legislation. Most people know how a Bill usually progresses through Parliament. It is published (the first reading), the measure’s general intent is debated (the second reading) and then the Bill’s details are considered, line by line, in a standing committee.

When a Bill has constitutional implications - as ratifying the Treaty of Lisbon clearly does - its committee stages are taken in the chamber itself.

The purpose of the committee stage is to test the legislation for flaws and weaknesses; to explore aspects that could cause difficulties for those seeking to implement it or for the courts wishing to interpret it; and, especially where an international treaty is concerned, to ensure it does not disadvantage the United Kingdom and that its consequences are fully understood.

Conventionally, this is done by tabling amendments to specific clauses and debating them in fine detail.

But this is not happening and it is a scandal. It is proof of the supine nature of national parliaments within the EU.

After signing the treaty in December, Gordon Brown said: “Parliament will now have an opportunity to debate this amending treaty in detail and decide whether to implement it. We will ensure that there is sufficient time for debate on the floor of the House, so that the Bill can be examined in the fullest detail and all points of view can be heard.”

As with the referendum, this is another promise Mr Brown has not fulfilled. Instead, 12 days have been allotted for the committee stage and each day has a subject for a four-and-a-half hour general debate decided by ministers.

So far, these topics have included energy policy, the single market and justice and home affairs. The traditional line-by-line scrutiny of the legislation has been squeezed into 90 minutes at the end of each day, so many aspects of the treaty are not being debated.

When Mr Brown was challenged about this in the Commons last week, he said: “We are considering the European Union (Amendment) Bill day by day in the House of Commons in great detail.”

Day by day, but not line by line. The cynicism is breathtaking. During the 2005 general election campaign, the Government deflected any serious debate on the EU constitution by insisting the issue would be discussed fully during the referendum it had promised in its manifesto.

Now it has circumscribed the opportunity that MPs have to debate a matter of the utmost constitutional importance.

But what is public opinion where the “ever closer union” envisaged in the Treaty of Rome is concerned? The people or their representatives are ignored, lied to, treated with contempt and generally considered an irksome impediment to the ambitions of an arrogant political elite.

On Friday, the French parliament ratified the treaty that its own people had emphatically rejected. two years ago. Unlike our government, at least the French concede that the treaty is virtually the same as the old constitution. Only Ireland will now hold a referendum; and if the Irish vote “no” it can be guaranteed they will be marched back to the polling stations, as they were once before, to give the correct answer.

Leaving aside the procedural jiggery-pokery, the treaty’s ramifications would still not be clear even if there were a line-by-line committee stage. Take but one example. Article 61 states: “A standing committee shall be set up within the Council in order to ensure that operational cooperation on internal security is promoted and strengthened within the Union.”

This sounds unexceptionable. Yet what is envisaged here is a powerful new EU interior department, called the Standing Committee on Internal Security (COSI).

When MPs recently debated the treaty’s justice and home affairs provisions, Jacqui Smith, the Home Secretary, did not even mention COSI. She sought to define this aspect of the treaty solely in terms of enhanced cross-border cooperation against crime and terrorism, as though that cannot be achieved without setting up an EU Interior Ministry that will rival, or exceed, her own department in importance.

Internal EU documents uncovered by our Brussels correspondent indicate how COSI might develop. One discussion paper states: “Internal security should at least include… the prevention and combating of crime, the prevention of the terrorist threat, intelligence exchange, public order management, the prevention and combating of criminal offences such as illegal immigration and trafficking in persons, the provision of an integrated management system for external borders and crisis management with cross-border effects within the EU.”

The EU already has an embryonic police force (Europol), a courts arm (Eurojust), a paramilitary riot squad (European Gendarmerie Force), a European Arrest Warrant, and will now, under Lisbon, have a European public prosecutor and what could become an interior ministry (COSI) to pull it all together.

For many years, these matters were regarded as off limits for the EU. Yet with the barest of debate in our supposedly sovereign parliament, and with ministers clinging to the fraying life-line of their negotiated opt-outs, we are about to hand control of our criminal justice system to the European Commission and the European Court of Justice.

Some people have argued against a referendum because we are a parliamentary democracy and the proper place for debating these matters is the Commons. What are they thinking now, or does nobody care any more?

Introducing “Traitorsgate”

As from today we shall be launching a news initiative to be known as “Traitorsgate” – so-named for reasons that will shortly become obvious.

Articles published under “Traitorsgate” will concern themselves with Westminster’s treasonous collusion with the EU, in the same way that “Allowancesgate” concerns itself with issues of Westminster abuses of Parliamentary privilege, commonly perceived as fraud.

It should also be noted that we use the term “traitors” in connection with Parliament, not as a term of abuse, but as an appellation of absolute fact! Today we present a brief article that outlines the Treason Act of 1702 and its relevance to the treasonous Lisbon “Constitutional Reform” Treaty.

The provision of the Treason Act 1702 is the important one, as it states that treason may be defined as meaning that any person who signs away the power of the Crown over the territory of the realm or dominion; also meaning the APPLICATION OF THE POWER of the Royal Prerogative over Britain itself.

Dominions and territories apply not just to the Commonwealth but also Britain itself.

The Crown is not just the person of the Queen or King; it is the power of the Crown in Parliament and the power of the Royal Prerogative. The imperial crown represents the sovereignty of the Crown in this country, meaning the power of the Crown is the ultimate authority of Parliament and the Royal Prerogative.

Power may not be lawfully be exercised unless done through the Crown. Treason is therefore done when a Minister of the Crown signs a treaty that permanently revokes the power of the Crown as exercised via Parliament or through the Royal Prerogative in Britain. This is because they have signed a treaty that ensures the Crown no longer has the exclusive authority to apply the Royal Prerogative in those areas defined in the treaty AFTER THE PRESENT QUEEN ABDICATES, as it from henceforth binds all her successors, and therefore makes the Crown subservient to the EU.

This is also confirmed by the fact that Parliament may no longer prevent foreign judges from imposing laws directly upon British citizens simply by bypassing Parliament and the Crown.

In previous treaties the power of the Crown was said to be operated in the name of the Crown via the EU and that the authority of the EU laws was based on them being produced as a result of this shared control of the power of the Crown and the Prerogative with the EU. The government allowed the EU to enact laws in the name of the Crown via the EU treaties and this meant those laws became laws in the UK under the authority of the Crown.

The EU did not permanently revoke the power of the Crown but exercised the power of the Crown in the name of the Crown via the EU. This treaty though removes and surrenders totally the power of the Crown over those areas defined in the treaty and hands full power over exclusively in perpetuity to the EU. That is a fundamental legal shift.

The Reform treaty removes the power of the Crown and Royal Prerogative from the Crown and hands it to the EU. Therefore the Reform Treaty binds the next monarch, and makes the Crown subservient to the EU and the EU judges. This means the Crown loses sovereign control of British territory and British dominions.

This means the Reform Treaty is treason and those British citizens who support, promote and implement it are traitors!

---

We need your help!

Support the British National Party: Click the button below to make a donation and a difference…

---