News Archive

Welcome To Labour’s Sicko Friendly Britain


Regular visitors to this site will be only too aware of our frequent reports on paedophile activity within the Labour Party – with news items relating to their councillors and officials being arrested, charged and convicted in connection with paedophile offences – most commonly downloading child porn – being posted with monotonous regularity. The Labour Party, of course, is infamous in that many of its MPs thieve from the taxpayer on a daily basis in “iffy” allowances and expenses claims - not to mention deliberately inflated constituency office rents!

Visitors can find a selection of “interesting” news reports relating to Labour (and Tory, Lib-Dems and UKIP) people, from just the last six months, or so, here .

Bearing in mind Labour’s apparent pro-paedo disposition, media reports - such as the one we are about to refer you to – should come as no surprise in a country having representatives of this odious party as its government.

The Labour regime, it would appear, believes that paedo’s have rights that we, the public, should respect! The BNP has other ideas on the subject, not least that our kids should have the right to enjoy their childhood – free from the threat of such evil.

We quote:

A MUM has been told to stay away from a mall so the child sex pervert who abused her daughter is free to do his weekend shopping there.

James Bryson - who had charges of raping the five-year-old dropped when he pleaded guilty to other horrifying sex attacks on her - was freed on Thursday.

The girl’s mum was horrified to find he was moving near her family and social workers had agreed he could have “shopping access” to her local centre at weekends.

Last night, the furious mum said she had been told Bryson, who served 40 months of an five-year sentence, had to have his human rights protected.

The woman, who cannot be named to protect the identity of her daughter, now 10, said: “It’s bad enough he’s out.

“But then I found out he was living just five minutes away from us.

“And I was told his conditions allowed him to use the local shops at weekends so I was advised not to go there or I risked meeting him.

“It’s a horrific situation for us and makes me feel sick.

“The social worker who came to my house said it was to do with his human rights. I couldn’t believe what I was hearing.”

Former pub bouncer Bryson, 31, originally from Possil, Glasgow, was released from high-security Peterhead Prison this week. Unquote.

The full article from the Daily Herald may be read here .

Share this page:

Add to del.icio.us Add to Diggit Add to Yahoo Add to Google Add to StumbleUpon Add to Facebook Add to MySpace
What do these buttons do?

Discussion

39 comments for “Welcome To Labour’s Sicko Friendly Britain”

  1. A most uncomfortable subject to speak of.

    But you would be amazed how many people, and in particular men, have been abused as children.

    Hush, Hush-

    Many of the people who I have spoken to have been abused by care workers in children’s homes run by Labour Councils. The vast majority of care workers are decent and caring people. However the paedophiles infiltrate these centres, youth clubs and care homes at an alarming rate.

    The CRB check they use only goes back 10 years - prior to this previous convictions do not count.

    I have a friend who is a nurse. He has told me that the vast majority of attacks are from CRB checked individuals.

    What is truly shocking is that all the victims share the same feelings - they blame themselves.

    Posted by topmarqueswales | July 20, 2008, 2:14 pm
  2. Just how sick can this country get? If it’s not tribal warfare in London now some sick pervert has more rights than the victim, This cannot be allowed to continue. I hope a few peace-loving Glaswegians just bump into him while out shopping and tell him what they think?

    Posted by robstew48 | July 20, 2008, 2:44 pm
  3. What is it with liblabconners and kiddy-fiddling?

    Posted by Dylan | July 20, 2008, 2:48 pm
  4. I read recently about a grandmother in Australia, who took a gun and blew off the ‘dangley bits’ of her granddaughter’s rapist.
    I remember thinking ‘good on yer girl’. I don’t know what became of her, but she deserves a gold medal!

    -

    True, and she was discharged by the court I think - Ed

    Posted by THELMA H | July 20, 2008, 3:38 pm
  5. This story doesn’t surprise me at all, the Labour party is sick in the head!

    Posted by SimonGB | July 20, 2008, 5:11 pm
  6. With Labour (and the Libs and Cons for that matter), any deviant behaviour that undermines the normal, civilised, decent standards that most of us expect in society is to be supported. It beggars belief, but it’s true.

    We must all do what we can to right the balance back in favour of the decent majority, and punish the sickos who currently hurt our children with impunity and laugh in the face of broken-hearted parents:

    Join the Resistance. Join the British National Party.

    Posted by Legend | July 20, 2008, 5:49 pm
  7. This truly horrific story comes as no surprise to me. This heathen “government” seems to take great delight in ruining the lives of our young people. As an example that stalwart of law and order the totally useless Jack Smith (who’s in charge of security in this country)is at present trying to rid this country of knife crime, a gink like her trying to rid this country of knife crime? Is Bean having a laugh? I wouldn’t let her see my kids across the road. Her inability to deal with crime in this country is doing a disservice to everyone involved in it from the perpetrators to the victims, they need strong no nonsense leadership step forward one Jack Smith….. Be afraid, be very afraid.

    Posted by maurice oatley | July 20, 2008, 5:57 pm
  8. “Human rights” for criminals is all part of the LibLabConspirators implementation of the Frankfurt School/Common Purpose project to “deconstruct” Western civilisation so that democracy - what little is left of it - can be supplanted by an unelected, irremovable, Cultural Marxist dictatorship, as exemplified by the EUSSR and its Soviet-replica constitution.

    All I can add to that is that James Bryson’s luck extends far beyond the Common Purpose-graduate social worker’s defence of his right to go shopping and laugh in the face of his victim’s mother. His greatest good fortune, by far, is that I am not his victim’s father.

    Posted by Noel | July 20, 2008, 6:31 pm
  9. Welcome to sicko britain indeed. Paedophilia is being downgraded on a daily basis. This is being done because there many sexual pervert members in the three main parties. Also to allow a certain middle eastern religion no doubt. As this practice is prolific within it.
    If they had their way the Liblabcon crime syndicate would make Hetrosexual marriage illegal and call it perverse.

    Posted by baz | July 20, 2008, 7:24 pm
  10. “His greatest good fortune, by far, is that I am not his victim’s father.”

    Well said, Noel. I’m sure all visitors to this site share your sentiment.

    Posted by Legend | July 20, 2008, 7:27 pm
  11. Although I don’t want to imply that all New Labour voters are as bad as paedophiles, if they know of this story but still vote for them, well they’re not much better.

    How long before “paedophobe” becomes part of the trendy liberal lexicon?

    Posted by the likes of us | July 20, 2008, 7:47 pm
  12. All those who had a look at the David Icke video linked to a comment on an earlier article will remember what he said about the Powers That Be controlling both sides of an artificial confrontation to dictate the outcome. Here is another example. The EU is getting behind various efforts to combat paedophilia rings, such as a policy paper in July 2006 covering EU strategy on the rights of the child and the adoption of procedures for dealing with alleged child abuse in its creches etc. etc., probably directed at innocent relations and carers like the mum in the taxi with her epileptic child having to undergo a CRB check, also mentioned in an earlier article. However, at the same time and inexplicably, except from the standpoint of David Icke, the EU is on line to legalise paedophilia in all its rank glory and honour the human rights of paedophiles. The following links will show the way in which EU member countries and the EU spider itself continue to support the other side of the “debate”:

    http://www.tpuc.org/node/151
    http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2002/nov/27/childprotection.uk
    http://the-tap.blogspot.com/2007/09/portugal-paedophiles-operate-unchecked.html
    http://tapestrytalks.typepad.com/tapestry_talks/2007/09/the-mccanns-nee.html
    http://newtline.wordpress.com/2007/12/06/olof-palme-suspected-of-paedophilia/
    http://www.europa.bg/en/htmls/page.php?id=5721&category=5

    The majority non-paedophiles will eventually become so outraged and desperate that they will welcome the intrusion of the state and beg it to take action with the same sort of draconian measure as we saw in the 42-day detention bill against terrorists. The result can only be an intensification of state control and our political emasculation for “the good of our children” and who, in their “right minds”, will be able to object to that? Thus, all right-thinking individuals will be trapped and forced to walk down the maze outlet dictated for it, happy in the thought that they’re protecting their children, but only at the expense of depriving themselves of their own liberty and freedom. We will become ever more wary of having even the most innocent contact with our own children, thus breaking down the family even more and giving our children even less of a loving secure base to stand on, and suspicion and sneaking will become the rule of the day.

    However, we should remember that this is an artificial debate. Paedophiles do not have any rights. They relinquished them as soon as they started to put their sick thoughts into practice and impinged on the human rights of the innocent. In any sane society the human rights of the innocent trump those of the guilty and I can’t wait for the day when the BNP is in power and can bring that sane society into being.

    Posted by SheriffofNottingham | July 20, 2008, 8:21 pm
  13. Posted by Dylan | July 20, 2008, 8:39 pm
  14. There are NO excuses for this crime - HANG THEM!

    Posted by White Lion | July 20, 2008, 8:42 pm
  15. Years ago in this country, two of the most important things, a sort of unwritten law, was that the elderly and children were guarded and looked after. What a difference a few decades make where paedophiles and the like manage to get into leading positions in councils, schools, churches, and not least of all into the government and opposition parties. The same thing applies to homosexuals. I have to admit that although there are laws now to make me accept it, I just cannot and personally don’t care what people do in their own homes as long as it doesn’t interfere with me, but I object strongly to having it pushed into my face. But the point I want to make is that as with paedophiles, homosexuals have reached high position to influence laws etc. for their own gains, however unnatural it is. The other way that they get their way is by means of money. It is surprising how well off a lot of these people are. It is my personal point of view that these types need to be dealt with by using the strongest [not robust as taught by CP] methods available i.e. chemical sterilisation and the like. The left-wing halfwits have had their way for too long and society has broken down, working against the honest, decent, hard-working folk of this country and it’s time to come down hard on all those practicing these unnatural practices. Failure to do so will result in the rise of vigilantes, but then again politicians never make good decisions, they just waffle and sit on the fence allowing one problem to get out of hand and multiply.

    Posted by JIM GREEN | July 20, 2008, 9:28 pm
  16. I just checked my dictionary for clarification of the term ‘democracy’ - I then checked Zanu labour’s track record, and now I’m very confused! As a nonce’s sick genes, or hideously diseased minds are as incurable as HIV or cancer, but decidedly more infectious to a decent society, (I feel I need not provide more proof to this?) but with the help of pathetic social workers and the “good for us all” HR act, the only cure for such society ills is a hemp necktie with a fancy but practical knot! We are all conditioned to accept ‘modern’ & ‘progressive’ claptrap as good, but traditional/old fashioned or out-dated as unacceptable, but I know what will actually work for society, and it’s not the liberal, drug-induced hippy drivel coming from the limp labour freeloaders! I often actually wonder what the street level Police (and not their promotion-hungry bosses who would sell their very souls, if they had any, for a grade rise) would tell us if their political gag was ever allowed to be taken off? They must be so frustrated, as we all are, and I’m sure it’s not what most of them really signed up for?

    Posted by proudhonkey | July 20, 2008, 9:56 pm
  17. It all fits with the Marxist plan to destroy society. At the end of the day if they can condone the sex with our children, then there is clearly nothing they aren’t capable of screwing.

    Posted by perryman | July 20, 2008, 10:43 pm
  18. WAS KARL MARX A PAEDOPHILE?

    Dylan asks “What is it with liblabconners and kiddy-fiddling?”

    Well, we have a Marxist EU. We have a Marxist government. It is not known whether Karl Marx was a paedophile, although speculation is out there. However, he supported the activities of “homosexual paedophiles” as can be seen from this letter, written in 1869, from to Engels.

    http://marx.org/archive/marx/works/1869/letters/69_06_22.htm

    Interestingly, Marx loved to be called “Old Nick” by the children. Make of that what you will.

    Posted by Shropshire Lass | July 20, 2008, 11:01 pm
  19. I would respectfully suggest that any convicted paedophile should as part of their sentence have to produce a document. This would list how they will prevent themselves from re-offending or any way disturb any other child.

    The Paedophile would do the document themselves (No Lawyers or Paedophile Support Industry). On production of an acceptable system the Paedophile would be considered for release. No acceptable system No release.

    Any person signing the release of a paedophile and the paedophile reoffends they would have committed a CRIME and go to JAIL minimum 5 years.

    Posted by ianpenrhyndd | July 20, 2008, 11:38 pm
  20. Here, you can read all about the Marxists “Little Red School Book”:

    http://www.marxists.org/archive/widgery/1971/07/porn.htm#n1

    And this quote says it all:

    “Guilt and self-hatred that arise from sexual innocence can only serve to strengthen the ruling class, whose ability to influence people’s ideas about themselves has never been greater.”

    Posted by Shropshire Lass | July 20, 2008, 11:42 pm
  21. It is claimed the Blair government was nearly brought down in 2003 by accusations of sexual abuse by ministers, claims made by America to force Blair to join them in the illegal wars.

    Posted by groundhog | July 20, 2008, 11:44 pm
  22. Ok, I’m a white collar Indigenous person of the UK, and here I am, I am now BNP.

    Why? Look at the hundreds of thousands that have immigrated here under the EU and we wonder why there is no housing and it costs a fortune for the youth of this country. Labour has lied and sold us British down the road.

    Labour bleats on about how good we’ve got it, yet we have the WORST rated quality of life in the EU. The only reason there was a housing boom is that they dropped the cost of mortgages. Inflation has been far higher than the official statistics. (Why the Public sector has not got themselves an economist and proved how their union members have suffered economically is beyond me, they need probably a 20% pay rise to get back to 1995 levels – council tax and everything else).

    Why now in this POLICE state do I have to suffer the indignity of a metal detection unit to actually travel on the tube system? We all know it’s Blacks killing Blacks here in London with knives (Look at the photo’s of who’s dying and who is involved), yet in true political correctness they make everyone’s quality of life suffer.

    If we lived in a democracy then we would have a referendum on immigration, but we don’t. Didn’t the commoners fight to have the right of representation.. Where is our representation? The only concessions that will arrive will be when the riots begin, it’s been the way of history and it seems the only solution. It’s a pity that it seems to be the only solution.

    Take a look at East London, all the worlds problems have been thrown on the good people there (Westminster council fly tips all its asylum seekers there etc.). Did they suffer the Blitz and did their grandfathers (and grandmothers) die so they could live in a third world environment?

    Look at Japan. They don’t allow immigration, in fact it is only western countries that have open doors. I wonder if we are like the Neanderthal and are slowly being pushed from the very land we live on.

    Anyway, my unreserved support is for the BNP from now on.

    -
    Glad to have you on board, Tommy, and we look forward to your further contributions-Ed

    Posted by Tommy | July 20, 2008, 11:47 pm
  23. Paedophilia is a double edged sword, beware of anarcho-tyranny:

    http://majorityrights.com/index.php/weblog/comments/http_majorityrightscom_indexphp_geoffs_132nd_post/

    Those who want to set up paedophile rings will be allowed to do so by the LibLabCon, since community cohesion must be preserved at all costs.

    Those who oppose the LibLabCon will be arrested, their computers confiscated and examined for child-pornography, which will invariably be found.

    The dissidents will be jailed and forbidden from owning a computer upon their release, thus effectively silencing them.

    Meanwhile, the enrichers will continue to ply their trade.

    Posted by Artorius | July 20, 2008, 11:56 pm
  24. any substantiating link for that interesting allegation? - Ed

    Posted by groundhog | July 21, 2008, 12:06 am
  25. It sickens me to the stomach this type of thing, they should be castrated if they are caught abusing children, is it not enough that they have ruined a child’s life by abusing them that they are then allowed to continue the state sponsored abuse of this poor victim and their family by having their “Human Rights” protected????

    They have proven they are not human by this vile act, and to then have jumped up clowns parading as social workers telling the family they can’t go shoppng at the weekend in their local mall, as the run the risk of meeting the pervert. This is typical of the yellow bellied, weak willed, sanctimonious b******* we have in government. That pervert should have been locked away for life, and I dont mean 7-10yrs I mean LIFE, because unfortunately we cannot hang the filth.

    WHAT ABOUT THE HUMAN RIGHTS OF THE GIRL TO LEAD AS NORMAL LIFE AS POSSIBLE AFTER WHAT THAT PIECE OF **** HAS DONE.

    Sorry Ed … but I hate this government with all my heart, we need out of the EU so we don’t have to put up with all this PC rubbish. Put me in control of punishment for these dirty, horrible, filthy scum, I will show them the true extent of the law.

    Posted by Liverpool Lad | July 21, 2008, 12:25 am
  26. Regarding my previous post regarding child pornography, I would suggest that

    (1) The producers of child pornography should be prosecuted
    (2) Anyone who finances the child pornography industry by paying for the stuff should be prosecuted.
    (3) Anyone who distributes the stuff should be prosecuted.

    However, possession should not be prosecuted because it is such an easy way for tyrants to discredit their opponents. Imagine what would happen if the West Midlands Police (to take a random example) were given orders from Number Ten to nail a political opponent. What’s the easiest thing to plant - guns, drugs or kiddie-porn? And of course possession of child-pornography carries a far greater stigma than possesing a shooter or wacky-baccy.

    interesting argument Artorious, very much on the lines of the 42 days detention without trial, which might seem sensible but for the fact we know they will cast their net widely. Of course WMP have done nothing for you to randomly select them!(apart from C4 Dispatches amongst other things) - Ed

    Posted by Artorius | July 21, 2008, 12:26 am
  27. It’s all nothing new at all except for the fact that there are more attempted cover ups now than ever before.
    Back in the fifties,a local councillor,who also happened to be a leader of a local sea cadet group,was found guilty of indecency with young boys and sentenced to two years in prison.
    I will not reveal his name on here because I’m sure his family suffered enough humiliation at the time. What the real shock from all this was, he told the court that “if all the culprits were brought to book,HALF THE COUNCILLORS WOULD BE BEFORE THE COURT.”
    So it’s only the tip of the iceberg that the public see in most cases.

    Posted by gyukcas | July 21, 2008, 12:58 am
  28. As I understand it, paedophiles are segregated in prison from other inmates - “for their own protection”. Even hardened criminals have their own methods of “dealing with” these reptiles whilst incarcerated. It would be a step in the right direction if such “special treatment” were campaigned against. I’d like to see paedophiles lumped together with other offenders - like they used to be. I can guarantee that “being dealt with” by fellow inmates would be most discouraging to kiddie-fiddlers. Few would re-offend.

    Posted by ASGARD | July 21, 2008, 1:58 am
  29. Outrage and revulsion at paedophile activity is shared by all decent-hearted Britons, not only by those who have children of their own. It is deeply implanted within our British tribal genes to find the sullying of innocence abhorrent. A surprising number of paedophiles are men with children of their own. Paedophilia is not limited to single or childless men.
    The destruction of the spirit is a Satanic/Common Purpose aim:- a very efficient means of damaging the spirit is to sexually abuse the child.
    Whereas Britons find paedophilia a vile thing, one notable culture at least celebrates paedophilia. I dare not write more.

    Posted by Askari | July 21, 2008, 2:24 am
  30. The fact that a mother and child have to stay away from a shopping centre to protect the rights of a paedophile really comes as no surprise to me. I myself was the target of a very prolific sexual predator at the age of 11. He was my secondary school sports teacher. It was widely known in the school and must have been covered up.

    About 5 years ago this man was featured in a documentary about Scotland Yard’s Peadophile Unit. A number of victims had come forward and the police were investigating. The CPS were handed a file but
    decided against prosecution due to the suspect’s age. Compare that to the treatment of our elderly when they default on their council tax payments.

    If anyone violates a child, lock them up for life with hard labour.
    If you kill a child, you hang!

    Posted by gullinbursti | July 21, 2008, 7:31 am
  31. I remember some people who had worked in Saudi Arabia. They said that it was common practice for arabs to take young boys to bed.
    It is (according to them) part of their religion as they believe that their next savior/ messiah will be born from a man.
    I do not know how true this is but there are plenty of stories about homosexual rape etc form people who have been to these countries.
    Perhaps this is why new labour allows them all in and gives them so much preference.

    Posted by je8stuart | July 21, 2008, 9:54 am
  32. Does anyone know of NAMBLA? I read with interest in the early 90’s that gay rights movements had “recently severed link” with them. WHAT? You mean you HAD links with them in the first place? The cry of NAMBLA is “today the paedophile, tomorrow the homosexual”. By the way, their man of the moment a couple of years ago was Michael Joseph Jackson - the ‘king’ of pop. I bet Gordon’s got a couple of his albums, stacked next to his Gary Glitter collection.

    Posted by Mandala | July 21, 2008, 11:00 am
  33. 40 MONTHS! That’s disgusting, a child’s life ruined and just 40 months. Don’t blame the social worker who was the messenger (at least they told them?!) but the pathetic laws that the corrupt leaders have allowed to be passed that allow this man to live free, where he chooses and have a life. Just wrong.

    Posted by jules | July 21, 2008, 1:54 pm
  34. Fine but please tighten it up, Mandala, thanks. - Ed

    Posted by Mandala | July 21, 2008, 7:10 pm
  35. It’s sicko-friendly Europe, starting in Brussels. Raping children doesn’t matter any more to the spiv caste of Euroland:

    http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/1139

    These spivs are at it themselves and complicit in the cover up:

    http://www.iht.com/articles/1999/12/16/brussels.2.t.php

    Posted by redwhite@cross | July 22, 2008, 8:11 am
  36. How do you separate the men from the boys in New Labour?

    Crowbar.

    Posted by Mandala | July 22, 2008, 12:08 pm
  37. @ Mandala

    Ed said you were to tighten it up, not loosen it! Still, you can’t get any more succinct than that - I laughed aloud at that one. Less is definitely more!

    Posted by SheriffofNottingham | July 22, 2008, 10:31 pm
  38. Posted by baccy_tin | July 24, 2008, 1:00 pm
  39. @ baccy_tin

    In your second link, it happens to warn parents that attitudes to sex have changed “dramatically”. At the same time it says that parents are often too embarrassed to speak to their children about the differences between “recreational” and “procreational” sex etc. If that’s the case, who IS talking to our children and shifting their mindset so drastically? It must be agents employed by the state, either consciously or unconsciously. I’m thinking teachers, magazine editors, television producers, church/youth leaders, video game designers, film directors. This means that parents are definitely not in control of what happens to their children. How did we get so left behind in the debate? Well, the fact is there never was any debate. It just “happened”, with a little push from those interested parties with their hidden agenda, like so much nowadays.

    Come on parents, let’s get those British youth clubs going, as Thorsmum said on a different article, and get some dialogue going. Nothing we say is going to embarrass the kids, they’re way beyond that. They just need dragging back from the cliff’s edge and told that it’s OK to be hesitant, ’cause the next step is gonna be paedophilia and that’s just a step too far. In fact, the article is right so far. We do need to talk to our kids, just not in the way they intended. We have to fight back to stop the rot!

    Posted by SheriffofNottingham | July 24, 2008, 10:59 pm

Post a comment

Please note. You can copy and paste the Youtube code directly into your post - No need for linking!

You must be logged in to post a comment.

SUBSCRIBE TO NEWSLETTER
Enter your Email address & receive news articles by email when they are posted on this site.
LOGIN / REGISTER


Online Auctions

John Lennon
Hand painted in acrylic on canvas. Dimensions; 20\"x20... - more...
Ending: 29th Aug 2008
Current Bid: £0.00
Bid Now
Powered by WP Auctions