The Lord Chief Justice supports Sharia Law
No, you didn’t misread the subject line! The Lord Chief Justice of our country really has said that Muslims living in Britain should be able to live under Sharia Law!
The man has gone mad, lost the plot completely is the instant reaction to this statement. But that would be to trivialise and misunderstand the depth of the treachery held within this pronouncement! For this senior Judge is neither mad, nor has he lost the plot! He knew exactly what he was doing when he gave I his speech at the East London Muslim Centre. He was giving the green light to Islamic leaders across Britain to begin the process of introducing the hateful Sharia Law into our country. The Judge did this with the full knowledge that this would be only the beginning for Islam will not be content with this, and will simply use it as a stepping stone for the introduction of the full version of Sharia Law. Firstly for themselves, but then, for the rest of us.
It is on this basis that we should judge Mr Philips, a man who has besmirched his’Office’ and betrayed the British people!
He should be hounded from office! But he won’t be - will he? For his is the authentic voice of our dastardly controllers!
Muslims in Britain should be able to live under Sharia law, says top judge
Lord Phillips of Worth Matravers, the Lord Chief Justice, strongly backed Rowan Williams, the Archbishop of Canterbury, over his suggestion earlier this year that aspects of Sharia law should be adopted in Britain.
The archbishop’s remarks sparked a national debate and led to calls for his resignation.
Risking inflaming that controversy again, Lord Phillips has said that Muslims in Britain should be able to use Sharia to decide financial and marital disputes.
The judge did add that only the criminal courts should have the power to decide when a crime has been committed and when to impose punishment.
But his suggestion that different religious groups should run their affairs according to different rules sparked warnings that community cohesion could be undermined.
In a speech at the East London Muslim Centre in east London, Lord Phillips said it was “not very radical” for Dr Williams to argue that Sharia law can be used to help govern issues like family disputes and the sale of financial products.
Lord Phillips said: “It is possible in this country for those who are entering into a contractual agreement to agree that the agreement shall be governed by law other than English law.”
Therefore, he said, he could see no reason why Sharia law should not be used to settle disputes in this country.
He said: “There is no reason why principles of Sharia law, or any other religious code, should not be the basis for mediation or other forms of alternative dispute resolution.”
He added: “It must be recognized however that any sanctions for a failure to comply with the agreed terms of the mediation would be drawn from the laws of England and Wales.”
Sharia law suffered from “widespread misunderstanding” in Britain, Lord Phillips said.
“Part of the misconception about Sharia law is the belief that Sharia is only about mandating sanctions such as flogging, stoning, the cutting off of hands or death for those fail to comply with the law,” he said.
“In some countries the courts interpret Sharia law as calling for severe physical punishment. There can be no question of such courts sitting in this country, or such sanctions being applied here.”
The judge said Dr Williams had been misunderstood when it was reported in February that he said British Muslims could be governed by Sharia law.
Lord Phillips said that the archbishop was saying only that “it was possible for individuals voluntarily to conduct their lives in accordance with Sharia principles without this being in conflict with the rights guaranteed by our law”.
There is already scope in English law for some communities to use their own religious codes to resolve disputes. Orthodox Jews can use the Beth Din rabbinical courts to decide on matters including divorce.
However some critics say that women marrying under Sharia law do not have the same rights as in English law, and could lead to them being treated as second class citizens as far as divorce settlements, custody of children and inheritance go.
Muslim and Christian politicians expressed fears that at a time of heightened tensions, encouraging Muslims to live by their own distinct rules could make it harder for different communities to integrate.
Khalid Mahmood, Labour MP for Birmingham Perry Bar and a practising Muslim, said that allowing Sharia law in parts of the UK would be divisive.
He said: “This would create a two-tier society. It is highly retrograde. It will segregate and alienate the Muslim community from the rest of British society.
“The majority of British Muslims want to live only under British law and they would reject anything that means they are treated differently.
“What Lord Phillips and the archbishop are discussing is something that is completely outside their area of understanding.”
Philip Davies, the Conservative MP for Shipley, said Lord Phillips’ suggestion was “totally unacceptable.”
He said: “It is very unhelpful for community cohesion. This is the sort of thing that builds up tensions in areas like mine, in places like Bradford. Sharia law has got no place in any shape or form in British law.”
Andrew Selous, a Tory MP and chairman of the all-party Christians in Parliament group, said calls like those made by Lord Phillips and the archbishop were “worrying.”
He said: “As far as people of all faiths are concerned, it is important that we are all equal under one United Kingdom law. It will lead to more community tensions rather than less.”
Lord Ahmed, a Labour peer and practicing Muslim, said there was a “big debate” among British Muslims about whether and how Sharia should apply in the UK.
He said: “There is a risk that this would make it harder for communities to integrate — we all need to do more to integrate, and mainstream society has to do more as well.”
“We should have one law for everyone in the UK, but there may be very rare occasions when exceptions have to be made, like for marriage, divorce and food.”
A Muslim lawyer said that raising the prospect of allowing people to live under Sharia law in Britain would “alarm” people.
Mahmud Al Rashid, spokesman from the Association of Muslim Lawyers, said: “There is massive misunderstanding about what Sharia is. It is not a single law.”
A spokesman for Dr Williams said: “We welcome the speech given by the Lord Chief Justice as a positive and constructive contribution to this important and ongoing debate.”
Cardinal Cormac Murphy O’Connor, the Archbishop of Westminster and leader of Britain’s Catholics, said that people should live under the laws of the UK.
His spokesman said: “As the Cardinal has consistently said and indeed said earlier this year, was that Britons should abide by and be subject to the law of the land.”
Downing Street said the Government’s position on the issue of Sharia law had been made clear at the time of the controversy over the Archbishop’s speech.
“We think that British law should be based on British values and determined by the British Parliament,” the Prime Minister’s spokesman said.
Baroness Warsi, the Conservative shadow minister for community cohesion, backed the judge.
She said: “The Lord Chief Justice’s speech is a very clear and unifying speech for our communities in Britain.
”I specifically endorse the points made by Lord Phillips that with equality of rights come responsibilities. It is absolutely essential that everyone in this country is treated equally by the law but it is important that everyone is equally subject to it, and that the same laws apply equally to everyone.”
Source: Daily Telegraph
Share this page:
This Dhimmi should have his head - with silly wig - placed on a pike and displayed at London Bridge.
That’s the traditional treatment for traitors.
This really makes my blood boil! Another politically correct senile judge undermining democracy.
Judges in our system seem to be totally unaccountable. I believe judges should be elected every four years. Ed, what is the BNP’s policy on this?
-
No policy mandate, however it is generally felt that Judges should be elected. - Ed
The more they spout such nonsense the more people wake up to the fact that only the BNP can save this country and its people from extinction. Take it coming M´Luds!
Amazing! The conservatives back sharia law as well!
I’m uttererly amazed and how eager people are to turn this country into an Islamic state.
So now you have it,straight from the horses mouth,and predicted by the only political party that truly represents the indigenous population,the BNP.Is it any wonder that the BNP goes from strength to strength regularly beating the Nulabour fools in elections.As for sharia law ,those muslims that want to live under it ,should go to another country where it is operated.
They are becoming more & more blatent about their agenda & they don’t see the ridiculous contradictions in their statements.
If everyone is equal under the law & you allow sharia law to be legal then that surely means that we would all be subject to it.
You can’t have a two tier system & equality at the same time.
How is his suggestion unifying?
Silly me, we DO have a two tier system already.
Moslems can complain about dogs on posters & the like & be taken very seriously, but a white person complaining about Moslem behaviour is another thing entirely.
“We should have one law for everyone in the UK, but there may be very rare occasions when exceptions have to be made, like for marriage, divorce and food.”
No, Lord Ahmed, “One law for everyone means exactly what it says” with NO exceptions! The “Have to be made” part of the noble Lord’s argument is ominous. An inch would soon develop into a mile if “very rare” exceptions (Marriage, divorce and food?!!)were to be allowed.
The Lord Chief Justice’s pronouncement is yet another example of how ineffably treacherous “The Great and The Good” have become in NuLabour’s Britain!
I’m 16, I support the BNP, so do many other 16yr olds I know.
There is definitely an undercurrent of BNP support in this country, and its growing!
Stories like this are why. This makes me sick.
This country’s going down faster than the Titanic.
BNP are the only hope.
-
Welcome aboard, Alex - Site Editor
Speechless! - I’ll let the Bible do the talking:
Psalm 58:1-2
Do you rulers indeed speak justly?
Do you judge uprightly among men?
No, in your heart you devise injustice, and your hands mete out violence on the earth.
Gonna swear - this makes me so BLOODY ANGRY!!!
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1031784/Schoolboys-punished-detention-refusing-kneel-pray-Allah.html
…….
Outrageous - but not surprising. Only one question needs to be asked - Will moslem pupils be required to learn how Jews and Christians pray? Answers on a pinhead, please.
You can email the school here: admin@alsagerschool.co.uk
-Ed
Ed - might you be so kind as to provide an email address so we can pour out fiery wrath and indignation upon him? (politely and intelligently of course)
-
Lets see how things transpire first. - Ed
alex_92. Welcome on board.
It’s great to hear that not all youngsters are being brainwashed by the Marxist NUT.
Britons - it’s time to make your minds up:
Vote for the eu/liblabcon/islam party, or the British National Party.
Time is running out!
When they refer to laws, exactly what laws are they referring to? they never define the difference.
Most so called laws are not laws but statutes, A statute is a formal, written law of a country or state, written and enacted by its legislative authority. There are only three real laws, do not kill or harm another human being, do not steal or harm anyones property, and lastly do not commit any mischief in your contracts.
So what is the definition of Sharia law? is it a set of common Muslim laws or are they a set of rules validated by Imams. I think they would say it’s the law of their supreme being and therefore can not be changed. This type of thinking is clearly dangerous to any civilized Country such as ours.
Sharia law anywhere in the civilised world is a clear danger and should be resisted at all costs as it sets out uncivilised and inhuman punishments and will be the thin end of the wedge, just as allowing Mosques into our Country is also a danger to our society as a whole.
Those Muslims that agree with Sharia law can use our most valued law of freedom, and leave to move somewhere that follows this barbaric system I can assure you that we will not stop you.
They must integrate and follow our laws or leave, its that simple.
“In some countries the courts interpret Sharia law as for calling for severe physical punishment. There can be no question of such courts sitting in this country.”
Let me get this straight, he advocates some Sharia law, but not as the Muslims want to administer it, hmm! yes I see, makes sense. No chance of a tangled web of conflicting law here then!
So Sharia law is misunderstood in this country, no wonder. Quite frankly I don’t give a monkey’s toss how Sharia law works.
The only place for that medieval law, far far older and more barbaric than historic laws of this land that we have fought to get rid of, is the dustbin of history.
This story on one hand infuriates me, but on the positive side it is polarizing the indigenous population far quicker and efficiently than the BNP ever could.
We are fortunate in that the enemy is so confidant and brazen, that will be its downfall.
The fortunate thing for us about the Muslim threat is that they are always over confident and of course physically they stick out like a sore thumb on our lands, they cannot infiltrate us.
Lets have more nonsense from these judicial people, look at our rising votes!.
Mark my words, this will be the thin end of the wedge.
Words can’t express the anger that I feel at the moment.
The only positive to come out of this whole sorry episode is that the Islamification of the UK is what prompted me to join the BNP. I’m sure that the Lord Chief Justice has just recruited many more members for us.
So if you kill your wife you can elect to be judged by Sharia law. As women are just for mens use you can say she was unfaithful and get off. The lions led by Donkeys comes to mind again. And he, as a judge, is supposed to have wisdom. Go tell that to the donkey!
I would like Sharia for the beheading of politicians though (lol).
Hand chopping time is here courtesy of the wife-beating, kiddie groomers.
Has Lord Chief Justice Philips been bitten by Archbishop Williams? The man’s mad.
…..
They’ve both obviously supped the cup of Common Purpose. -Ed
So today it’s the nice, smiley reasonable face of Islam we’re seeing. Sounds all very reasonable…
Baroness Warsi, the Conservative shadow minister for community cohesion, backed the judge.
She said: “The Lord Chief Justice’s speech is a very clear and unifying speech for our communities in Britain”.
Certainly don’t sound unifying to me & the majority of Britons I bet. More lib/lab/con/Muslim doublespeak
”I specifically endorse the points made by Lord Phillips that with equality of rights come responsibilities. It is absolutely essential that everyone in this country is treated equally by the law but it is important that everyone is equally subject to it, and that the same laws apply equally to everyone.”
”…everyone…is treated equally…same laws apply to everyone”.
But imposing sharia law would create a separate or parallel system. More doublespeak.
As usual it will be the thin edge of the ‘moderate’ Muslim wedge & next week it will be the hardlines turn to demand concessions.
Muslim copper following sharia law?
“You can’t preach the Bible here, this is a Muslim area”, (What a community policeman told two Christians)
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1023483/You-preach-Bible-Muslim-area-What-police-told-Christian-preachers.html
When they say sharia law cannot trump British law, it beggars belief that they don’t realise it already has.
Husbands living in a “harem” with multiple wives have been cleared to claim state benefits for all their different partners.
A Muslim man with four spouses - which is permitted under Islamic law - could receive £10,000 a year in income support alone.
http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/article-23435519-details/Muslim+husbands+with+more+than+one+wife+to+get+extra+benefits+as+ministers+recognise+polygamy/article.do
SEND THESE APPEASERS to an Islamic country, and let them take a Bible and a cross with them. See how quick sharia law takes care of them!
Islam has one goal and one goal only, and the quicker these people realise, the better.
I’ve just had a close look at the photo of Lord Phillips. The white flag of surrender he’s holding is looking distinctly battered, no doubt he has been waving it in front of our enemies for far to long!
Dig his bling!
I am a British Christian, I will NEVER abide by sharia law!
This is ridiculous, totally mad!
I’m sure there are millions who feel the same in the UK, & billions worldwide!
@ Paganpete
The teacher responsible for this disgusting Satanic child abuse MUST BE SACKED and never allowed to work with children again.
I see the demon-worshippers have started another major seething and whingeing campaign: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/muslims-feel-like-jews-of-europe-859978.html with the BNP being blamed for ‘Islamophobia’ (nothing to do with 7/7 of course) http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/the-enemy-within-fear-of-islam-britains-new-disease-859996.html
This campaign seems to be the prelude to another round of demands for special treatment and silencing of all criticism of their wicked, vicious cult and its loathsome, depraved, psychopathic, perverted ‘Prophet’.
Defend free expression - Use it or lose it!
I too saw that imbecile senile judge shoot off this treachery on TV. No word from HM Queenie? Defender of the faith? Dear God, I am so angry.
But every cloud has a silver lining - this idiocy could translate into another few hundred members of the BNP.
Welcome Alex_92. A 16-year old with a mind which has not been stunted by the (dis)education system. Young people are the future of this country, thank God for the ones with a healthy brain.
Nice Artorius.
Coincidence that these articles arrived the same day as the Judges ’sharia UK’ speech? Maybe making us feel guilty about it all and letting them have their way again?
Good! If this parasite supports ‘Sharia Law’ then why doesn’t he go and live in an islamic country who practise it and take all the vile muslims currently living in our country who take the p*** out of all of us with him.
I am so sick to death of hearing about muslims. They hate everything about our way of life, as do certain people who should know better. Muslims have no place in civilised society. I wish the whole lot of them would go back to their own countries and leave us all alone to get on with our lives, without the constant wining about us Brits being racist for not wanting any more mosques built etc.
I think everyone is in agreement that one law for some and another for others is intrinsically divisive and inequitable. How can you be a Lord Chief Justice and not know that? Even Muslims agree that the parameters of Sharia law are laid out by the Koran with little leeway and ideally would want everyone to live under it. They themselves, if given their way, would not want any exemptions or, if they did, with a hefty tax (jizya). Let the Muslims pay us a good wallop for the privilege and I’ll consider it but certainly not otherwise and especially not if, as I truly believe, it is the thin end of the wedge.
In the Middle Ages we had a similar conflict between the State and the Church, especially between Henry II and Thomas Becket who wished to uphold the ecclesiastical courts run under Canon law which is the Christian equivalent of Sharia law. Canon law is a body of rulings based on religious teachings and governed many aspects of our lives, including wills, marriages and morals, with courts set up to try violators. It could not impose the death sentence but got round that by passing the criminal over to the lay courts to be sentenced. A cleric was treated more leniently than a layman: he only had to recite the “neck verse” to get off being hanged, a “benefit of clergy”. There has been ongoing conflict in western Europe for the last 1,000 years and more as to who should have overall authority, religion or the State, and recently the idea of a secular government has become paramount over that of a theocracy. Do we really want to give away all our hard-won gains to people who do not share our history of struggle with its slow progress towards self-determination by the people? Do we really want to have to go over it all again for another couple of centuries or so? Who are these people? Have we appointed them to give away all our vital achievements in the sphere of political freedom? They’ve already given away all our economic achievements, don’t let them destroy the rest.
On a final note of despair, when Khalid Mahmood MP says that British Muslims would reject anything that means they are treated differently, does this mean that eventually, for uniformity’s sake, they will be asking for all of us to be treated the same under Sharia law? Similarly, I don’t like the sound of Lord Ahmed’s suggestion that mainstream society has to do more to integrate - that’s like asking traffic on a one-way street to turn round to accommodate a rogue car going in the other direction. Moreover, since when have marriage, divorce and food become “rare exceptions”? To me, they are the stuff of everyday life. Do some of us not eat, then? What is Baroness Warsi going on about? If she supports the judge, how can she then call his speech “unifying” when she is the one person who should know how the indigenous community will react? Why does the shadow minister for community cohesion (no less) talk about “communities” in the plural when her title particularly emphasises one community in the singular? Furthermore, she supports the judge’s call for Sharia law and then says that everyone should be equally subject to the same law - does she mean Sharia law? She should be asked to clarify exactly what she does mean. They fool us into taking too much for granted - just like the unknown quantity of the Lisbon treaty and the ill-defined terminology in the 42-day detention law. WAKE UP AND VOTE BNP!
Thanks Ed - have emailed the school - suggest everyone else does the same - also put it on digg - give it a click;
http://digg.com/world_news/UK_Schoolboys_punished_for_refusing_to_pray_to_Allah
The day has now come that all judges must be elected. That meens all judges can be sacked. That meens all Judges are answerable to the people. Lastly Standind for election will not be exclusive to the legal profession but open to lay people.That would really get up their collective nostrils. Perhaps even a few Poles could apply, then they would know how the rest of us feel. This is my reccomendation to the BNP for future policy
Stonings in Trafalgar Square! Beheadings at the Tower of London! Roll up! Roll up! Get your tickets today!
Paganpete schools near where I live have exactly the same problem. One school as part of some nonsense called ‘the Citizenship Programme’ made the year 9 students visit a mosque where they had to learn about the islamic faith and ask an iman about islam. The girls also had to wear the full veil! When I saw the picture of this in the local paper I was completly disgusted. If they were my children I would not allow them to visit a mosque - let alone wear the full islamic dress. What where the parents thinking - they should not have allowed their children to go on this brainwashing trip in the first place.
I have just come home from my Local,a little Pub in a village in Cambridgeshire.
There were about fifteen peoiple in the bar and my wife and I got talking to a Lady who was there, about dogs actually.
I am not sure how,but our conversation turned to Immigrants and then to Moslems.Suddenly just about all the others in the pub joined in and to a man and a women,they were all of the same mind.That was that there were too many immigrants in our country by far, and secondly that they all despise what is happening to Our Country relative to Moslems.
I felt that if I had stood up there and then and said lets start a revolution now and sort it out,they would all have followed.
The BNP was not mentioned once,but you can be sure that when I visit this pub again and at the right time,I will bring up the question of support for The BNP in order to put right the Rape of Great Britain,and to right the wrongs as seen by this local rural group of people, which I am sure is becoming more and more common across The Whole Country.
Well, once upon a time perhaps we could have stopped Britain’s descent before it began. But now we know we’re facing some very tough times indeed, so I say, “Keep talking Judge!”
The sooner our people realise what’s happening the better, and if it takes stuff like this to wake them up, great!
Better a sharp shock than the slow creeping sickness which no one ever notices until it’s too late.
Next thing we’ll see is forced prayer to Allah in our schools…
Oh, it’s happened already!
Wakey Wakey Joe ‘n’ Jane Average…
When will this madness end.Muslims making more and more demands,which in their own lands deny these rights to non-muslims.
Why muslims have come to animal loving Britain,if dogs are unclean to them?
How come muslims have no problem entering Denmark where the number of pigs outnumber that of people?
Muslims come in and make the best of democracy to enforce their sharia laws.
I admire the two students who refused to bow down to the fake god,allah.
What this cretin doesnt understand is that by “allowing” muslims to “choose” to follow sharia laws there will not be an option given to muslims but it will become a requirement forced upon all muslims with the official sanction of the British Government.
Then what happens when a non muslim has a dispute with a muslim?
It wont be long before muslims insist upon sharia law being applied esp. if the muslim feels to be the offended party.
Will women have a choice in reality - of course not. Will ordinary muslims who otherwise would be happy with English law - never. Will anyone making contracts with muslims be forced into accepting sharia law - of course they will.
It wont be long before local councils, the goverment and employers will be obliged to take out sharia contracts with muslim companies, individuals and organsations - out of “respect” and “diversity”.
Its obvious where this will lead.
Its a pity that our lives are in the hands of morons who can’t see past the end of their noses.
Like we already new one law for them one for us/ I always thought if you lived in a country you lived by their law / Thats why I wont live in an Islamic country. if these people dont like the laws of this land that have been created for the indiginous people over thousands of year / The best thing is to leave and go live in the yemen or Saudia Arabia We are not changing our laws for Shiria/ Although it would be a good Idea to burn some of these thieving female politicians Cherie Blair as well as witches !! I agree with that bit ,VOTE BNP before its to late bewarned . treason for tjhe rest bring back the rope.
If muslims are offered an inch, they’ll take an inch - and if offered a mile, they’ll take a mile. All they are doing is attempting to expand the ummah to include the UK which is what adherents of any imperialist doctrine would do. The muslims aren’t traitors to this country or people because they are not of this country or of its people. For them, expulsion to a land compatible with their belief system is their fate. However, the fact that the UK’s establishment now collaborates in the expansion of this alien and retrograde doctrine is treason. Any incoming BNP government should immediately bring back the death penalty for treason only, and then bring the likes of Lord Phillips to account.
What I want to know is, what was his fancy lordship DOING in East London Muslim Centre?
When have you, I or any other WHITE indigenous Brit been invited to hear the Lord Chief Justice speech?
The man had NO rights being there in the first place; I contend that he has compromised his position and has undermined the tenent of British Law, being BOTH into disrepute.
He should be fired; dumped; let go … whatever it is you do with Lord Chief Justices when they’ve gone well passed their sell-by date.
I emailed a few bodies last night when this story first broke; I shall let you all know if, and when I receive replies.
The liblabcon is doing as much damage as it can as fast as it can.
They are filling their boots, ready to flee after they’ve handed over Britain to Islamic rule in 2012.
That shiny new mega-mosque to be built alongside the olympic village?
The Islamic parliament building?
Fantasy? Scare-mongering? Islamophobia?
When you have the time watch this again -
http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=2668560761490749816
And this -
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QygwC7S2iEY
This weekend, all of us should be out and about telling the truth about what is being done to us.
If we don’t, we might as well vote for it too.
Time is running out.
Rumour has it that Britain could, essentially, be handing over Britain to Islam in 2012.
The Olympic mega-mosque could be the new European “Sharia Parliament”.
I do wonder why Parliamentarians are lining their pockets with no consideration for the rest of us. Those “in the know” will probably be out of the country and into their tax-haven holiday homes in a shot.
There is already evidence:
MUSLIM GROUP BEHIND MEGA-MOSQUE SEEKS TO CONVERT ALL BRITAIN
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/faith/article2419524.ece
and
http://www.christianvoice.org.uk/mosque1.html
from which I quote:
“The radical Tablighi Jamaat are not expected to teach tolerance and integration in the mega-mosque. They will teach the way of Jihad, the path of martyrdom, the superiority of Shariah law and the supremacy of Islam in Britain. Waves of destabilization and terror will spread like ripples from West Ham over the whole United Kingdom.”
FUNDED BY TERRORISTS
http://www.christianvoice.org.uk/mosque2.html
SECRET MEETINGS
http://www.christianvoice.org.uk/mosque3.html
I am sure that folks such as Artorius, Winston and the Sheriff can come up with more evidence of what amounts to a proposed hijacking of Britain by Radical Islam.
VOTE BNP and put a STOP to the madness!
Shropshire Lass,
Some very worrying links. What else are these traitors hiding from us? I suppose we can look just a bit on the bright side and say that more and more people will be joining the BNP!
-
Just keep spreading the word, Thelma -ED
Its beginning to look as if Shropshire Lass and baccy_tin (above) may be right.
Check this out -
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9pn9Mul98JY
God help us if the public don’t wake up soon!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nBKgkgrPJaI&feature=related
Is the BNP wrong to want to protect us from this?
Surely as we now regularly see these horrific revelations of treason in high places, the people must be waking up to the fact that the BNP is the ONLY political force opposing them? The day of sitting on the fence and vainly hoping that things will somehow work out is long past. The situation grows daily more dire and the danger more immediate. Join the BNP today!
Sharia Law in the UK…NO! Sharia punishments for Muslims who break our laws and break their own religious laws…YES! Thus, any Muslim found guilty of theft, tax or benefit fraud or any insurance or credit card criminal act involving money; has a limb chopped off. They could not complain–it’s their punishment system, so we are allowing them to practise their barbaric means of retribution and punishment. Muslims would surely be grateful. What else could the Muslim Parliament do but heap praise upon us for this enlightened approach? Again, the punishments for drinking alcohol, adultery, etc. must be imposed. I’m sure that any number of ‘ladies of the night’ and quite a few of the day, could be found to bear witness as to adultery, and there must be thousands of Muslims known to one and all who drink.
We should go further, and encourage Muslims in the UK to follow the teaching of the Prophet to the letter. Nowhere in the Koran does it mention child tax credits, invalidity benefit, income support, NHS or any other benefits. It follows that we must deny Muslims (for their own good and in accordance with their religion) all benefits of the modern Welfare State. Islam, as we are constantly being told, is not a ‘pick and mix religion’.
Maybe the Lord Chief Justice might change his tune if a huge mosque were to be built in the beautiful
Dorset village of Worth Matravers? (I think that’s where he lives). Maybe a whole new town of enrichers
could be built on the edge of the village? He could even go along and help out at Eid slitting some poor
sheep’s throat. Better still, he can do a home swap with me. I live in the Islamic Republic of Poplardesh.
(Tower Hamlets.) However he would need to swap his wig for a steel helmet as some of the enrichers
around here are a bit partial to cleaving open white skulls every now and then.
The Truth about Tablighi Jamaat
Tablighi Jamaat: Jihad’s Stealthy Legions
http://www.meforum.org/article/686
The West’s misreading of Tablighi Jamaat actions and motives has serious implications for the war on terrorism. Tablighi Jamaat has always adopted an extreme interpretation of Sunni Islam, but in the past two decades, it has radicalized to the point where it is now a driving force of Islamic extremism and a major recruiting agency for terrorist causes worldwide. For a majority of young Muslim extremists, joining Tablighi Jamaat is the first step on the road to extremism. Perhaps 80 percent of the Islamist extremists in France come from Tablighi ranks, prompting French intelligence officers to call Tablighi Jamaat the “antechamber of fundamentalism”.
DO NOT ALLOW THIS MOSQUE TO HAPPEN, PEOPLE!
I’ve been reading a discussion on another site where the subject of one law for the indigenous population while the rest can pick and choose what suits them was raised.
A year or so back any such discussion was stopped and the poster accused of being a racist. Today not a dickybird of complaint, just agreement.
Eyes are at last seeing what is around them, the tide is turning.
……
They do catch on, eventually. - Ed
Anyone know if this doddering old fool Philips has fallen on his head recently?
Oh, I forgot to mention that any outraged reader of this article might like to leave a message for his Lordship by email at…
general.enquiries@judiciary.gsi.gov.uk
I understand that once appointed a Judge is impossible to remove. This leaves us with a problem! I believe he is treasonable in his statement! If so, how should we deal with him?
Brin
A view on the liberals appeasement of Islam:
Next these Muslims will be asking for their own government and for this country to be carved up into sub states to meet their needs. If they hate British Justice and the UK so much they should go home and stay there. When will this madness end? I suspect this so called Judge will be receiving an investiture at Buckingham Palace for cultural enrichment and race relations, rather than being dismissed from his office for making a mockery of our legal system.
Brin if you want to get rid of this judge you have undermine credibility and authority legally and force him into a position where he has to resign. This is practically impossible as it would mean having an insider in his office willing to do this. He is undermining his own authority by allowing Sharia Law to become part of our legal system. A good start on clamping down of this sort of thing is to vote and actively support the BNP.
This was yet another desperate attempt by the establishment to get Muslims on board. They’ll do anything not to have to confront the religion of peace. The judge is in cloud cuckoo land if he thinks this will satisfy Islam in Britain.
Coming to every town & city soon, executions in the street.
Wake up!
I think Lord Chief of Justice is Brilliant…seriously.
It is the best recruitment the BNP could hope for, and it doesnt cost us a penny.
In all seriousness, these comments from this so called ‘judge’ are an insult to the men and women that have died fighting terrorism in Iraq and Afghanistan.
To Apest, I am absolutely certain and I have said this before, is that the next thing the Moslems will demand and will probably get is a renaming of certain British towns with a Moslem alternative. It WILL HAPPEN and two or three of the most likely places are Slough, Leicester or Bradford. MARK MY WORDS!!!.
I’ve just looked at the “Have your say” section of the BBC web-site and….joy! it looks to me as if most of the views co-incide with those in the BNP comments section.
@ whiskyindia
I think you will find that the Muslims have pre-empted us yet again:
http://www.bnp.org.uk/2008/05/shoreditch-high-street-station-no-banglatown-station-init/
Until the BNP come to power, we will always be wrong-footed by our enriching step-brethren and the reason is that our own governments are complicit in tripping us up. I think Shropshire Lass (above) has done us a great service in bringing this to our attention. Perhaps we could have an article to underline the danger, please?
Dar al Sulh: This is where there is a minority Muslim population living amongst a Non - Muslim majority. The strategy is to adopt a stance of peaceful “deceit”, thereby lulling the “Host” population into a false security.
Dar al Harb: When the Muslim population feels it has grown to an extent where it can begin to challenge the host element, by making demands on it, and gradually imposing its will on the native people, it will then cause the “Territory Of The Infidel” to become a War Zone.
Dar al Islam: Following victory, the Islamic conquerors will impose the full wait of the “Shari´a” on the defeated people.
-
Yep, sounds like Parasitism to me -Ed
re: Shropshire Lass link, the lib/lab/con consists of the worst kind of self-serving cowardly traitors.
The time for sitting on the fence is long past. This mega-mosque supported by these lunatic radicals Tablighi Jamaat & funded by Saudi Arabia, an Islamic country which does not allow one place of worship for any other religion but Islam & Islam only, would be seen by these fanatics as tantamount to the UK flying the white flag of surrender & the first major step in the conquest of our own British homeland.
Mad Marxist Red Ken Livingstone is a keen proponent and that should be enough to raise the ire of any true British man or woman. We must all do everything in our power to halt the construction of this ugly showpiece for Islamic conquest on our own British soil. We are many. They are few. We are the British. They are the refuse of failed third-world Islamic hellhole societies. Islam? Never. Never. A hundred times never. Vote BNP and send the well-fed traitor politicians scurrying back into their rat-holes.
“He should be hounded from office! But he won’t be - will he? For his is the authentic voice of our dastardly controllers!”
If only we still had the good old laws of England(and later Britain) this wretched man would be arraigned on a charge of Praemunire - a law designed to smash such as him and only finally abolished in 1967. I pray that when we have a patriot government these excellent laws will be reinstituted witout delay. Many know of Magna Carta and Habeas Corpus; these have been the great shield of our people, though now miserable traitors seek to weaken them. But we also had broad-sword and battle-axe as well with Praemunire, Impeachment and Attainder precisely honed to strike down enemies.
The great English jurist Blackstone defined Praemunire as “introducing a foreign power into the land and creating an Imperium in Imperio, a State within a State, by paying obedience to other processes which constitutionally belong to the King alone.” This perfectly describes what Phillips has advocated. It was an offence of the utmost gravity and the penalties reflected it; including the loss of all civil rights, forfeiture of lands, goods and chattels, and imprisonment during the royal pleasure.
The recognition of Sharia courts is one further step along the road of Islamic colonisation and hence the establishment of an alien and deadly dangerous foreign power amongst us. This is utter treachery, and stupidity is no excuse. Phillips must pay a high price.
“Half of children believe people of different backgrounds and cultures should not live in the same country, it is claimed. ”
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/politics/education/2240808/Schools-leaving-children-‘globally-illiterate’.html
This is really, really encouraging news. Young people are doubtless most vulnerable to propaganda simply because they haven’t the life experince to see through it. But despite the numerous, totalitarian, paradise of diversity offensives to which they have been subjected half of them aren’t buying it. And with left- liberalism collapsing economically, socially, ethnically and religiously the pendulum will swing back with a vengeance!
Please hang this traitor, or in true Islamic style behead him!!!
TRAITOR and what more can be said!
Of course why not allow sharia law, a bit more eating away of our culture, one more step of so called equality for the minorities and less for the natives - of course the pendulum continues to swing in their direction, but it has to swing back at some point. The sooner the better! When in Rome……..you know the rest - if don’t like it here then they can take the fast train out of here! I of course am reserving my true feelings of this.
An armed policeman once told me that traitors can still be hung at the dockside? is this true?
If so it might explain why they have shut so many.
alex_92:- welcome indeed! You can have no idea how cheering it is for those of us who are so old we remember Britain in her Glory, to read of British youngsters who refuse to be led like cattle to the slaughter, who can see for themselves what is happening to our once lovely land.
Gordon Brown, You and your vile disgusting party of traitors are finished. As is the so called Anglican church and the equally treacherous law makers and justice system because every one of you have betrayed the very foundations of all that is sacred to this country and its rightful owners,”the indigenous Brits” and you will NEVER be forgiven.
Of course,you have known this for some time now and in your death throes you are determined to do as much damage to your fellow countrymen and women as your vile policies will allow.
There will never be a labour party ever again because even your most dedicated supporters realise that you have lead them into absolute oblivion.
As a true believer in freedom and democracy,I would like to say “good riddance”!!
Now another top lawyer demands that Sharia Law be introduced.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1032080/Former-chair-Bar-Council-calls-sharia-rules-English-law.html
” … it is vital that we look at ways to integrate Muslim culture into our own traditions.’ …”
So there we have it folks - it is we who must submit to Islam in our own country!
This is extremely unwise, to say the least. This dangerous fool needs to be swiftly removed from office before he can do any more harm. As for his belief that we should adopt parts of Sharia law in Britain, which parts of British law will they be adopting in Saudi Arabia then? If Muslims cannot live under British law they must return to live in an Islamic country, of which It must be made crystal clear to them that Britain will NEVER BE!
@ MC SE9
I can’t find anything about such a law having survived the abolition of capital punishment on 27 January 1999 by Jack Straw as Home Secretary when he signed the 6th Protocol of the European Convention of Human Rights in Strasbourg. However, it is thought that the Lisbon treaty reintroduces the death penalty in Europe in a footnote to a footnote in the case of war, riots and upheaval (whatever that turns out to be). Presumably, it is equally applicable to both sides of the conflict so it behoves the BNP to be on the winning side so that we can hoist the b******s on their own yardarms.
Lord Philips’ name doesn’t appear on the lists of attendees of the 2006 and 2007 Bilderberg Group conferences, but that doesn’t mean he hasn’t been and is, in fact, a member of the Bilderberg Group. There certainly cannot be any doubt whatever that he is Common Purpose-trained saboteur - a clearly committed destroyer of Western civilisation.
Many thanks for that link, Lickyalips. It is quite apparent that we are being softened up here. It has always been possible to use any form of mediation by a third party in dispute resolution but the agreement is only enforceable provided that it conforms to the principles of English law. The inherent problem with Sharia is that it is the code of colonisers to whom the wretched Phillips and Williams are giving aid and comfort. The determinations of Sharia courts will not be referred to the English courts for enforcement will be by “community” pressure and sanction. English law will be increasingly by-passed altogether. It should take no great wisdom to see this. From our point of view this is yet another dose of bad news because it augments and strengthens the hand of the colonisers, who can now say that they operate with the approval of no lesser figures than the dhimmi Archbishop and Lord Chief Justice.
But Hockman it seems wishes to go further: “Stephen Hockman QC said legal reforms to incorporate Islamic principles are inevitable. He warned that ‘otherwise we will find there is a very significant section of our society which is increasingly alienated, with very dangerous results. ‘” The clear implication of this is that “Islamic principles” will be enforceable at English law. Hockman’s suggestion that: “it is vital that we look at ways to integrate Muslim culture into our own traditions.’ must mean the surrender of aspects of our long cherished principles of freedom and liberty. The Muslim tradition is chalk and cheese, fire and water, to ours. They simply do not do freedom of speech and freedom of religion; the traditional Islamic penalty for apostasy, death, is proof positive of this.
http://www.dennishollingsworth.us/archives/images/FreedomGoToHell.gif - Ed
If Hockman’s words are to be taken at face value he must surely realise that this “very significant section of our society” is going to continue to be “increasingly alienated” until our country either becomes part of Dar-al-Islam, or effectual ways are found of dealing with the problem. The Judiciary impedes the national cause at every turn, as we saw recently with the quite absurd decisions to bail Qatada and the Algerian terror suspect. The “Human Rights” Act has encouraged some of them to suppose that they can not merely interpret law but make it! This is absolutely contrary to our traditions; one of which was that giving aid and comfort to an alien power, seeking to establish a state within a state, was the gravest possible offence. Let us call this for the treason that it is.
http://bp2.blogger.com/_Qm2i8mXTjhs/SG-yHMxFeCI/AAAAAAAAAkE/ovxTmfnuMto/s1600-h/extreme_irony.jpg - Ed
Grand personages like Phillips, Williams and Hockman think they know so much better than we do; they believe themselves untouchable. But then so did the King’s Minister, Thomas Wentworth, Earl of Strafford; William Laud, Archbishop of Canterbury; and Charles I himself. They went to the block in 1641, 1645 and 1649 respectively The taller they are, the harder they fall.
I just cant believe the constant stupidity of these people!
Everybody should just look at “What the West Needs to Know” -
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-871902797772997781
This should be shown everywhere in the west, and that liberal bed wetter the “Lord Chief Justice” should be forced to watch.
We Christians have been fighting Islam since the Crusades. Are we going to just lie down now and let them rule us?
Not Me!!! I vote BNP!!
Our time will come and peace will rule again in Britannia!