NEW WEBSITE FEATURE: ...... We are pleased to announce our new News Forum. Available on a trial basis! Click here to visit the forums now......

News Archive

National ‘papers censor perceived racist Hammer Attack Sentencing story

Out of interest your news team had a quick scan of the online versions of the national ‘papers this morning to see what, if anything, they reported on the Wroughton Hammer Attack sentencing story.

The result? It’s pretty much as we expected – wall-to-wall censorship. Well, the victim of this widely perceived racist crime was only a young native Briton after all, and as such of no real consequence! Henry Webster will therefore be added to a long and growing list of native British victims of racist violence ignored by the media – see here .

To be specific, we could find no mention in The Guardian, Independent, Daily Telegraph, Times, Daily Express or Sun.

The Labour supporting Daily Mirror provided a brief and highly “sanitised” mention – here it is in full:

A judge yesterday blasted a school where a teen was almost beaten to death with a hammer. Henry Webster suffered the beating – likened to a scene in a Tarantino film – at the tennis courts in Ridgeway School, Wroughton, Wilts, last year. It left him with three skull fractures and a brain injury. Nazrul Amin 19 , two 15-year-olds, a 16-year-old and a 17-year-old, all from Swindon, were jailed at Bristol Crown court yesterday. They were among 13 young men convicted for the attack. Judge Carol Hagen said: “What I find astonishing is not a single staff member was present when the bell went”.

The only national newspaper to produce a worthwhile report and one that, as predicted yesterday by us, would decline to make the point that one of the jailed thugs was the son of a local imam, was the Daily Mail. However, the Mail report was useful, inasmuch as it refers to racist incidents at the school prior to the cowardly hammer attack on lone Henry Webster – thus reinforcing the belief that this was indeed a racist crime. We quote:-

What began on January 11, 2007 as a confrontation between two groups of pupils, one being white, and one being Asian, culminated in the brutal and savage attack on a white pupil, Henry Webster that afternoon

The Daily Mail’s offereing may be read: here .

However, although not a “national”, a special mention should be made in respect of the Bristol Evening Post. Quoting from the BNP’s Regional Voices site:

You would have reasonably expected that the Bristol Evening Post would have reported on the Hammer Attack cases that have been before Bristol Crown Court, over much of the last four months, with much frequency. After all, the two separate trials were arguably the most newsworthy during that period of time. Similarly, you might have reasonably imagined that the sentencing of 13 thugs earlier today, in what many consider to have been a vicious racist attack on a lone white schoolboy, to be front page news of the highest order. But not so apparently!

Not only does the Bristol Evening Post seem selectively ignorant of crown court proceedings but it also appears totally oblivious to the fact that 13 young thugs have been sentenced following two controversial trials!

One can only wonder if the Post, which is widely perceived as a Labour-sympathetic paper, would have demonstrated a similar level of apathy had the victim/perpetrator roles been reversed – with a young Muslim youth being pulverised by sixteen white youths using a claw hammer? We suspect not! Indeed, we believe the Post would have given the story the greatest of prominence and on a regular basis!

Which all goes to suggest that censorship is not dead – at least not in Bristol!

You can discover what the Bristol Evening Post considers to be the “news” today here . Also do a search for “hammer attack” or “Henry Webster” and see if you can find a single report!

Clearly – as our Regional Voices says – ALL THE NEWS YOU ARE ALLOWED TO KNOW!

Discussion

27 comments for “National ‘papers censor perceived racist Hammer Attack Sentencing story”

  1. As Stalin might have said: “It’s not the news that counts. It’s the news that gets published.”

    Posted by Mister J | May 10, 2008, 1:40 pm
  2. How long have these genocidal attacks on English people to go on? How long can the cowardly MSM continue to conceal the facts that these beatings are happening to young white Britons on a daily basis? And the blame lies squarely on the shoulders of the lib/lab/con governing so-called elite, especially CEHR Chairman Trevor Phillips who only this week publicly stated that certain whites should be treated as less than human. Just imagine if the positons were reversed & a white had made such a statement.

    Has this racist been fired? Or even censured? Indeed he has not. He continues to collect his six-figure salary at the same white taxpayers’ expense. The majority population must make a stand NOW to protect decent, white indigenous Britons against the genocide of our muticultural white-hating masters because it’s obvious to me that some minority groups believe they have been give almost carte blanche to assault white, indigenous Britons.

    Posted by dr dees brainwashing elixir | May 10, 2008, 2:08 pm
  3. The Press-Media are scum..How CAN they keep this from the public ? It’s THEIR version of `Democracy`. If they dont report it, it didn’t happen…have they NO shame? And if they don’t suffer shame, there`s obviously no pride, as long as they keep plugging their one world agenda.

    Despicable,cretins,hand in glove with the LabLibCons…I REALLY am praying for a day of `Reckoning`…God speed BNP.

    Posted by White Lion | May 10, 2008, 2:14 pm
  4. The definitive case of course was that of poor Kriss Donald, victim of the worst ever racially motivated murder in Britain. Outside of Scotland there was a virtual news blackout and the London based hacks seemed to find it as difficult to cross the Scottish border as they would to get into Zimbabwe. Who knows perhaps news censorship to prop up the enriched paradise of diversity is now considered by Zanu Nulab to be a matter of “national security” ?

    “In Britain, a DA-Notice (called a D-Notice until 1993) is an official request to news editors not to publish or broadcast items on specified subjects, for reasons of national security.
    D-Notices and DA-notices are merely a request and therefore not legally enforceable and consequently news editors can choose to ignore them without (in theory) official repercussions, although they are generally accepted by the media.” wiki.

    Probably though it is more a case of self censorship, as similarly practised by the Chinese Communist Party. They don’t need to be told to suppress an item which doesn’t fit with their agenda, they’ve internalised it and just self-censor as part of their programming. In October 2006 Andrew Marr said: “The BBC is not impartial or neutral. It’s a publicly funded, urban organisation with an abnormally large number of young people, ethnic minorities and gay people. It has a liberal bias not so much a party-political bias. It is better expressed as a cultural liberal bias.”. It is a sad situation which would have been perfectly familiar to George Orwell or William Cobbett.

    Unfortunately the MSM does not host an Orwell or a Cobbett; we get gobshites, establishment stooge safety valves, like Littlejohn, Hitchens and the appalling “Gaunty”.

    Posted by Stringbag | May 10, 2008, 2:16 pm
  5. I’m not surprised to hear this, I lived in Bristol for a while and the local papers there seemed blind to the most obvious split in the city among racial/ religious lines.
    Huge parts of the place is 100% Muslim, mainly of Somali origin, living separate lives and worlds apart from claiming housing benefit and imposing thier culture, if not liberal middle class white journalists who refuse to report what is ACTUALLY goin on.
    Madness.

    —-
    Invasion. - Ed.

    Posted by joadjo | May 10, 2008, 2:43 pm
  6. Newspapers and other media outlets are censoring the events that happen in Britain so much now that they have just become another form of brainwashing indoctrination for warped Marxist ideology.They shouldn’t really be called newspapers all the time they withhold the truth or doctor it.

    Posted by MC SE9 | May 10, 2008, 2:58 pm
  7. You can fool some of the people all the time. you can fool some of the people some of the time. But you can’t fool all of the people all of the time.
    People by and large know what kind of people commit these horrendous murders and violent attacks. These people have stereotyped themselves because they do these things, we haven’t stereotyped them. The media is fighting a losing battle trying to hide the truth, and in the proccess making themselves look rather biased.
    Having read these stories, one only needs to see an Asian name of an offender and the truth is out…
    ‘Another racist attack / murder’, on an indigenous Briton.

    Posted by jao7 | May 10, 2008, 3:04 pm
  8. I have every sympathy for young Mr. Webster, and I hope that he gets paid full compensation. However, no money will wipe out the pain he suffered, or will come to suffer. I suffered an assault 12yrs ago, and I still get an occasional headache. One day, in the not too distant future, we will be rid of these people that are covering up these horrendous crimes, as well as the criminals, all gone, and Britain will be all the better for it.

    Posted by whistle | May 10, 2008, 3:22 pm
  9. I hope that no one posts a surprised piece about this censorship on this site, as it means that the first mantra about Multiculturism has not yet been learned. “ONLY WHITE PEOPLE CAN BE RACIST”. Understand this simple fact and you will understand why no ethnic attack on a white person is ever reported in the press as being a racist attack. When I complained to the BBC about the lack of coverage of the hammer attack case compared with certain high profile cases involving black victims, I was told that this was not the case and I was directed to two insignificant articles about the above case on their Radio Wiltshire web site. WOW!!!

    Posted by midenglander | May 10, 2008, 3:35 pm
  10. Stringbag, excellent post. I URGE ALL NATIONALISTS TO STOP BUYING THE NATIONAL NEWSPAPERS. They are censored and do not serve the interests of Native Britons, particularly those who oppose multi-culturalism.

    For me the worst of the worst is the Daily Mail (that I used to buy every single day). It masquerades as the ‘voice of right leaning folk’, yet ignores racist attacks on whites, yet joins the frenzy when their is a racist (or suspected racist) attack on a non-Briton.

    Posted by mostyn | May 10, 2008, 3:43 pm
  11. Having once been alerted to the brainwashing strategy of political correctness, it’s just amazing how the scales fall from your eyes and you can see how the manipulating and the subliminal persuasion operates. It’s like being let into the secrets of trick photography and computer effects - you can never look at a film in the same way again.

    The best way for ordinary folk like us to counter such insidious attack is to spread the message as far as we can and open the eyes of family, friends and acquaintance. Little by little, push back the shrinking boundaries of what is allowable and gently poke fun at those who meticulously toe the line of what WE ARE TOLD is acceptable. At least, if native Britons get the message, we will have the bond of camaraderie and goodwill to sustain us during what is likely to be the dark night of the soul in the not too distant times to come.

    Posted by SheriffofNottingham | May 10, 2008, 3:49 pm
  12. I realy believe the NUJ has driven its members up a Cul-de-sac. Any news that drives decent people into the arms of the BNP must be censored.
    What they never realised is the sheer weight of news that now needs their censoring touch.
    In the end what they have achieved is that the public is on to them - not totally, yet, but daily the numbers rise thanks to this and other pro-white defence sites. As is always the case with rabble like the NUJ. By their actions to deny the BNP the oxygen of publicity. They end up improving our party’s standing.
    I hope some jounalists reading this might kick the NUJ into touch. join a decent union, and start telling the people out there the truth for once.


    Don’t hold your breath. - Ed.

    Posted by baz | May 10, 2008, 4:03 pm
  13. We can lay the blame for all this censored reporting at Labour’s feet and more directly at the feet of Tony Blair. It was he that spearheaded this descent into politically-correct madness and one-world view. His, and now Gordon Brown’s pathetic vision of Britain and how we all must bend to it whatever the cost, even when we know it is not working is nothing short of tyrannical.

    I despise what that grinning idiot Blair started and his fat fool follow-up act have done to this once great country. I hope I live to see the day the BNP rule this land, but by God they’ll have their work cut out sorting out all the horrible mess this worthless spineless government have gotten us into! VOTE BNP.

    Posted by mono | May 10, 2008, 4:23 pm
  14. i find the voice of freedom a pretty good paper,pity we can only get it once a month!.

    Posted by lordhelpuz | May 10, 2008, 4:47 pm
  15. If that kind of half ar**d, pathetic, PC brainwashed reporting & non-reporting isn’t clearly racist, then I don’t know what is!
    No wonder this site’s officially the most hit political website! Common sense people, no matter what their colour, want & should get factual, no nonsense, balanced reporting…The truth, ALL OF IT!

    Posted by ProudBrit | May 10, 2008, 6:04 pm
  16. Slightly off topic, sorry Ed. Having just watched the video of Richard Barnbrook’s first appearance at the London assembly (see Simon Darby’s Blog ) my first thought was how refreshing for someone to stand up and remind the rest of assembly members that he expects nothing other than co-operation from them, he certainly stated his position in a very robust manner that he means business and is here to stay. He mentioned how up to now everybody has been very polite but also made a comment that many of them are very strange people. This guy doesn’t mess about does he. These people will just not know how to handle ‘The Lionheart’ looks like Political Correctness could be a thing of the past in the Assembly? The fireworks have just begun. Long live King Richard! Oh how I would love the BNP to be in Parliament.

    Posted by LANCASHIREMAN | May 10, 2008, 6:14 pm
  17. I’ve been listening to Radio 4 for most of the day but haven’t heard a whisper about this case. Although on Saturday Live, at 9am, they did have a very sensitive interview with Dwayne Brooks, friend of Stephen Lawrence and witness to his murder. So a relevant current case is ignored and we are, yet again, tortured with this ghastly regurgitated guilt-trip foisted upon us by the ultra pc BBC. Is it any wonder I constantly visit the BNP website, it’s like a breath of fresh air!

    Posted by Ashmole | May 10, 2008, 7:44 pm
  18. As is intimated, if it was a cowardly attack by a large gang of white vermin on a single Asian kid, it would be splattered all over the papers etc, liblabconners would be at the scene, denouncing racism whilst holding up a vote lib/lab/con banner.

    Posted by Patriotic Burnley Celt | May 10, 2008, 7:51 pm
  19. I just watched Richard’s first assembly meeting - WOW, the best film I ever saw; nearly 2hrs long :) A must see - get your popcorn out and relax in the presence of one of our country’s finest. I can’t wait for the sequels. I won’t spoil it for those of you who haven’t watched it yet, but for me the idea of a slap-up party at the taxpayers expense is stomach churning.

    Posted by Simon.C | May 10, 2008, 8:51 pm
  20. http://tinyurl.com/47boh9

    Max - I’ll let this through but please put a brief explanation if just posting a link - Tah. Ed

    Posted by max1999 | May 10, 2008, 9:01 pm
  21. This was to be expected but at least they got sentenced.
    And talking about attacks, another priest has been beaten up by muslims:

    http://tinyurl.com/4p9nkn

    Posted by Alex | May 10, 2008, 9:19 pm
  22. On media censorship, I’m afraid this is permanent. My own research includes such diverse topics as: Darwin as a plagiarist; Belgian Congo genocide (late 19th century); the sacking of Peking (turn of 20th century); Jews in USSR (1918 on); defects in cell biology theory (post-second world war); war crimes in Vietnam and Cambodia; 9/11; ‘mad cow disease’ and insecticide connection; and very many other issues. In all cases, once censorship starts, it continues indefinitely, either until an establishment overthrow, or the issue is seen as unimportant. I’m afraid official censorship of race violence against whites, in Europe and elsewhere, and the related misrepresentations in fiction - TV, film - will continue. (Perhaps someone has a theory about the downfall of such ‘paradigms’? — I’d be interested).

    This is the film linked by Simon Darby’s blog:-
    http://www.london.gov.uk/webcast/may08/assembly_090508.asx
    1 hr 40 mins. Unlike BBC sites, it’s freely downloadable. Richard goes straight into the attack - the chairman seems very good. Nick Griffin stated that the officers there have been completely proper and competent.

    Posted by RW | May 10, 2008, 9:22 pm
  23. The BNP has to get factually-correct info-sheets printed off as early as possible and through as many letter-boxes as possible to counter the ‘news by omission’ from the multi-cultified MSM. Absence of this case from the MSM depicted against the reality of what happened to that youngster - mutilated because he is white - will make sure that indigenous Britons waken up to the treasonous war being waged against them.

    -

    We have an info distribution project in the pipeline, Allan.
    I’m unable to say what it is, but it will fulfill the requirement. - Ed

    Posted by Allan@Aberdeen | May 11, 2008, 9:55 am
  24. i remember complaining to the BBc over the lack of coverage of the racist murder of Richard Wheelan. The reply informed me that such an event was common and therefore of little interest to the public. Thus, by the saturation of coverage on Steven Lawrence and Anthony Walker, it would appear that racist attacks on black youths are a rarity while, given the gist of your article and the dearth of coverage on Kris Donald, etc., racist crimes against whites are all too common.

    Posted by Mrs. S. | May 11, 2008, 10:03 am
  25. How would members of the press have felt if it was THEIR child getting his skull caved in?
    I can guarantee that would be all over the papers!

    GOD SAVE THE QUEEN!

    Posted by SimonGB | May 11, 2008, 4:19 pm
  26. That is just typical, sodding labour.

    And I see the ‘people’ who caused the hammer attack were not given life sentences (what a suprise) not!

    And there was a mention of this in the Sun (a very small section admittedly).

    Posted by EnglandxChick | May 11, 2008, 9:12 pm
  27. 12 May 2008. Latest News. “Police said last night that the white, middle-aged man who was inside the bakery at the time has come forward to help.” So we have an indentification of witness by race, but not the attacker. OK then. It’s a done deal, in it? The attacker must be a non-white. What are we going to do with these media manipulators?
    Definition of a NuLabour media friend - “One who is so steeped in filth that they “can pick up up a piece of sh!t by the clean end.”

    Posted by White Rose | May 12, 2008, 9:02 am

Post a comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.