Well surprise, surprise. People in the media are terrified of talking about Common Purpose so you won’t get much out of the “senior editorial staff” involved… or anyone else at the Brussels Broadcasting Corporation either. You can bet odds-on that the “senior editorial staff” were selected for their corruptibility. “Developing knowledge, experience and contacts” means being drawn into the Common Purpose network of saboteurs and subversives in the UK that takes its orders from Brussels. You can find out more about how Common Purpose has corrupted the media here: http://www.stopcp.com/cpmedia.php

This is why the BNP has to be very careful about its future dealings with the BBC. As the BNP’s vote increases, and as MEPs and MPs become elected, the BBC’s ‘ban’ (the BBC argues that only parties with representation in national assemblies and parliaments shall be invited onto current affairs programs) on the BNP will become untenable. This means that the BNP will be invited onto Question Time (BBC1) and Any Questions (radio 4).

I suggest that the BNP boycott the BBC:
1. because the BNP shall state its intention to abolish the BBC for treasonous conduct
2. because the BBC will attempt to sabotage any BNP appearance
3. because the BNP would soon be made to appear part of the establishment as ‘licensed extremists’ - a relief valve but with ultimately no effect.
4. in 1975, Margaret Thatcher refused to participate in the debates with her opponents in the contest for leadership of the Conservative Party - she wanted no association with the ‘old guard’ because she was very different, and was seen to be very different.

The BNP has to keep itself away from the BBC. However, Sky should be examined as a different case.

1996 BBC Charter Section 3.2 C
” The BBC must contain comprehensive , authoritative and impartial coverage of news and current affairs in the UK and throughout the World to support fair and informed debate at local , regional and National levels . ”
Serious breaches of the charter would make the BBC’s contract with all their fee payers null and void.

I originally posted the following, addressed to royalecraig, on the article “Of Pigs and Troughs” but, as it was a bit late and I don’t think he caught it, I shall (with Ed’s permission) repost it here as possibly relevant.

@ royalecraig
I followed up your links as given above, especially the third one. I read the comments on that one and my attention was drawn to the last one from the UK National Defence Association Ltd which I proceeded to investigate on its own links. This group has been gathered together at the behest of Tony Blair (in itself not a good omen) and aims to facilitate a COVENANT to be formed between the people, politicians and armed forces of the UK to decide on the defence and security needs of this realm, the armed forces to include army, navy, airforce, police, coast guard, ambulance (?), fire, rescue and “Security Services” (sic). Don’t the armed forces swear an oath of allegiance to the queen and would this Covenant be subordinate to that or would it take precedence over it?

It will seek members in the media and PR, military charities, defence industries, related businesses and from celebrities and academics. It will be funded by private individuals, industrial corporate bodies, donations and legacies. It will target the entire population of the UK. Its focus will be on “Task, Team, Individual” and it has 10 Commandments.

I think it sounds like Common Purpose of the Armed Forces but perhaps you know more about it and could enlighten us further.

Perhaps anyone else out there could help with further information?

Question:

Why is the BBC using tax-payers money (TV licence = TV tax) to pay for political leadership training and why has no MP raised this abuse of trust in the House of Commons?

This question is rhetorical.

OT but how come I never saw this until it was too late to attend.

http://www.infowars.com

That should read. The BBC, known as, the left-wing Brussels Broadcasting Corporation, admit that many of their staff have received common purpose / communist purpose indoctrination.

If readers to this site do not understand what “Common Purpose” is about. Please go to enclosed link and watch video. This is a very odious Marxist type organisation who need to be watched and reported on. We in the BNP have been aware of this devious secretive free masonry type cult for some time and have not been afraid to speak out, unlike many. It is permeating the rulers in our society and is dangerous in the extreme. This video is quite long so be prepared to have your eyes opened and be shocked at what you hear.

http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=common+purpose&sitesearch=

SheriffofNottingham said: “I think it sounds like Common Purpose of the Armed Forces but perhaps you know more about it and could enlighten us further.

Perhaps anyone else out there could help with further information?”

Common Purpose certainly has a strong foothold in the armed forces. I know for a fact that Common Purpose is particularly strong in the south west of England - especially in Plymouth. They control Plymouth Council AND - this is the frightening thing - Plymouth/Devonport Naval Dockyard. So it is fair to assume that Common Purpose controls other parts of the military. The senior Common Purpose military officers have been so corrupted that they now take orders from Brussels.

I’m sorry Allan@Aberdee, I understand your feelings but I strongly disagree with you.
We pay for the BBC through an extortionate TV licence, we have the right to the party of our choice receiving publicity for TV we pay for. All publicity is valuable, if we deny ourselves the opportunity to get our message across using our supposedly national TV; we are shooting ourselves in the foot and doing exactly what the left-wing has been doing to us successfully for years, keeping us out of the public eye. The BBC is still respected by many patriotic Britons, who still don’t realise that it has been taken over by common purpose / communist purpose. We need to get our message across to them, the people who only watch the BBC news; to do otherwise is playing into the hands of the politically correct brigade.

Bigglez, I don’t believe that any patriotic Britons respect the BBC and no patriotic Briton can be unaware that it is part of common purpose. The BBC’s anti-British bias is well-known and that is the difficulty for the BNP because the BBC would sabotage any appearance by the BNP on Question Time or Any Questions.
I would argue that the BBC’s policy of no-BNP is working FOR the BNP. The BNP is different and is not part of the LibLabCon-machine because we don’t sit on the same panels, mouthing the same phrases, at the same time, with the same grey suits etc. Margaret Thatcher saw this in 1975 and it worked for her, so why not for the BNP?

Seeing as the Freemasons had to open up for all to see, then Common Purpose should be subject to the same open-ness. Open for all to see and report on, with no dark corners for any bits to hide from the general public.

Especially if taxpayers’ money has paid for the training - Ed

I may be swimming against the stream here. Common purpose. brainwashing people in two days.This is like pyramid selling. Only greedy people and those with empty heads can be had. Real brainwashing takes years. The box in the corner has been trying for 40 years with mixed results,after all the BNP membership didn’t fall for it.
We have plenty of enemies and so does our country. The fact that many of them have enrolled on this course doesn’t bother me as much as the thousands of teenagers signing up to military training in Pakistan.
Our government even though it wants us destroyed . Am I bovvered, no. The only common purpose they have is legging it out of the country three months before we take power.

Anyone know the precise wording that’s needed to invoke FOI legislation - there are a couple of questions I’d like to ask my local authority. Cheers for the help folks.

You may get the advice you need here:http://www.lon.ac.uk/foi - Ed

Brysea - Watched the C P link in its entireity It is totlly unbelievable what is going on in our country I am posting the link to all on my mailing list!
Ed:- the BNP must publish what it can about this Cancer in our midst and any ideas what we can all do to combat it. Voting BNP goes without saying , but we are running out of time.

-

We publish and link to many things. JohnnyReb.
Unfortunately however, we have limited means, and a hostile media which denies us the platform which would fully awaken people to the true nature of the eu/lablibcon/islam axis.
We do have some initiatives in the pipeline though.
Meanwhile, spread the word by whatever means you can. - Ed

http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/2125

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=f99_1185836519

For those who want to know just how vile the Common Purpose group is watch this,

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3664960863576873594&q=common+purpose&ei=mxQnSMPfKIa4igLsz7nnCQ

Allan@Aberdeen, It worked for Thatcher because she had a huge rich party machine behind her, financed by extremely rich capitalists who wanted to keep the status quo.
The BNP does not have a fraction of the wealth that Thatcher had available to her and so must use all resources available. Of course the BBC will try to sabotage the BNP, that’s to be expected but it’s all good publicity, the important thing is to remain in the public eye. They tried to sabotage the party political broadcast that they were forced to give the BNP during the local elections, by screening a negative program afterwards but it was so transparent that it must have had very limited effect. Before the local and London elections, in which the BNP did so well, there were still people that believed the BNP were not a legal political party. That has now markedly changed, but don’t underestimate the gullibility of many good people, who are conditioned into believing things by PC left-wing propaganda.

Most newcomers to our site know that there is something seriously wrong in Britain today, or they would n’t be looking at it, but I believe many newcomers are confused by the terminologies and concepts regular users of the site understand and refer to in their posts.
-
Askari, you are one of our most valued contributors. However, I’m not going to allow your comment because its too long, and for no other reason. Sorry old chap. The best way to grab readers attention is to keep it tight, impactive and to the point.
Others, please note. Thanks. - Ed

I have just sent an e-mail to my local MP. asking for details about the money spent on CP by the BBC.
I will keep you posted re his reply.

That’s a joke, Marxist - Common Purpose training is compulsory for all of them, or they dont get the job. Chop any of them through the backbone, anywhere you like and you will find Karl Marx’s signature like a stick of Blackpool rock.

After watching the video link, I feel much better informed and now know who “THEY” are.
With this knowledge it really helps on how to deal with it.

Massive and widespread non-payment of the ”Red Tax” (license fee) is what is required. I am never, I mean never, going to pay one penny more to this disgusting anti-white, Marxist propaganda machine again. We have our own Common Purpose machine - large scale, organised non-payment… anyone with me on this one?

BC: Shouldn’t that be ‘hideously white’? - Ed

I have a lot of sympathy for Allan@Aberdeen’s suggestion of boycotting the BBC. Anybody with experience dealing with it knows it has permanent lying memory sydrome — organisational deceit — as described by Chomsky and others, and experienced by victims of crime, education, legal, police and medical negligence etc etc. Personally I would never deal with them unless I had a watertight guarantee they would publish my own wording and my point of view. Not that they’re likely to ask me.

I suggest [1] insist your view is put across; give the exact wording. If they won’t accept, then decline, and record it on a website.
[2] Take your own video camera and record the event yourself; the scientologist TV programme, where they shadowed a thuggish BBC halfwit, illustrates the idea. (I’m not advocating scientology). Don’t make a big thing of it; it’s the vuisual equivalent of taking your own tape recorder.
[3] Get as much information as you can about the programme, including producers and writers etc, for future reference. If — or rather when — they lie, note the names for the future. And try to establish how much of a programme is prewritten, scripted, and the conclusions predetermined.

I am with Bigglez on the issue of the BNP on BBC programs. Yes they pull every dirty trick under the sun but we and everyone else in the nation are used to that. We must get every opportunity to be on BBC TV. Being on BBC TV means we are news worthy, we have something to say to proper British people, we have enough of the electorate expecting to see us on BBC TV or on any platform we choose.

It means we here and we are here to stay.

What is Common Purpose?
I’ve never heard of it before.

—-
Video/links on http://www.uktabloid.co.uk , or just type ‘Common Purpose’ into your search engine. Be warned, it may make your blood run cold. - Ed.

On the subject of propaganda, I’ve just found
http://www.fabians.org.uk
Fabian Society website. (NB named after Fabius Cunctator, who wanted slow movement towards his desired ends; I think, from memory).

Claims to be a left wing think tank. Has various ‘papers’ - by people like Byrne and a few other politicans. Mostly however by obscure scribblers. Unfortunately despite their vast funding there are no free downloads.

Readers might be interested or amused by
http://fabians.org.uk/publications/publications-news/how-labour-must-reinvent-itself

http://fabians.org.uk/debates/democracy/about
Can We Bring Political Parties Back to Life?
(somewhere there’s ‘Brown must fight for what he believes in’!!! - haha!!)

and
http://fabians.org.uk/publications/books/stopping-the-far-right-how-progressive-politics-can-tackle-political-extremism
supported by Searchlight!

It’s based in SW1 and there’s nothing on its site about its constitution or aims.

Evening Ed. I have a question, and perhaps the answer might be worth an article! To be honest I’d never heard of Common Purpose, in fact I thought it was a PC phrase (embarassed now). I’ve just watched the film on http://www.uktabloid.co.uk/Main%20News.html … titled “No EU -Common Purpose Government”. Towards the end in the questions the presenter of the talk mentions that he believes the muslims are in a sense been set up (manipulated by the EU) and that they will become the modern day Jews and be cast out. Whats the BNP’s “take” on this please?

Hi, Andy - there are at least two scenarios. Either the moslems are being set up as the ‘next Jews’, as suggested by Brian Garresh, or they are going to be given control of the people at local level. Interesting times. - Ed.

Thanks Ed - I believe the chap who gave the talk is very genuine but I’m not sure I can concur with his idea about the muslims, albeit if the EU finally gets its own way we’re all bows and arrows against the lightning (the west against its own technology). It’s like Spectre out of James Bond, only worse.

Parallels between Common Purpose and the Church of Scientology have been cited on articles I’v been reading on the Internet on the topic of Common Purpose.

I joined the Church of Scientology sixteen years ago just to find out the nature of their teachings and its likely psychological effects. Previously, some years ago, I did a course in Human Psychology in which I qualified and naturally am well able to spot attempts at brainwashing and manipulation of free will.

I left the Church of Scientology after six weeks, that is to say, I’d learnt enough to know what their organisation was all about and requested them to remove my name from their list of subscribers. Sixteen years on, I still receive correspondence and invites to meetings etc, which I automatically bin.

Dear me, I was under the impression that “auntie BBC” was totally unbiased and politically neutral. Methinks she may have been “got at”.

—-
Methinks she has. - Ed.

To SheriffofNottingham -
My understanding is that http://www.uknda.org was not set up by Tony Blair nor is it a Common Purpose organisation.

Here you can see UKNDA asking Tony Blair to support UKNDA and to provide more funds to the Armed Forces.
http://www.uknda.org/politics/c-13.html
YOU can see TB’s response is negative, arguing that Britain’s armed forces already receive enough.
UKNDA then politely ask that he become a member when he leaves No 10, this was simply a nicety.
Thus UKNDA was not set up by TB but because of and in spite of, The EU and the traitors in Westminster want the British Armed forces, demoralised or Culled as they are Loyal to Queen, Country and People.
If UKNDA and our Armed Forces were a CP organisation then our troops would have better funding, they would not have to issued with food vouchers, nor would they be living in appaling accomodation, Neither do I believe former Defence Lords would have had to speak out about funding.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=410175&in_page_id=1770

CP Organisations and staff are looked after very well, Our Troops are clearly Not, therefore by Implication they are not CP.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/exclusive-report-soldiers-need-loans-to-eat-report-reveals-825928.html

Honour, Honesty Integrity & Loyalty these are values we all Know as British, Values sadly lacking in Westminster but I believe are the core values of Indigenous British People especially in the British armed Forces.
Although there may be some elements in our Armed forces that are working to a EU Agenda, By and Large Our Military remain Loyal to Queen, Country and us the British People.

I hope I have shown that
UKNDA was not set up By Blair, he refused to offer more support to our troops.
The Offer for him to Join was a Nicety.

Incidentally there is a scheme called Suprise Supplies set up by the Mother of a serving soldier and backed by the Royal British Legion and the Top Brass.

Please DO NOT include Senders address as the Organisers do not wish the Troops to be distracted by feeling obliged to Write Thank you Notes.

Seems as though the BBC tried their best to avoid answering your information request.
A bit strange from an organisation that could probably tell interested parties (of the correct political persuasion) a whole variety of facts and figures e.g. number of gays employed; number of lesbians employed; number of disabled employed; number of BME employed (including individual ethnic groupings); number of positive action programmes to enhance BME participation etc, etc.

Baz,
We underestimate Common Purpose at our peril. The box in the corner has been successfully brainwashing the vast majority of the UK public for decades. CP courses are only offered to candidates amenable to CP’s particular type of idealogical brainwashing, usually young & impressionable people keen to advance themselves in society. A two-day course is ideal for vetting out any reluctant or uncertain candidates & to start the ball rolling, so to speak. The days when brainwashing consisted of standing in front of a group for months or years & saying ‘repeat after me …’ are long gone. It is a very subtle form of psychological conditioning, almost imperceptible to the vast majority who are under its influence.

Morning Ed - a few more questions if I may. Does the BNP view this Common Purpose in the same light as Brian Garresh ? I mean, do you believe this is how the EU intends to gain complete control of and destroy the UK ? Finally, if the answers to my previous questions are yes, then are they employing the same mechanism to assimilate and destroy other Europian nations too ?

Frankly, Andy, the answer is yes - there has to be a common purpose behind an organisation calling itself ‘Common Purpose’. The lablibcon axis is a common purpose. - Ed

I find the low figure of 29 incredibly suspect! Come off it!
Clearly loads more people at the BBC have done the training, it is obvious from their “progammes.”
Common Purpose is very sneaky, and much of the training is paid for through “charities” set up with lottery funding, through large grants. Yuppies are basing their entire champagne-sipping careers on this system of - well I call it “fraud.”
Once you start investigating this, the sums of money involved are staggeringly huge and explain why our public services and traditional charities are in rapid decline.
The Diversity and Leadership Industry is sucking up, hoovering up, astonishing sums of public money and, even if a private firm pays for this training itself, it can be tax deductable so the public still pay - indirectly.
This site needs a Common Purpose area where articles and weblinks can be sent and read by members so this can be investigated. It is through Common Purpose that the EU is infiltrating every walk of British life by stealth. It is without a doubt in my mind, the greatest danger by far that we face, and is behind every, single problem we have and will face!

It strikes me these buggers are more of a world threat than Hitler was. I bet they give our American friends across the duck pond rise for concern. Dont tell me, they are infultrating them too. Dont mean to harp on, but I get the impression I’m not the only one here who needs further enlightenment about this set-up.

Interesting article on the Common Purpose theme, online search for:
Great Britain, Gutted by Stealth.
By The Angry Cheese.

http://tinyurl.com/67bp3k

AndyK, I believe that it was the intention of the shadowy movers and shakers who plan on ruling the world (The New World Order) to set up the Muslims as the new scapegoats instead of the Jews. However Muslims are not behaving as they are supposed to and have hijacked political correctness for their own ends. This has to a great extent happened due to the wealth and influence of Saudi Arabia and the radical Wahabi sect of Islam, which has financed the radicalisation of countless Muslims worldwide. As for Common Purpose (communist purpose), it is very dangerous and we must do everything we can to shine the spotlight of publicity on it, but it is not the only agency that is being used to achieve domination, there are others. We have for many years been under a covert attack on several fronts.

Thanks for that Bigglez. Makes one ask the question. Are the Muslims brainwashing their people in response to the fact that we have a “New World Order” brainwashing ours? The trouble is, out of all this we will end up with only one result, Armageddon.

The Fabian Society mentioned above, was founded by Communists as a precursor to the Labour Party and helped it to gain acceptance and power in the early 20thC. It also founded the London School of Economics. There has been no leader of a Labour Party who has not also been a member of the Fabian Society. Very strong links are maintained today.

I won’t bang on about Common Purpose; I think we all know where we stand with that organisation.

What I would be interested to know, and I wonder if any reader can help me on this, is:
How many members of the Monetary Policy Committee have links with Common Purpose, the London School of Economcs and the Fabian Society?

leedslass - why don’t you use the Freedom of Information Act to ask them.
Their names can be found here : http://tinyurl.com/6738tj - Ed

@ royalecraig

Thank you for devoting your time to answering my questions and I am delighted to hear that my fears are unfounded. The trouble in this day and age is that much of what you see and hear is false and it is not always easy to separate the sheep from the goats. Thank God, then, that someone is sticking up for our boys’ interests.

I just found (via ‘biased BBC’) a site based in Skipton with quite a bit about Common Purpose on it:-
http://www.cremationofcare.com/the_nwo_common_purpose.htm
It has links with - helpfully - quite a bit of explanatory matter. Some is about Brian Gerrish who seems more or less single handedly to have started the concerns over all this.

Thanks for the link, RW - Ed.

Done. I would have copied you in to it but thought a bnp email address might be a bit of a giveaway! I’ll let you know what response, if any, I get.

AndyK, a limited Armageddon may well be one of the possibilities in store for us. There are some devilishly clever brains behind Globalisation and they have no doubt envisioned many possible scenarios / outcomes and have plans for all of them. The ultra rich have little fear of limited nuclear warfare between Islam and the West. They have their nuclear shelters and supplies and they will survive in comfort and now there are drugs and nano-technology to combat radiation and cancer available to them.

The would be rulers of the ‘New World Order’ are not just one faction. There are factions within factions, plots within plots and layers upon layers, each puling in different directions, each striving for dominance and stabbing each other in the back. An example of this on a small scale is the battle for dominance between Blair and Brown. This is the only thing that has slowed them down so far, this and the last bastion of freedom of speech, the Internet, which they have appeared to underestimate, but they are catching on to that too.

PS: The ‘New World Order’, is merely a label used to simplify descriptions.

royalcraig,

The Rabbit Hole goes much deeper than many want to look.

People need to think how we got in this state, in the first place, and how and why we are routinely robbed and coerced, by force, by our so-called servants.

Surely….this cannot be allowed, if they have admitted to this then can’t the BNP do anything? I know you’re not the police and it isn’t your duty but…well you’re the only people who really can do anything.
Common Purpose - I looked it up and found alot of…unhealthy things, Discrimination is illegal is it not? Well seeing as I’m sure it’s aimed at the British then of course it’s not illegal, we don’t have rights do we?

‘Some are more equal than others’, Mr K - Ed

@ LivicTech

I am intrigued by your post but I don’t understand it. Can you put it a bit more clearly, please?

Thanks for your followup Bigglez. I’m full of questions at present - and disturbed. As Ed mentioned earlier - some of this stuff makes the blood run cold.

Another film at ….
http://www.uktabloid.co.uk/Main%20News.html

This time titled “Last Christmas - Police State”, where they claim that after 2009 there effectively won’t be any parliament. Evidently only one MP out of several asked are aware of this. Is his true ? If so, then how will any party stand a chance of saving this country ?

We and our Children are or will be nothing but Cannon Fodder for the Global Elite.
The Iraq War was based on Lies that Blair and MI6 knew about.

http://www.livevideo.com/video/rclark23/1E8F485B900C44498E90AD06E7088446/-war-criminal-ex-mi6-head-dea.aspx

Incidentally there are Police Investigations against Blair and Goldsmith.
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=oDsUxph5nBk#mve8czJIoTk

Now we are constantly told that Iran has threatened to wipe Israel off the Map and quite rightly people now see Iran as a World security threat, but wait, dig a little deeper and you find that what The Iranian leader really said was wipe Zionism off the Political Map, a bit like me saying Blairism should be eradicated.

The Wipe Isreal off the Map Hoax.
http://prisonplanet.com/articles/january2007/260107offthemap.htm

Now Somebody appears to be deliberately stirring things up in the Mid East.
The Global Elite, obviously want a war with Iran, using our children as Cannon Fodder.

http://www.robert-fisk.com/articles579.htm

http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/israel/blackops.html

http://judicial-inc.biz/Israel_in_Iraq.htm

Information like this begs the question ( assuming it is true of course ) How many of these IED devices killing and maiming our troops off in Iraq / Afghanistan are NOT caused by Iraqi or Afghan Insurgents, but by ‘Dark Forces’ who are supposedly on our side.

Personally I’d much prefer to trade with Iran than to wage war and steal THEIR OIL, hell I’m not even sure that with a bit of imagination (like Reducing the Population) we couldn’t be self sufficient, at least till we got a sensible balance between renewables, Biofuels and an occasional Nuclear Site, ( Preferably sited in ED’s Back garden rather than mine ;-) ).

Unplug yourselves, your Friends, Collegues and Relatives from the Matrix.

Make it shorter, next time, rc, or you’ll be sited in my back garden - Ed.

I came across PA Consulting
http://www.paconsulting.com/Home
and
Atos Origin
http://www.atosorigin.com/en-us/About_Us/Company_Profile/default.htm
…today. They’re two more global companies providing ‘assistance’ to the government. One is involved with ID cards and the other with the collection of ‘fines’.

We all know we’re being stitched up for something really bad but the question is what can we do? Bigglez is right to say that all possible scenarios and outcomes will have been projected and taken into account. If you actually look at the mechanisms being put in place, eg EuroGendFor, you’ll see we can’t leave it too late. What can an unarmed people do against armed fascists?

Have a look at this - it’s a very short essay that details Mussolini’s ‘Third Way’ government:
http://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/Fascism.html

Blair’s Third Way politics was also a triangulation between capitalism and commumnism:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third_Way_(centrism)

And if anyone wants to find out how we got into this mess, have a quick look at the Hegelian Dialect:

http://www.calvertonschool.org/waldspurger/pages/hegelian_dialectic.htm
http://www.crossroad.to/articles2/05/dialectic.htm
http://nord.twu.net/acl/dialectic.html

I’ve just found this while looking for something else. The MP for Gateshead East (on the Labour website),

[quote][b]Sharon is a Common Purpose graduate [/b] and was delighted to be able to go back and contribute something to the course. She was invited to speak to the latest graduates and It was great to see so many people benefiting from the work Common Purpose does. As an international leadership programme they can really help build peoples’ confidence and develop their skills careers.[/quote]

http://www.labouronline.org/wibs/165849/working_hard_for_you?PageId=01123022-90c7-a8b4-6d92-a75588a3a3e2

I want my license fee back!
I don’t like the BBC-KGB with its C/P propaganda and communist agenda.
BNP, the eyes and ears for us people, keep watching the treacherous scum!

Some time ago, I posted an email here, based on my local experiences, suggesting the idea of common purpose is to get business and town planning etc people in an alliance to get what’s left of public assets privatised (by outfits like Capita), in rather the same way the NHS has been. I saw another email unrelated to mine with the same suggestion. Maybe at the local level this is true; it occurs to me that perhaps at the governmental level it’s also intended to grab all publically owned assets, too. It’s a working hypothesis anyway.

The comment below was made by the BBC on the 14th May 2008.

“If you don’t protect your trademark, it’s taken away from you” - and Doctor Who is massive for the BBC

BBC Worldwide spokesman

What a gem !

I think from now on that should be quoted back at the BBC.

“If you don’t protect your race and culture, it’s taken away from you”