News Archive

BBC Traitors cross the line!


From Today’s Sun Newspaper:

THE BBC is to accuse the most highly decorated battalion in the Army of torturing and executing six Iraqi prisoners in cold blood. The allegations include claims that a 14-year-old boy was garrotted and a man was shot point-blank in the head. Flagship programme Panorama will claim the prisoners were murdered after being captured during a bloody battle in 2004.

The shootout, dubbed the Battle of Danny Boy after a checkpoint where it took place, saw the first bayonet charge in 20 years. Soldiers from the 1st Battalion, the Princess of Wales’s Royal Regiment won a Conspicuous Gallantry Cross and two Military Crosses for their bravery.

The accusations, to be aired on Monday, have caused fury among top brass who believe they were fabricated by militants to embarrass the British Government.

Investigations by both the Royal Military Police and International Red Cross have found NO atrocities had taken place. And a senior defence source said: “What the BBC are going to do is a disgrace.”

In six months in Iraq 1PWRR lost two dead, 48 wounded and won 30 medals – including a VC earned by L/Cpl Johnson Beharry two weeks before Danny Boy. There is no suggestion of any allegations involving him.

The claims have been made by nine fighters from the fanatical Medhi Army, who have taken on antiwar lawyer Phil Shiner to push their case in Britain. The battle erupted near hotspot town Majar al Kabir when a company from 1PWRR went to the rescue of an underfire unit. As the ambushers were well hidden in deep ditches, Our Boys assaulted them with bayonets.

Afterwards 20 enemy dead were taken back to base. The Iraqis claim six were still alive on arrival but executed overnight, with a boy strangled. A BBC spokesman insisted the programme was still under discussion, adding: “We are examining a range of things.”

Tory MP Patrick Mercer, an ex-Army officer, said: “It is totally unacceptable.”

Share this page:

Add to del.icio.us Add to Diggit Add to Yahoo Add to Google Add to StumbleUpon Add to Facebook Add to MySpace
What do these buttons do?

Discussion

64 comments for “BBC Traitors cross the line!”

  1. Although war can be cruel and a lot can happen in the heat of the moment, the BNP should realize there’s no point defending brutality by our soldiers if it is proved to have happened.

    Having said that, the BNP should be relentless in attacking the BBC’s constant attempts to dig up dirt on our hard-pressed troops, who have been put into a position where they can do no real good.

    The BNP should also attack the BBC’s apparent connections with parasitical lawyers and ‘human rights’ groups who see this as merely a chance to fatten up at the expense of the long-suffering British taxpayer.

    Posted by Karl Baxter | February 21, 2008, 8:36 am
  2. This will only give the offended one,s something else to be offended by.

    Posted by robstew48 | February 21, 2008, 9:00 am
  3. Last year I wrote to this filthy Marxist propaganda machine, and told them I will NEVER pay the license fee (Tax?) again. I am surely vindicated now. The institutions of this land are finished, and I do not recognise the BBC, the EU, the UN, NATO, or this Communist government and it’s various departments. Blair’s favourite book was by Trotsky, Brown is a Leninist, and the whole country from top to bottom is controlled by a dark alien group of capitalists and media barons. This programme is only being shown for one reason - to ensure a Balkan type fracture, and unrest between Muslims and Christians. I’m taking no part in this system whatsoever, and reject the whole damn edifice.

    Posted by BC1959 | February 21, 2008, 9:29 am
  4. BBC! Supposed acronym for british broadcasting corporation? How about renaming it BROWNS BETRAYAL COERTS! I think its about time we withdrew our license money en mass! You never know maybe then the new so called super prisons might then be built to house us all!

    Posted by woody1456 | February 21, 2008, 9:40 am
  5. What else do you expect from the BBC?

    Over many years we have heard about the savagery of Islamic terrorists. They routinely multilate bodies, remember our MP’s in Basra? What about the beheading of Ken Bigley? The bodies ripped apart on the London transport system. The torture and beheading of Daniel Pearl. The terrorist outrages in Israel - see this

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?p=050645859600C810&index=6&feature=PlayList&v=PkC_2NwyoWE

    its very hard to watch.

    But never any outrage from the BBC. Often they even censor the news and we have to search the internet for the real facts.

    The BBC should be dismantled and sold off. We should DEFINITELY not have to pay a licence fee to fund this bunch of Quislings.

    Posted by Tancred | February 21, 2008, 9:45 am
  6. Phil Shiner. Sounds like he needs a couple of shiners. As for the bbc, they need to be hit hard for this. My licence fee has just been cancelled.

    Posted by oldsoldier | February 21, 2008, 9:50 am
  7. The BBC pull the same trick with Palestinians in order to blame Israel.
    Words cannot describe the wickedness of the BBC!

    Posted by Dylan | February 21, 2008, 9:52 am
  8. Do the liberal cowards know the meaning of the word war?

    Posted by the likes of us | February 21, 2008, 10:15 am
  9. I hasten to add; The BBC, an ingenius if accidental recruiting agent for our party.

    Posted by the likes of us | February 21, 2008, 10:36 am
  10. BBC= The enemy within!

    Posted by Brysea | February 21, 2008, 10:45 am
  11. The News side of the BBC seems to contaminate everything about the Corporation - which is a real shame. They make some good programmes (without the ads) and if they took the News and also all of the crazy political and ethnic (over)correctness out of the BBC, I might even subscribe to it voluntarily one day - if the price was right.

    It is fast becoming hideously non white and unrepresentative of the mainstream indiginous population. It is full of token this and that and uncomfortable to watch - for me anyway. Unfortunately, a lot of the channels are going the same way, buckling under pc pressure.

    It’s very wrong that we don’t have a choice in whether or not to subscribe because they would not dare to make a traitorous programme like this Panorama. They deliberately seek and court contoversy, knowing it cannot affect their subscription numbers. With all the channels now available and a lot of people not watching the BBC, scrapping the license fee is well overdue.

    Who gives a monkey’s what the Medhi Army think and say anyway? And who is paying antiwar lawyer Phil Shiner - us I’ll bet? The first casualty of war is truth and we should never forget that. Whether there is a grain of truth or not in these ’seeking compensation’ allegations, I could not care less. War is often a mess and brutal and if these Medhi Army lot don’t like it, then don’t join in.

    Posted by Winston | February 21, 2008, 10:48 am
  12. Are you sure the head of the bbc isnt a BNP member?
    Just days after announcing the BNP is the most visited political website it runs this program?
    I’m beginning to think that the bbc GENUINELY cant see outside its own building???
    This program is going to enrage the nation in quite the opposite way they hope!
    Hence 1000’s more votes for us.
    I dont pay my license anymore but I might start now,
    Mr Griffin must be clapping his hands.

    Many new members cite the BBC as one of their motivations for joining - Ed

    Posted by sickofitall | February 21, 2008, 11:01 am
  13. Posted by Dylan | February 21, 2008, 11:06 am
  14. Hi Folks

    I’ve not written anything for a long time .. but in view of the circumstances in Great Britian I should make comment.

    The first battle has been LOST, yes LOST !
    My homeland looks more and more like an Islamic State every day ,it has been betrayed by those entrusted by its people to protect it.

    There is only one chance for Britain to be Great again, and that is to support the BNP.

    What do I mean by support the BNP?
    Well let me expain.

    Either you vote BNP at the next General election or kiss goobye to your nation, heritage and your future

    If you dont the march of Islam will be unstoppable and your grand daughters will live behind the veil

    Its your choice VOTE BNP or Become an Islamic State!

    Atropos, Melbourne Australia

    G’day and thanks for your comment, Atropos - Mod

    Posted by atropos | February 21, 2008, 11:07 am
  15. Thanks to the botched, illegal invasion launched by the war criminal British government Islamist militias have launched a reign of terror in Basra:

    “In one folder at the Basra police station, the young woman in the autopsy photograph seems to be straining upward in agony, her eyes popping in terror. She is “female unknown identity, found in Hayer Hussein neighbourhood, behind the electric station. 24/8/2007”.

    In another, a woman’s nose has been crushed. Trails of blood run from her closed right eye like lines of tears. She is “female unknown identity, found in Al-Mishraq al-Jaid neighbourhood, behind the car dealer. 7/11/2007”.

    And apparently criminal elements are integral to the Mahdi army:

    “The government is trying to support the forces in Basra,” said Ali Dabbagh, its spokesman. “We’re not trying to hide the fact that there is a threat in Basra, but we think most of the threat is coming from organised criminal gangs who are hiding behind the slogans of JAM [local shorthand for the Mahdi Army].”

    http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/iraq/article3056726.ece

    But naturally the PC BBC believes the word of murderers of women, killed for the crime of going out uncovered, and criminal gangs against that of our brave soldiers. Well they would, wouldn’t they?

    Naturally there is a publicity seeking, leftist lawyer pumping it up. And the enticing prospect of “compensation” and fat, juicy legal fees no doubt.

    Let’s just remind them of the basics, the Army did not want to invade Iraq. They were deceived and ordered into it by war criminals Blair, Brown, Straw, Hoon………….

    “If you dont the march of Islam will be unstoppable and your grand daughters will live behind the veil”

    And foully murdered if they don’t, atropos

    Posted by neversurrender | February 21, 2008, 11:23 am
  16. Years ago, when I was in the armed forces, I was friendly with an RAF photographer who served in Aden, during the war and before our disgraceful retreat.

    It was my friends job to photograph every inch of any person shot and killed by our soldiers.

    The reason? When the body was returned to its home and family, it was not unusual for the ‘peaceful natives’ to mutilate the body in order to claim greater compensation from the then Labour government and also to lodge claims of brutality against the British Army for their propoganda purposes.

    It seems history may be repeating itself, only this time with the full co-operation of the BBC.

    The sooner this, not fit for purpose, organisation is dismantled, the better.

    Posted by Grumpygit | February 21, 2008, 11:43 am
  17. BBC = Blair Brown and Cameron

    Posted by Karl Baxter | February 21, 2008, 12:05 pm
  18. British Broadcasting Corporation?
    Makes the word, “British” stick in my throat!
    Absolutely disgraceful. Never watch B.B.C. news on principal.

    Posted by Despairing Dan | February 21, 2008, 12:05 pm
  19. I served in Iraq and Afganistan, and I doubt these claims. I’m not going to name my regiment for security reasons but I was part of the first wave of Royal Marines that stormed Basra.
    Sometimes enemy soldiers that surrender can be not be captured and are killed. It’s hard to explain but sometimes it is impossible or very dangerous to capture surrendering enemy troops. We often had to cap very badly injured enemy soldiers on operations, it is either that or leave them screaming in agony …. what do they want.
    Sometimes I wonder whether politicians really understand what war is really like. War is vile and should be the last resort.
    I didn’t witness any brutality at all from our troops. I did however witness an American marine that had been crucified alive by Iraqi insurgents … can we claim compensation for this?

    Ed Says: Great point! Tell your friends about Abex.org.uk ; )

    Posted by richard978 | February 21, 2008, 12:07 pm
  20. By intimidating us into paying for the Blair/Broon Brainwashing corporation, the government
    is doing the equivalent of shooting us and making us pay in advance for bullets.

    Posted by Noel | February 21, 2008, 12:11 pm
  21. Regarding sickofitall’s comments about the head of the BBC being a BNP member:

    Yes, it’s true that the BBC is unwittingly helping us by shoving multiculturalism down people’s throats, but they do this in the entirely sincere but insane hope that it will make everybody love each other.

    This is what is called ‘contact theory’ and is what is behind attempts to ‘integrate’ schools in America. The theory is that forcing different kinds of people together makes them recognize their…ahem…’common humanity’ and learn to love and espect each other.

    The facts on the ground prove quite the opposite. Pushing different groups together creates tensions and animosities. That’s why borders were created and will always be needed and that’s why parties that believe in implementing borders will ultimately triumph. The BBC are our useful idiots.

    Posted by Karl Baxter | February 21, 2008, 12:13 pm
  22. Its getting beyond being a joke with the BBC now.

    Do the news readers who are supposed to be serious journalists never question their conscience as to the bias anti British bile they are broadcasting.

    Posted by darkmatter | February 21, 2008, 1:01 pm
  23. It’s not necessary to view this latest piece of sensationalist anti-British propaganda, to realise that it’s a pack of lies concocted by Islamists who as we already know will stoop to the very bottom of any cesspit in order to besmirch the name of real soldiers who defeated them against the odds. They’ve given themselves an interestingly large amount of time to put it together, and of course they can always rely 100% on the slavering pack of hyenas who call themselves ‘lawyers’ and who worship money and regard justice as something to be abused at will for their own despicable ends.

    I wouldn’t be surprised if this is designed to be a replacement media circus for al-Fayed’s rapidly disintegrating ‘case’ against everyone from the late Princess of Wales to the entire royal family to police officers to MI6 to bodyguards and practically every British person on the planet. That individual belongs in a mental hospital and it should be a private one paid for by himself after he has issued a full and unconditional apology to the countless people he has offended, prior to being deported.

    Call me Mr. Prejudiced, but I already think this Shiner slimebag is a corrupt, publicity- and money-grabbing opportunist barrel-scraping traitorous crook. If he thinks decent people are going to take the word of a bunch of Mehdi Army terrorists over that of the RMP and the International Red Cross, then he is a total moron. Correction: he’s a moron in any case. Sue me you slithering reptile - you could get your hands on my old car or my digital radio.

    If the BBC actually give this airtime well then anyone anywhere will be free to make up accusations of any kind in an attempt to damage the good name of this country. There is nothing wrong with legitimate investigations but common sense says you don’t fill your own airwaves with enemy propaganda! So whose side is the BBC on? From what the Securtiy Services said the other day, that is an open question.

    Posted by apendragon | February 21, 2008, 1:11 pm
  24. The BBC operate safe in the knowledge that their licence Fee from the British public is guaranteed.
    “We have got your money now, what are going to do about it ?”

    The fee is in effect a type of protection racket that the mafia would operate.
    It is time some enterprising individual started up a web site about the BBC highlighting their parasitical lie machine.

    Posted by x1 | February 21, 2008, 1:55 pm
  25. There should be a civil disobedience movement set up, not to pay the license fee. They can’t lock us all up.

    Posted by Miller13 | February 21, 2008, 1:59 pm
  26. The Liberal traitors know full well that they can broadcast/print any lie they wish and Islamic automatons full of righteous (HA!) indignation will lap it up and dash for their bombs, rifles and RPG’s. This is a deliberate ploy to recruit more Muslim fanatics to the terrorist element of the jihad against Great Britain. The treacherous toad Piers Morgan did exactly the same to our boys when he printed a pack of stinking lies about torture of detainees in that rag he once worked for. It doesn’t matter to the commissars of the state controlled media that better men and women than them pay the ultimate price, so long as it serves the ‘common purpose’ of the Lib/Lab/Con alliance and creates a single prescribed religion for the EUSSR.

    Posted by trueblueloyalist | February 21, 2008, 3:44 pm
  27. Posted by baccy_tin | February 21, 2008, 3:45 pm
  28. If you pay Licence fee by standing order or direct debit then cancel it and pay by cheque every quarter and write on the back something like “Paid under protest by a British Patriot who denounces the pro-Islamic stance of the BBC”. Nothing illegally offensive.
    It will take some time to do it and cost a bit but it is a sure way of them getting the message !!

    Posted by jamesct | February 21, 2008, 4:01 pm
  29. X1 said “It is time some enterprising individual started up a web site about the BBC highlighting their parasitical lie machine.”

    It already exists:

    http://www.biased-bbc.blogspot.com

    Posted by Artorius | February 21, 2008, 4:32 pm
  30. Is anyone actually surprised by this? For over 30 years the BBC portrayed the IRA as legitimate freedom fighters engaged in a just cause! They totally overlooked the FACT that they were nothing more than a bunch of Marxist sectarian killers who targeted anyone of the Protestant religion in Ulster. People in Northern Ireland referred to the BBC as the RBC (Republican Broadcasting Corporation) because of its absolute bias towards Irish Republicans. Now the BBC has become the defenders of Islam and the proud soldiers of the British Army are easy prey. Will anyone care in the BBC if there is no substance to their propaganda against our boys overseas. You must be joking! The question that should now be taken very seriousy is why we, the British people of our Kingdom have to pay for this 3rd rate television company!

    Posted by Loyal and True | February 21, 2008, 4:36 pm
  31. Maybe the BBC feels that it has the right to show this programme, but I shall not watch it. Our troops, in my view, deserve all the respect that we can give them, and I cannot for the life of me see how these allegations could happen. But what anoys me even more is that the BBC is giving prime airtime to the Mehdi Army, whose rampant killing is not as vehemently reported.
    I truly despair, but expect nothing more from a government full of solicitors who, to a man and woman, have never fired a shot in anger. Same goes for the BBC board

    Posted by tetleyteaman | February 21, 2008, 5:10 pm
  32. Not suprisingly as the goverment is probably ’secretly’ running the bbc.
    If you are fed up with the pm’s comunism see this petition - petitions.pm.gov.uk/dictatorpm

    Posted by Corrupt Britain | February 21, 2008, 5:19 pm
  33. Isn’t there a Mail page where Sue Lawley admits, yes we are Biased, on that admission alone there ought to be a case for Not paying the License fee.

    http://youtube.com/watch?v=-dPhymHlcwU

    Posted by royalecraig | February 21, 2008, 5:37 pm
  34. I don’t understand, these brave soldiers not only saved the lives of others but also charged with bayonets! I seriously doubt that the BBC has any idea of how big your balls have to be to do that. In spite of this couragous act, they are still going to broadcast this damning program about an unproven crime that I personally wouldn’t give a crap about if it actually happened. Do you think that Muslims would would care if the Mehdi Army had executed our soldiers?……………….I thought not.

    Posted by magical trevor | February 21, 2008, 6:00 pm
  35. We must campaign to have all public money going to the BBC stopped.

    Pensioners to be exempt from License Fee. Is this in the BNP Manifesto?

    To achieve this VOTE BNP

    Posted by ianpenrhyndd | February 21, 2008, 6:20 pm
  36. Try to imagine our political leaders, the board of the BBC and the people who made this Panorama programme under fire in Iraq or Afghanistan. You can almost hear their screams,see the tears running down their faces and watch as they throw their weapons in the air and run in the opposite direction of the enemy.
    Our troops did not ask to fight in these wars but they are doing what is asked of them by politicians who would not consider putting themselves or their children in the firing line.
    War is a dirty business and as Richard978 said (who was actually there and knows what he is talking about) vile things sometimes have to be done.
    If our politicians are really concerned about what is going on then let them recall our troops and put them to the far better use of securing and patrolling the borders of this country. Oh, I forgot, they will not do this because that is what the vast majority of the indigenous population want them to do and we can’t have that, can we.

    Posted by laserman | February 21, 2008, 6:58 pm
  37. As someone has already said on this very site:

    The BBC is the propaganda arm of the Establishment in general and Nu Labour in particular - should we expect anything different from them?

    Posted by troubleatmill | February 21, 2008, 7:56 pm
  38. If i were a soldier working for this couldn’t care less about you Queen and Government i would be getting out asap.
    Broon sends them to war with no equipment to win the hearts and minds of murdering scum that would slit your throat as soon as look at you.
    War is a bloody occupation, if you dont like what you see, then dont send our brave boys and girls to war to do the dirty work you wouldn’t do yourself.
    There’s enough work here for them keeping islamic militant terrorists at bay.

    Posted by NEMESIS | February 21, 2008, 8:57 pm
  39. If it happened as the BEEB protray then questions need asked, even in the heat of battle.

    BUT, if this is more BEEB BULLSH1T then LL those soldiers should come back with ALL their kit and make their way straight to the offices of those responsible for this programme…………………and re-educate them as to the realities of war!

    Either way this will be an excuse for more “moderates” to take to the streets calling for the deaths of us all and encouraging more hotheads to seek violence against us. .. Of course if these soldiers had been SLAUGHTERED….., nahhh the Beeb would never make such a programme about THAT would they!

    Posted by charlie | February 21, 2008, 9:01 pm
  40. Not given the liberal/lefts mouth piece a penny in 19yrs.

    http://www.tvlicenceresistance.info

    Posted by Defiant | February 21, 2008, 9:50 pm
  41. Why don’t they air this video instead, it’s about the opression of women in islamic countries. The video is very graphic, as it is often the case with muslims.

    http://www.terrorismawareness.org/videos/108/the-violent-oppression-of-women-in-islam/

    Posted by Alex | February 21, 2008, 10:03 pm
  42. The danger is, of course, that when if these accusations are subsequently shown to be false, and even if the BBC is then forced to publish a retraction, the damage will have been done. People will remember the programme and the The British Army will be associated with the most serious mis-conduct.

    Posted by Ernald | February 21, 2008, 10:13 pm
  43. The thing is, when it all kicks off as it inevitably will, because of their stupid forced upon us ideas. We know what they look like and where they are. And people are so upset that during the chaos of it all they are going to make sure that their stupid ideas never get to see the light of day ever again.

    Posted by militarycoup | February 21, 2008, 10:25 pm
  44. It is simple - if you do not agree with the lies of the BBC, Do not buy a TV license. You need a TV license to watch BBC and commercial broadcast tv programs. No license is needed to listen to BBC radio or commercial radio. Many people ditch the TV and are much happier without it. BBC radio has also lost the plot - so listen at your own risk!

    Posted by BNPFORME | February 21, 2008, 11:33 pm
  45. i know this is off topic but i cant seem to post it anywhere else
    this is from the ABC website in Australia

    http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2008/02/22/2169449.htm?section=justin

    When will it end!!!

    Posted by aussiebrit | February 22, 2008, 1:33 am
  46. I listened to the BBC Radio news at 6.00pm last night with my bias detector switched on as a result of reading this BNP article and contributing to it. Normally it is on standby, and I suppose that unfortunately many people do not have this lie sifting apparatus so they are comprehensively deceived by what passes for received wisdom.

    But if you do have a bias detector and it is switched on the “cultural liberalism” comes through loud and clear. Several items indicated this strongly. They broadcast Lord Roberston, Labour macine politico and former NATO Secretary General, sententiously declaring that the West must stay the course and win in Afghanistan because otherwise “Afghanistan will come to our streets”, as though these were words of wisdom inscribed on a tablet of stone. There was no hint of qualification to these remarks along the lines of 1) The West is not going to “win” in Afghanistan, where winning in any case can hardly be meaningfully defined 2) Afghanistan has already been brought to our streets by the Pakistani colonisation of so many of them, and we can only expect much worse as things stand.

    Following this there was a patronising reference to President Sarkozy’s efforts to get the EU to protect European industry from cut price East Asian competition. Free trade, so called, is an article of faith with the PC BBC, it grievously damages our country, it destroys our indigenous working people, it fills the pockets of the finance capitalist class and gives their liberal hangers on a warm rosy glow inside. France, which has not pursued the treacherous LibLabCon economic course of the past 30 years particularly, has of course much more to protect than we do. It is is plain looking at our ex-manufacturing districts that these hardly qualify as first world areas any more. And that more of the same toxic liberal economic medicine will result in us slipping out of First World status altogether within a decade or so.

    But there was not a hint of these highly pertinent considerations on the BBC news item, rather they got a smooth FO type to respond that what was required was “a pull on the rope” in the opposite direction to President Sarkozy’s wise protectionism and support of home industry. The liberal bias in favour of nation destroying “free trade”, and implicitly of the mass migration they really, really love, was startingly clear.

    They topped off their effort with a medical practitioner quoted declaring portentously that the epidemic of binge drinking is now serious that the government must get together with those public benefactors from the supermarkets and price raise the scourge of cheap alcohol out of existence. Fair enough , it is a serious problem now. But there was not a hint of context, how LibLabCon has colluded with their friends in big business to destroy our rich, traditional public house culture which was so vital to the health of the nation, still is, and could be very much more so. The destruction of our nation’s real economy, the greedy hyper-capitalist devil take the hindmost, free for all, has caused our people to despair. Is it any wonder then that they seek to blot out reality with the bottle and grievously harm themselves and those close to them in the process? The future of our young people is desperate, their sense of identity has been completely trashed by the cultural liberal guilt ridden Year Zero, whereby our nation and its many great achievements are constantly denigrated. Young people now, and will increasingly, find the prospect of getting a decent job with decent working conditions and decent pension receeding rapidly over the horizon. Their prospect of having a decent home and hence family life of their own has become a sick joke. No suprise then that, tragically, so many are drinking and drugging themselves into oblivion and premature death. Again no hint of context from the BBC here, it might be a bit embarrasing.

    The PC BBC operate on a fairly narrow set of liberal pre-conceptions, mentally they have boxed themseves in. More than likely their brain-washing has gone so far they have brain-washed themselves and they simply don’t know that they are doing it. They are so divorced from the majority of our people and, critically, from our nation’s history, that they have no other frame of reference. For those with a well developed bias detector you can’t have it turned up all the time, it is too jarring and galling an experience quite frankly.

    Posted by neversurrender | February 22, 2008, 9:21 am
  47. “West must stay the course and win in Afghanistan because otherwise “Afghanistan will come to our streets”

    Where does this guy live then because it’s already on our streets. The government has been letting Muslims in who hate the west for years

    Posted by Defiant | February 22, 2008, 11:37 am
  48. I notice the BBC has been spelling the name of the ‘prophet’ with an ‘a’ instead of an ‘e’ before the ‘d’. As far as I am aware, the normal English spelling is with an ‘e’ not an ‘a’.

    Of course, this would have nothing to do with St. John and his numbers, would it? They wouldn’t deliberately change the spelling to alter the numbers, now would they?

    Posted by apendragon | February 22, 2008, 12:22 pm
  49. Ernald is right , remember the front page photos showing what appeared to be our troops urinating on Iraqi prisoners?
    Proved to be a set up by some TA lads getting money out of the “media” who are always trying to knock our country!
    There are I believe, certain left wing mostly Muslim lawyers from this country who actively encourage people to make claims. They use the usual “human rights bulls*** laws” and do it at our expense on the legal aid! These vultures are making literally millions of pounds out of our country whilst destroying it!
    When will the British public learn to get rid of this cancerous government?

    Posted by EXCOLONIAL | February 22, 2008, 12:40 pm
  50. EXCOLONIAL the first thing I thought when I seen those images was FAKE.
    Those guys were whiter than white (in the middle east!) plus it was the mk1 SA80’s.
    Trust a liberal/left rag to fall for it.

    Posted by Defiant | February 22, 2008, 5:12 pm
  51. How can the BBC do this? What happened to sticking behind our troops? And to listen to the terrorists? Were they not the people who drilled a young lad to death? And their death squads killing civilians?

    Support our boys, remember “Queen and Country”, the British Army are what made this country, don’t let them be run down the same way our police service has been!

    Posted by The Brave Will Stand | February 22, 2008, 6:29 pm
  52. The BBC by running this story is not going to change the followers of the religion of peace. They already hate us and our way of life. Bombing us in ‘protest’ is just an excuse. If not this, then something else, such as in France where they claimed poverty made them riot. It don’t matter a whole hill of beans to them.

    However, it does to us. People get fed up of hearing this biased crap. I’ve heard plenty of people mention this and sometimes when I engage them in conversation (depending on the person & situation) they ask me “well why don’t you vote BNP, then?”. On explaining I’ve been a member for years their eyes light up and these days, I carry membership forms in my inside pocket at all times. Unless I’ve just got a T-shirt on that is.

    Posted by Mandala | February 22, 2008, 7:28 pm
  53. Totally agree “Defiant”, my son was in Iraq and Kosovo, he is out of the forces now, thank god, especially the way this country is supporting our forces, NOT!
    We are actually guarding huge areas of Afghanistan where opium popies are being grown, this is often shown on TV, why on earth arn’t these crops destroyed and replaced with something usefull? Am I being too cynical or is there some form of hidden government agenda to protect the drug traffic in order to further undermine our society? After all this is the government who, in a country with the worst binge drinking problem, brought in 24 hour drinking to alleviate the problem? Are the lunatics truly running the asylum or is it a case of multi million pound backhanders over and under the counter?

    Posted by EXCOLONIAL | February 22, 2008, 7:47 pm
  54. The Baghdad Broadcasting Corporation (paid for by Mr & Mrs Silly B’s the Great British Taxpayer) havce struck again.

    Am I surprised? Not at all. The cannabis loving trendy leftie arrogant overgrown opinionated sociology student types who have taken over the BBC despise the Armed Services as they as “reactionary and right wing”. Utter nonsense but that’s lefties for you.

    I always dig deep on poppy day or if I see any of Her Majesty’s forces collecting for anything. Well done boys and thank you for what you do for us. If that’s racist, reactionary or right wing.. tough I don’t care.

    Posted by Rick TB | February 22, 2008, 8:27 pm
  55. If every TV viewer in Britain refused to pay the licence fee, the point may be driven home that the BBC is no longer supported by the broad mass of the population and they couldn’t jail you all. Food for thought.

    Posted by Ex-pat loyalist | February 22, 2008, 11:25 pm
  56. Picture the Second World War with the Enigma machine old boy.

    “We have located a submarine and searched it what. There was a bally machine on board that looked like a typewriter. Sent the blighter to Bletchley Park where all the boffins hang out what. Turned out to be a code generator called Enigma. Better tell Jerry we are on to them so they don’t send any more bally troops into danger.”

    It is unthinkable isn’t it? That’s exactly, for my money, what is going on now. It is Treason. Just like with the Piers Morgan pictures etc…. Who exactly is intended to benefit by such things?

    Posted by Spannerman8 | February 22, 2008, 11:38 pm
  57. It’s not just the BBC either. I’m sure I caught a snippet of this dopey, pointless, Medhi Army/claims r us story on the nearly unwatchable C4 7pm News - before I put my foot through the TV screen. Our troops have never been so abused, both on and off the field of battle.

    Sky News is equally unwatchable. Whenever I’ve channel hopped through it today, it has been banging on about this serial killer loony tune like it’s a slow news day and nothing else is happening in the world - like Kosovo. You have to hop to Russia Today (516) to hear about the latest happenings there.

    Anybody out there got a few billion to spare so we can start our own BNP 7/24 News Channel? I’m getting really fed up with all this pointless news, spin and criminal lies at our expense and more and most important, at the expense of our precious soldiers’ lives.

    Posted by Winston | February 22, 2008, 11:55 pm
  58. “We are actually guarding huge areas of Afghanistan where opium popies are being grown, this is often shown on TV”

    I’ve always wondered why the US doesn’t put some of those B52’s to good use and just napalm the fields

    Posted by Defiant | February 23, 2008, 12:25 pm
  59. And if one dares to accuse the BBC of bias, one would be struck down as a ‘racist’.

    Posted by Saint George | February 23, 2008, 7:37 pm
  60. I have objected to paying the BBC TV licence fee tax, since I got my first house, the majority of BBC programming seems inferior and pointlesss competition for non-state TV, so I make them pay, by paying by credit card.
    I tend to watch far more non-state TV, like Channel 4, at least they have the guts to show non-PC, controversial and genuinely informative material, like “The Great Global Warming Swindle” and Dispatchs.

    Posted by LividTech | February 24, 2008, 5:34 pm
  61. I guess you are not allowed to kill terrorists this days. Just wait for them to kill you first, than you will be a good democrat.

    Posted by SerbChristian | March 7, 2008, 12:26 am
  62. Many people are not legally obliged to pay the BBC license fee. Under European Human Rights legislation, everyone has the right to life, and all Acts of Parliament are subject to this provision. Thus, if a law requiring you to pay a sum of money means that you will die of starvation or hypothermia if you do so, then that law cannot be enforced against you. Pensioners and other hard-up people should use their statutory right-to-life to go on license fee strike, spending the money they save on food and gas central heating instead, if this is the only way they can stay alive. They will be acting within the law, as will those who decide to keep breathing rather than pay their council tax. I defy any overpaid judge or minister to claim that pensioners and other poor people cannot exercise their right to life in this way–that they have to cough up, freeze, and starve to death instead. Yobs and other scum are always shouting “I know my rights!” It is high time that decent Brits stopped being so timid and claimed their rights, too. Community solidarity with the frail and elderly against the often-brutish license fee inspectors would help this “Life First” campaign succeed.

    Posted by ian_of_sussex | March 21, 2008, 12:50 am
  63. If anyone is going to make our brave lads fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan look bad, then step forward the BBC.

    I don’t believe they have done anything wrong. It is most likely a case of the ‘Muslim Council Of Britain’ spitting their poison in some top execs ear about racism and the BBC decide to shoot their mouths off about our soldiers. Its a total disgrace. The way they are treated by this government is shameful - from their housing conditions to lack of equipment to fight.

    How about sending all of the Labour, Lib Dems and Tory’s to Iraq and just for good measure chuck in the ‘Muslim Council Of Britain’ and the BEEB.

    Posted by EnglandxChick | May 9, 2008, 10:04 pm
  64. Strong words from atropos but so so true. I’ve served in Basra in 2006 for 7 months and truly don’t belive that high ranks in the British army would let things like torture happen. The thing that bothers me the most is how the BBC don’t let people know what really happens in places like Iraq and Afghanistan. They never mention how Iraqi interpreters, cleaners, cooks etc. who work for the British in bases have to live in fear of being kidnapped, coming and going from an innocent day’s work. While I was there they were loads of occasions when these people wouldn’t turn up and later you would find out that they were dead. Tortured first, then shot. These people who do these things like to let news reporters report things that Brit soldiers do, or so-called things we do, but never mention the brutal killings that happen on a daily basis and the things they do to scare Iraqi people into hating British forces.

    -
    Many thanks for your personal insight-Ed

    Posted by 4nth5559 | May 28, 2008, 9:35 am

Post a comment

Please note. You can copy and paste the Youtube code directly into your post - No need for linking!

You must be logged in to post a comment.

LOGIN / REGISTER

Subscribe to over 30 BNP News Feeds!

Nick Griffin Painting
Hand Painted on box canvass using Acrylics. Measurements; Height 35" ... - more...
Ending: 08th Aug 2008
Current Bid: £100,002.00
Bid Now
Powered by WP Auctions

    * This site is best viewed in Internet Explorer version 6 or above. Optimum resolution is 1024 x 768 or above.