On this burning issue of immigration, the news it now generates has become so extensive and bizarre that it is difficult for a monthly journal to keep up with it. It is, of course, because the BNP has awoken the nation to this ‘elephant in the drawing room’ and consequently stealing Lib-Lab-Con votes, that discussion of the subject has been allowed to come into the open.
Labour announces with pride that 23,000 failed asylum seekers have been given £4000 each and flown back to their countries of origin. Failed asylum seekers are mostly illegal immigrants. As they have broken our laws the BNP view is that they should be deported to either their homelands, or where not known, to the last of up to ten or more countries they passed through before getting into Britain. The BNP would offer at least £4,000 as a settlement sum for legal migrants in this country, or their descendants, who wished to return to their native lands.
The Home Secretary, Jacqui Smith, admitted in Parliament that as many as 11,000 foreign nationals could be working illegally in the security industry. There was one, a Nigerian, who was a security guard in her own Home Office.
The following day it was revealed that only 52,000 asylum cases out of a backlog of about 450,000 have been processed by the Home Office since last year – and processing does not mean that more than a handful have been deported. The Daily Mail calculated that it would take 113 years to clear the backlog at the present rate.
Next up came a proposal by Labour’s immigration minister that British families with foreign relatives outside of the EU could have to fork up £1,000 bond for each relative who wanted to come and visit them. It won’t become law because it will be opposed by many Labour and Lib-Dem MPs who are dependent on Indian and Pakistani votes, and if it did its affect on the rate of immigration would be minimal.
It is our young people who are now one of the main sufferers of the effects of mass immigration (see also our comment below). More than 100,000 young Britons may have been pushed into unemployment by the recent waves of economic immigrants from Eastern Europe, according to a new report by leading economic thinktank, Ernst & Young ITEM Club. Over 1.5 million foreign workers have entered the British workplace, with many of these arriving in the past three years and taking jobs “at cut-price rates”. During those three years the number of unemployed British 18 to 24 year-olds has increased by 100,000.
The report says: “There is some evidence that the growth of immigrant employment seen in the last few years may have come at the expense of the domestic workforce.”
This extract is from John Bean’s Nationalist Notebook in the January issue of Identity. To subscribe to Identity, the magazine of the British National Party, go to ‘Resources’ then click on ‘Identity Magazine’.
Share this page:
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Online Auctions
| The British National Party Website: Leading the way in British Politics. | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
1st: The British National Party
|
2nd: The Conservatives |
3rd: Labour |
4th: The Liberal Democrats |
5th: UKIP |
| Rank is the popularity of the site from 1st to last. Links in are how many other websites link to us. | ||||
©
2008,
The British National Party News , PO Box 287, Waltham Cross, Herts, EN8 8ZU. Telephone: 0871 050 0232
We have no idea of the number of people that have a legal right to be here. From a ‘ security ‘ point of view it must be a nightmare for those payed to protect us.
Also when these people disapear into the shadows they have little choice but to work in the black market, turn to crime or prostitution.
Better to fly them back to where they came from ( if they will tell us their country ) and put £ 4000 into an account for their troubles.
Until this can be arranged we should accommodate them on an island away from our mainland so they are not loitering in our towns day and night.
Why pay them to go home? we should just stick them on a plane and bill their government for the work and the fair. It shouldn’t be cheap either. This party is made up of people who do not run away from the problems their own country faces. Refugees should look to their own problems and evaluate them and get up off their bums and endeavour to put their own problems right.We don’t run away to another country and throw ourselves on their charity if it goes a bit wrong this end! We just deal with it! These people need to stand up and be counted in their own country to right the wrongs that they feel they have suffered. Running away solves nothing. Stand your ground and change your own country and stop asking us to give our lives to do it for you. Have they no pride, self-esteem or sense of duty? They have to do it themselves…we refuse to do it for them.
So our intrepid criminals (illegals are criminals) slope off home, clutching a squillion years worth of homeland wages and of course we can guess what happens next readers, can’t we? Yes all the family, friends and neighbours want a piece of the action! “What, if you get there and don’t get caught they give you free money, house and car, and if you do get caught they send you home free of charge with a king’s ransome in your back pocket??? Where’s my suitcase, I’m off to dear old Blighty!”
There is a disused American air field at Huntingdon very near the A1 road, easy to get to from anywhere in the country.Why not hire the services of one of the cheap airlines and shift the illegals out day and night.UNLESS this moral and intelligence bankrupt government very soon does something meaningful to empty this country of these people I fear that the British people will.By the way just because this government has sold our soverienty to Europe without OUR permission dont think that the people of this land will accept it.
The list of problems we have removing illegal immigrants out of the country is massive it starts.
1. Once they have been refused asylum they have the right of appeal.(if they lose this the judgement from the court is posted to them a few weeks later asking them to turn up at the airport) these people would rather go underground than go back.
2. We cannot forceable remove anyone. No British pilot would take a person on a flight who does not want to be on it.
3.Illegal immigrants burn, or lose there documents on purpose so we dont have a country to remove them too.
4. Other European countries will not except any immigrant that we find out as travelled through there country illegally to ours.
The list goes on and on and on, we have companies working out of the airport helping these people say the right things to immigration so they can get a foot hold in, we pay upto £800 per hour for Barristers to defend these people in court when they have no legal right to be here. I could rant on for hours about this subject.
FOUR GRAND IS A HELL OF A LOT OF MONEY TO SOME OF THESE FREELOADERS FROM THE THIRDWORLD.I AGREE WITH JIM GREEN THERE ARE DOZENS OF DISUSED AIRFIELDS AROUND THE COUNTRY.SO ITS TIME THE ARMY TOOK CHARGE TO ROUND THESE INVADERS UP AND GET THEM ON THE FIRST PLANE OUT OF HERE.
It’s a pity that this isn’t made law throughout the EU. There are quite a few member countries where I wouldn’t mind spending vacations while I made untenable asylum claims, all the time licking my chops at the equivalent in euros of £4000 (not an amount to be sniffed at even in the UK!)each time I’m removed from a generous provider’s country.
Until that situation materialises I’m wondering what safeguards there are in place to prevent the lucky winners of Asylumlotto UK(guaranteed prizes at each attempt) from entering the competition at a later date and walking off with yet another prize.
It’s impossible to add much to the above comments on such spot on/on the button articles as these, except: With this information now clearly out in the public domain thanks to the BNP, why on earth would anyone with an ounce of sense continue to vote for the lib/lab/cons? Vested interests (trade unions and muslims for labour etc) explain it partly but the population at large surely to God, cannot want to see their country go down the muslim pan - can they? Is the most we can ever hope from some traditional voters, that they abstain? Is that as good as it’s going to ever get with such voters?
If there is no BNP Candidate to vote for where I live, I will simply not vote or spoil my ballot paper - except I do not think of writing BNP all over the damn thing as spoiling it - more of a cleaning up exercise. I could not even vote tactically to even remove a labour tw*t if it meant putting my cross for either of the other two tw*ts.
It is of course, a lot more complicated than that. If for instance, very clever tactical voting on our part (and those who clearly support us) manage to unseat enough of them to end up with a hung parliament, a few BNP Parliamentary Seats can have an enormous amount of influence and power in a divided Coalition Government - even if they try and freeze us out of that coalition.
If there is no BNP candidate to vote for, maybe a well thought out BNP campaign in these seats will have the next best effect. We, the Members and Supporters, will need to get some good advice on this, in each of the seats where a BNP candidate is not available.
The BNP national vote is immensely important and (will) probably overrides all other considerations. But where there is no BNP candidate and if there is a particular lib/lab/con MP, who is of particular abhorrence to us, is a tactical vote to unseat them justified in such circumstances?
Does the bitter sweet end in this case justify the awful and unthinkable means?
I got me a great new ‘job’. I goes over to Inglund, I pleads asylum and I lost me papers. They gives me fowsands of pounds I puts it in my pocket and the stupid Inglish they pays my fare home. I spends the munny and then I comes straignt back, I pleads asylum and I lost me papers. They gives me fowsands of pounds I puts it in my pocket and the stupid Inglish they pays my fare home. I spends the munny and then I comes straignt back, I pleads asylum and I lost me papers. They gives me fowsands of pounds I puts it in my pocket and the stupid Inglish they pays my fare home. I spends the munny and then…
…and then one day they puts me and my seventeen thousand friends and relatives on this big plane wiv all our munny stupid Inglish give us, we get back home and my people they say ‘Go away’. So we go back to Inglund we claim asylum here’s our papers give us house more munny and I wanna proper passport I lost the one I bought from nice criminal and I want this things now or nice hyena you pay for give me human rights I am British citizen.
Welcome to Britainistan.
Winston, there’s absolutely nothing wrong with tactical voting, it’s part of the democratic process. In the absence of a BNP candidate, and ONLY in such an absence, I would suggest taking the albeit flawed option, and voting Tory. Tories may be a sorry bunch of fantasists who are too scared to say what they think, but at least I think it’s fair to say they won’t actively persue the politics of national suicide as do our Labour friends and as would the La-la LibDhimmis.
This party will owe its success to grassroots support from ordinary people, which is being built up at local level. I believe voting should be compulsory - you can spoil your ballot paper if you like, but people have to take at least a minimal part in democracy, or they, we, will lose it altogether. I could describe voting Tory as spoiling my ballot paper, but a vote against something is better than no vote for something, if you see what I mean. The mainstream parties, of course, love or hate tactical voting depending on the circumstances. No surprise there. Waiting for any display of integrity or principle from this shower, is like watching paint dry. I’m off to listen to the Shipping Forecast.
Lots of these immigrants from islamic lands are single young men, it amounts to an invading army. Who is to say that it isn’t. They have got into many important jobs, some sensitive, all moving into place, perhaps ready for the signal to go. As one columnist put it,’islam is tactically playing the longest game in history’.
Call me a conspiracy theorist,but I see a plan forming….While,for the past few years our forces have been fighting pointless wars in other countries,our homeland has been quietly invaded.By the time the wars are over our armed forces will be so weak and depleted that we will have next to no military defense against an enemy who will occupy the majority of our country.Food for thought……
apendragon - I know what you are saying about tactical voting but I could never vote for the cons unless it had a clear motive - to de-rail the lib/lab/con cabal-train and was recommended at the highest level. There was not a BNP candidate where I use to live (20,000+ lab maj) and I don’t think there will be one here - roll on PR, first past the post really sucks.
If I do not have a BNP candidate to vote for, I want my vote to help the Party as much as possible and inflict the maximum damage on the cosy lib/lab/con alliance.
If I do not have a BNP candidate to vote for, then spoiling my ballot paper will be the same as not voting at all - except it will make me feel better but it will not go to any national count. What a useless system we have here!
If you just want to try and unseat or keep a candidate out, then tactical voting is easy (just watch them try and do it to us) but if you detest them all, for what they’ve done and for what they stand for, it’s not so simple.
I need some help and advice with this one - and many others too? The cosy cabal are never getting my vote, unless it’s in the BNP’s and Country’s best interests! I’ve never had the chance to vote BNP and that probably speaks volumes for the sort of cosy-three-main-party-cabal Country we live in.
As the years roll by, maybe my dream is just to be able to put my cross for a BNP candidate. We really should be able to transfer our vote where there is no candidate we want to vote for - but that would spell danger for the LLC alliance.
time for change wrote “Lots of these immigrants from islamic lands are single young men, it amounts to an invading army.”
I agree totally. Don’t these idiots in charge realise you don’t need to send an army in the traditional military manner, ready to fight, you just send them disguised as asylum seekers then when there is a critical mass of them here. send a coded signal and they will don uniforms /whatever and rise up. I’m not saying all asylum seekers are “sleeper” agents but common sense would tell you there must be a proportion who are.
If people are genuinely fleeing persecution, why not stop at the first “safe” country you land in - the answers’ obvious - state benefits are higher here and we are stupid enough to tolerate all the terrorists / whingers / social trash and the MPs in Parliament are too busy trousering more taxpayers cash to take any notice of anything the public wants anymore.
I think it is essential that we remember and publicise at every available opportunity, that at the last general election in 2005, the turn-out was only 55% of the electorate. The Labour Party achieved approx. 40% vote of the actual turn-out.
What this means in reality, is that this “Government” is governing, or should I say controlling us all, with a mandate of only 22% of the electorate (40% of 55% turn-out).
What this further means, is that 78% of the Electorate did not vote for Labour. This means that 78% of the electorate could not ‘Bring themselves to vote Labour’.
As I have said in other comments, every one of these people is a Potential BNP Voter, if only they could be made to realise how many others have similar feelings to themselves.
How often do you see it mentioned anywhere in any areas of the media, the Low Mandate this “Government” have?
I know I’m getting away from the main point of this article again here but whiskyindia got me realising how astonishingly few people out there actually voted for this labour lot - only 22% of those eligible to vote!? This is not a democracy we live in but an elected dictatorship.
Why we think we have the right to try and impose some version of it on these muslim lands is quite beyond me - we should impose it on ourselves here in the form of PR.
For years, decades even, I have not been able to vote for anyone I believed in and that can’t be good or right for the Country.
The constituancy where I use to live, had a massive labour maj of 20,000+ thanks largely to the growing ethnic vote; which is why I am now here and no longer there - my bit of white fright and flight.
Mind you, a larger Catholic/Christian family did buy the house - two out (us) four in (them) to more than redress the balance, a tiny bit anyway! It may be of interest to some, that I held my nerve and rejected an asian offer, to subsequently get an extra £11,000 offer a few weeks later - perhaps there is a God after all! Anyway, this labour constituency hog was immovable and my vote counted for nothing.
Having such minority governments is not good for democracy or the Country - the results of which are only too obvious. Perhaps we have a duty to rise up and refuse to be mis-governed under such a discredited, corrupt system, especially when the very existance of its indiginous people and their Country are at stake!?
Just submitted last before seeing breaking news - Hain is resigning this afternoon. Yabadabadoooooooooooo! This is not the end, nor is it the beginning of the end etc. But good riddance. It’s a good start.
So the government has just given away £86 million to failed asylum seekers, not to mention the cost of the flights.I won’t go through the boredom, on better causes, this money could have been spent on,but it could certainly have been spent on ways to stop illegals coming in.Talkng about giving tax payers money away,Gordon Brown has recently given India £800 million to help educate their kid’s.The richest family in Britain is an Indian family,with assets of £14,000million.Why can’t they pay for Indian kids.
The true ammount of money given to these people is almost certainly far higher. All of these people are on benefits and when called to court are given legal aid at our expense. In a recent case held at the immigration tribunal at Snaresbrook, one of the numerous locations of these sites, there were 7 tribunal sessions each dealing with up to 6 or 7 cases each working day, there was a judge and home office official in each session, each “defendant” was legally represented by a solicitor and a barrister, in most cases they have an interpreter, with the crown having another! A total of at least 7 legal and associated people per person, all paid for by OUR tax money and we all know the exorbitant fees our legal profession get! Mind you its no surprise that this and the ludicrous “human rights legislation” has so many followers (or should I say leeches), a huge percentage of our “wonderful” LibLabCon government are lawyers, cashing in on the rich gravy train of ludicrous laws that give more rights to criminals than to the victims. The most blatant example is probably the recent, unlamented PM’s wife, Ms. C Blair, who bleats on behalf of islamic terrorists preventing many being deported to their own countries where many are wanted for murder!
30 million people pass through Heathrow airport every year. Total capacity for the whole country must be over 50 million a year. So obviously the excuse that there’s not the capacity to deal with illegal/unwanted immigrants is utter nonsense.