News Archive

Is the BNP Racist?


ethnic-orgs.jpg The enemies of British Nationalism continue to parrot the claim that the BNP is a “racist party.” This claim is most often repeated because the BNP unashamedly addresses itself to the issues and concerns of the indigenous British population, and because it seeks to ensure that British people remain the majority population in this country.  Opponents point to the fact that the BNP has an all-white membership, and that we address issues concerning white people.

If the BNP is racist for holding this position, then, we would suggest, all of the following organisations - some of them state funded - are also “racist” because they too address themselves exclusively to the issues and concerns of their respective communities:

1. Watford Asian Community care

2. Watford African Caribbean Association

3. National Black Police Association

4. Metropolitan Black Police Association

5. Black Londoners Forum

6. Black Information Link (BLINK)

7. Operation Black Vote

8. Federation of Black Housing Organisations (FBHO)

9. Black Training Enterprise Group

10. Southwark Black Heritage Organisation

11. The Action Group for Irish Youth

12. Asians In Media (AIM)

13. Barfi Culture (Asians)

14. Black Britain

15. Black Enterprise

16. Black net Community

17. The Black Presence In Britain

18. Black Search

19. Black UK Online

20. Board Of Deputies of British Jews

21. Chinatown Online

22. Clickwalla (Asian)

23. Dimsum (Chinese)

24. Doncaster Chinese

25. CEMVO

26. Every Generation (Black)

27. Jewish.Co.UK

28. Jewish Telegraph

29. MMLondon (Asian)

30. Red Hot Curry (Asian)

31. National Association of Nigerian Communities - UK (NANC)

32. Barnsley Black and Ethic Minority Initiative

Have you noticed how the media NEVER calls any of these organisations “racist” even though they are openly organised along ethnic lines and stand for the rights of their respective communities?

It seems as if every group has the right to have an organisation speaking up for its rights - EXCEPT the indigenous British people.

In reality, none of these organisations are “racist” — each and every community has the inalienable right to look after its own interests.

This includes the indigenous British folk, and the BNP is proud to be the party which stands up for the rights our folk and country, in exactly the same way that all of the above organisations stand up for their folk.

Share this page:

Add to del.icio.us Add to Diggit Add to Yahoo Add to Google Add to StumbleUpon Add to Facebook Add to MySpace
What do these buttons do?

Discussion

169 comments for “Is the BNP Racist?”

  1. Yet if you highlight the inequalities these organisations throw up, you are then labelled as a racist or trouble maker. Nice to see that the BNP supports organisations doing the same sort of work for Native Britons. I’ve always wondered how big an uproar there’d be if the following were started or publicised:

    White entertainment television (BET – Black Entertainment television, US TV channel)
    Music of White origin awards (Music of Black Origin Awards – MOBO’s)
    Miss White America / England (Miss Black America)

    Posted by Andrdew W-G | December 23, 2007, 1:14 pm
  2. Racism. Protecting one’s own race. if for this I’m labelled a RACIST so be it! BLINK threw claims of racist at the English Rose site. It’s just their attempt to prevent any kind of dialogue within the white communities. The Brugges group reported that it’s BLINK we have to thank for all the infectious diseases coming into OUR country. When in the Commons, the discussion was to examine every immigrant for various infections. Blink came out with the usual marxist label of RACIST.
    What a bunch of gutless MPs we have. They are too scared to put the interests of this nation and her peoples first. We now see the results in huge rises in TB, HIV, AIDS and every other kind of infection, not to mention the cost of treatment and neglect of our own folk. Fact. Pre-Labour we had approx 700 cases of AIDS. The latest figures are now standing at 73,000. Thank you Labour. Things can only get better you sang. But for whom?

    Posted by Yorkielass | December 23, 2007, 3:25 pm
  3. An extremely important issue here, but again, one which will be removed after 24 hours and forgotten about. This issue should remain on the BNP site for months to come to make people aware of the realities of living in the multi-racial nightmare of Britain today.

    Web editor’s note: No posts on this site are “removed” after 24 hours. They are all filed under “News archive” which you can find on the menu at the top of this page, or by using the search facility.

    Posted by igr40 | December 23, 2007, 3:46 pm
  4. The BNP is not racist, but for some reason the media portray them as racist. We identify ourself with our Anglo-Saxon group and want to keep it; just like other ethnic groups want theirs keeping, but this obsession by the press to call us racists is bewildering. I would never even consider joining or giving support to such groups who are racists. The idea that one group is superior to another is simply not true. All we want is to keep our identity.

    Posted by davidcopperfield | December 23, 2007, 4:14 pm
  5. From it’s earliest prehistoric times, the world’s human population has comprised a number of distinctly different races, all of them subdivided into several nations, each with its own identity, language and cultural traditions. That is true diversity. There is nothing to prevent any such nation trading with any other, on an equitable, mutually advantageous basis. That is true fair trade. The communist one-worlders rant on endlessly about “diversity” and “fair trade”, while doing everything possible to replace true diversity with a homogenized mass of stateless, disoriented and subjugated people and to reject true fair trade in favour of an exploitative system which allows the globalist elites to amass vast fortunes at the expense of the poorest, lowest-paid people on the planet. Those of us who oppose the imposition of this nightmare New World Order are denounced as “racists”.

    Posted by Noel | December 23, 2007, 6:29 pm
  6. Oh yeah. Blink.

    That’s the people who’ve come up with this gem.

    http://www.blink.org.uk/bm/

    “The Black Manefesto”

    I wouldn’t mind so much but it’s more about getting rid of what rights that we have left, rather than anything remotely to do with equality for all. They would love to see the BNP and it’s membership proscribed in all walks of life, not only because they believe that we are racist but because our objectives and aims are counter to the Human Rights Act–you know, all of that legislation that gets failed asylum seekers put on planes back to the UK because they have “a right to a family life”. There you have it. These people want others proscribed and hounded based on what they *think* and any such attempt to defend ourselves against such crap, is racist.

    It is racist for us to organise but it’s not racist for them to run around and deny us what they already have. They want all BNP members to be sacked from the civil service, while they not only have jobs in the civil service, but their movements are funded by the government, while we have to fund ourselves. If they got their own way, next it would be no jobs for BNP members in the private sector. They are racist to the bone because they want to deny whites the right to organise. They are the ones who have a message of hate and they are the ones who smile at the prospect of violence against us. These left-wing fascists who are exploiting and creating racist and divisive policies to attract the immigrant vote that they wouldn’t get off the natives are the real racists. They are the ones who brought race to politics, not us. They are the ones who are obsessed by race, not us. We just want an equilibrium where everyone is treated the same.

    Where is the equivalent whites-only organisation for social housing?

    http://www.ujimagroup.org.uk/index.html

    Don’t white people need housing? Apparently, according to our sell-outs, there is only one thing we all need to do and that’s die.

    So let’s stop voting for people who have, time and time again, let us down. Now they only promise to “think about” immigration. Now they only promise to “give it serious consideration”.

    That’s because we are weak. That’s because we are not represented. Vote for a party that represents white people and suddenly white people will be treated as equals with everyone else, and don’t let some po-faced angry liberal university graduate tell you otherwise.

    The hypocrisy of Blink does not know any bounds.

    Remember how they went nuts over the so-called racist cartoon in The Sun–you know the cannibal cartoon with Mark Thatcher about to be cooked and eaten by an African leader with a reputation for cannibalism? Where they said that all the features of the Africans were deliberately exaggerated? Well of course the features were exaggerated–it’s a cartoon! For further evidence of this, check out the cartoons done by “Felix” over on the BLINK website. The cartoons have very stereotyped and exaggerated features on all the white people, but you don’t hear us playing the race card in response.

    Blink are nothing more than a bunch of racist hypocrites who hate white people organising and while they should be allowed to organise (despite being so blatently racist), it’s about time decent people cut the money from the 1990 trust who receive a large wad of money from the mayors office. That’s right, as a vote-bribing exercise Red Ken bungs the 1990 trust 100 K a year and in return the 1990 trust along with other so called “official” black communities, tell Ken how great he is for black London.

    Posted by hrhdtr | December 23, 2007, 9:34 pm
  7. The terms Racism/Racist are becoming threadbare now through hysterical overuse by the self interested (not so) minorities. If it is impossible to stand up and protect your heritage and not be called a racist then every day more and more people are going be accused as such. Mass immigration has made the term crass. Idle bigotry? - no relation. It’s necessity.

    Posted by UprightMan | December 24, 2007, 12:56 am
  8. At last it has been revealed–the many racist anti-white organisations in Britain today. Let us hope that this report stays on the main web site here PERMANENTLY and is not removed like other news reports on this site.
    -
    All news reports remain on the site. You can go back and look at them in “news archives”-Ed

    Posted by igr40 | December 24, 2007, 12:43 pm
  9. davidcopperfield: Don’t forget the Celts. It doesn’t give quite the right impression!

    Posted by apendragon | December 24, 2007, 1:18 pm
  10. The BNP should keep this question and answer on the front page of their web site. They should also put it on all correspondence/leaflets/ etc…like a mission statement. The image of the BNP being a racist group needs to be removed from the public arena.

    Posted by godballsoffire | December 24, 2007, 5:29 pm
  11. To be a member of the BNP is to be a realist, not a racist. I have yet to meet a member of the public who does not agree with me. I can be talking to an acquaintance about any subject other than politics and more times than not they will bring up the question of how this country is being swamped with immigrants. A few weeks ago I came across a friend of mine building a nice Victorian fence around his garden. “it’s to keep Muslims out” were his first words. This is how a lot of people, at “ground” level are thinking in this country to-day. Whizz.

    Posted by whizz | December 24, 2007, 7:53 pm
  12. Good to see this article on the main page here. Hope it stays here.This article and all the pro ethnic organisations answers our critics. I agree with the other comment posted here-These pro black organisations and the BNP message here should be on BNP correspondence/ election leaflets/ etc…

    Posted by dvg | December 26, 2007, 10:21 am
  13. How can the BNP be racist when this is going on? ->

    http://isupporttheresistance.blogspot.com/2007/12/operation-black-vote.html

    Please keep all these articles and all related information on the site so that the public can see for themselves WHY and BY WHOM they and BNP are labelled racist!

    Posted by Dylan | December 26, 2007, 8:11 pm
  14. I believe that the word racist is mis-spelled, being in fact, realist. The real racists are those who are in Government here and who have control of the country. They do not want to re-create the movements in Ireland, Wales and Scotland which have seen the national Parties take power from those two parties who long believe only they know best and never the people. Looking amongst those here and in Governments past, the numbers who are not British in any way is quite astounding.

    Posted by David Little | December 27, 2007, 12:02 pm
  15. Great article. It just so happens that I had come across “Operation Black Vote” only a couple of days ago. Here’s another one to add:

    Black Mental Heath
    http://www.blackmentalhealth.org.uk/

    Go to the National Black Police Association

    http://www.nbpa.co.uk/index.php?option=com_frontpage&Itemid=1

    and you will notice, on their web pages (added fairly recently amid criticisms that they are a racist organisation):

    The definition of “Black” does not refer to skin colour.
    The emphasis is on the common experience and determination of the people of African, African-Caribbean and Asian origin to oppose the effects of racism.

    I would say that we need a…

    National White Police Association
    and that…

    “The definition of “White” does not refer to skin colour.
    The emphasis is on the common experience and determination of the people of Caucasian origin to oppose the effects of reverse discrimination.”

    This whole nation has become uncomfortably obsessed with racial group identities. The collectivist mindset is at the heart of racism. Government as an institution is particularly ill-suited to combat bigotry. Bigotry at its essence is a problem of the heart, and we cannot change people’s hearts by passing more laws and regulations. The government itself divides us by race, class, religion, and gender. Through its taxes, restrictive regulations, corporate subsidies, racial set-asides, and welfare programs, government plays far too large a role in determining who succeeds and who fails. Government institutionalises group thinking. This can make each group suspicious that others are receiving more of the government loot. This leads to resentment and hostility among us. Racism is simply an ugly form of collectivism, the mindset that views humans strictly as members of groups. True racists believe that all individuals who share superficial physical characteristics are alike. By encouraging Britain to adopt a group mentality, the advocates of so-called “diversity” actually perpetuate racism. The true antidote to racism is a limited, constitutional government devoted to the protection of individual rights rather than group claims, rewarding individual achievement and competence - not skin color, gender, or ethnicity. In a truly free society, every citizen gains a sense of himself as an individual, rather than developing a group or victim mentality. This leads to a sense of individual responsibility and personal pride, making skin color irrelevant. Racism will endure until we stop thinking in terms of groups and begin thinking in terms of individual liberty.

    Posted by Shropshire Lass | December 27, 2007, 1:03 pm
  16. Every human being ever born is a ‘racist’ in the tribal sense. It’s a matter of genetically-determined instinct; different races will always gravitate towards themselves, as sure as eggs is eggs. There’s nothing untoward about that, any more than it’s ‘wrong’ or ‘racist’ that seagulls fly around in their own flocks. It doesn’t mean seagulls regard any non-seagulls as ‘inferior’, and it certainly doesn’t mean they read Marx and decide that, against natural logic and instinct, they will force themselves and every non-seagull, to be the ’same’. Because they’re not.

    Posted by apendragon | December 27, 2007, 5:21 pm
  17. Posted by Dylan | December 28, 2007, 4:25 am
  18. It’s typical double standards by the do-gooders. An example of the do-gooder stuff was Xmas 2006. A local junior school was nearly forced by a school governor to call the Xmas pantomime 3 little puppies instead of 3 little pigs, just so it didn’t offend Muslims. It’s about time that the British Nationals were considered in ‘not being offended’. Instead we have to pander to the beliefs of ethnic religions for fear of being classed as racist. What next, no pork sausages on the kids school dinner menu?

    Posted by F1Yorkie | December 28, 2007, 3:51 pm
  19. Remember, that because white people are the majority in this country, we are branded as racist by the lefties by default, *EVEN* when we follow the lefty agenda. It’s easy for them to do that, because generally it’s white people (Though the wrong white people) who are wielding most of the power.

    Lefty : “It’s racist to control immigration, because black & asian people benefit from economic migration the most.”

    Normal Person : “OK…I give in…I’m tired of being called racist…I’ll leave to you to it.”

    Lefty : “Now that we have let these poor people in (They are economic migrants remember), the stats show that they live in the worst housing and that they are poorer than the rest of us. That’s because as a society we are racist. That needs to change.” :-/

    * NEVER * Give an inch to the po-faced lefties. If you do, they will racialize politics more and more, making us all look more racist in the process.

    Posted by hrhdtr | December 28, 2007, 5:14 pm
  20. Brilliant article and some superb comments, none of it offensive, so if you are RED and are educated, then please realise this. We are not racist.

    Posted by Jawbone | December 28, 2007, 11:24 pm
  21. Racist is a much mis-over-used word and normally by those who have a sinister and hidden agenda. Everyone has a tolerance threshold or thresholds. I don’t like what muslims believe in, practice or preach. I don’t want them in our country and I certainly don’t want them as a neighbour. I am offended, outraged even, when I see a female (if it is a female) with only its eyes barely showing. I have to remove a hood or a crash helmet if I walk into a bank but he/she/it is forgiven. At the airport, I am intimately body searched after having my face compared to my passport photo, while wanted male terrorists dress up in a burkha and are waved through security. I could go on and on. How many labour MP’s live in down and out black or white areas? They call us racist when we don’t want to be the last white person in a street filling up with ethnic minorities but make sure that the same never hapens to them or theirs. When a white mother complains to the council that she wants a change of school for her son because he is the only white child in a class of 40 and is being picked on - she is labelled racist, even though the damn councillors make sure such a situation never befalls their child. Racism is everywhere if you want to call it such. How many of our mainstream party supporters, who call others racist, would have voted for Tony, if Cherie Blair (she hates being called that) had been black or covered from head to toe in black with just her eyes showing - I know, I would have preferred her like that as well - and so probably would Tony. But you get my drift? Is labour the true definition of racist for hating all us whities?

    Posted by Winston | December 29, 2007, 7:00 pm
  22. He who hesitates, is lost. Don’t flinch in the face of the institutionalised intimidation known as ‘political correctness’. The people with the real racist agenda, are those who want to take this land from us, because it’s the most beautiful and fertile place on the planet. The Vikings couldn’t do it, the Spanish couldn’t do it, neither Napoleon nor Bismark nor Hitler nor Galtieri. Keep bloggin’ away til your digits turn blue, Winston et al - the message is getting across, the sheep will awaken and remember who they really are, and begin to speak freely again as true British citizens. And spell ‘colour’ correctly. The Free World is watching. Happy New Year! :)

    Posted by apendragon | December 31, 2007, 12:49 pm
  23. By calling the BNP racists they think they will shut you up. well I’m glad to see a party with some backbone that wont shut up telling it as it is. Who else have we got in this country that will speak up for us. The thing that does worry me is that the message isn’t getting out to enough people and when it does it gets twisted by the papers or the government. I see there is even a channel on the telly advising all these immigrants how to claim money and how to stay in the country and anything else they need to know. Can the BNP not get its own TV channel so that you can go out there and tell the country what is really happening in Britain; all the attacks that are racists against the whites could go on your news. They are getting more frequent now by Asians.

    One day soon when you’re in power, I hope you remember all the things said and done to the legal BNP party, and all the people that have done this should stand charged with treason.

    Posted by ILOVEENGLAND | January 5, 2008, 9:28 pm
  24. These days you cannot say anything without being “politically incorrect”. I think that other religions sometimes get too carried away. Prime example:
    Blackboard seen as offensive. It makes me laugh! People only say the BNP are Racists as the BNP actually want to keep Britain British! People need to understand the term RACISM instead of keep using this as an excuse when people have an opinion on the immigration rates of their country!!

    Britain now needs a right-wing approach to politics… the left-wing are weak and will do nothing to defend Britain from turning into a mass depression! There’s only so long working men can pay to stay alive! I predict a mass depression in Britain in 2020

    GO BNP!!!!

    Katie, 16

    Posted by katie06715 | January 8, 2008, 6:10 pm
  25. Every indigenous British person I have ever spoke to agrees with all BNP policies (however, many do not realise it). That is why the media and government employ every dirty trick, deception, lie, manipulation, to prevent our message getting out.

    Take the farce which was created by the media, politicians, etc about Nick Griffin speaking at the Oxford Union, surely if those opposed to the BNP believe that their arguements would defeat ours then they would relish to debate with us in public. The fact they don’t want a debate is because they know once our message gets out (undistorted by the media) then we would win the next general election hands down. So instead they seek to silence us - to prevent our message getting out. We believe in democracy, those who employ gutter tactics obviously do not.

    The diseased media and the corrupt politicians who infest the House of Parliament have created an Orwellian thought crime - and it is called ‘racism’ - a double speak. What exactly racism is will never be defined by the ‘powers that be’ as it is their intention to keep it a vague term, applicable to their enemies and yet never applicable to their allies. Why can’t indigenouos Brits have Music of White Origin or a White Police Officers group? Because, they will say with their forked tongues, it is racist for you to seek such organisations, yet it is a championed cause for any other ethnic group.

    People will police their own thoughts with with the newspeak of this politically correct age. Those in power (and the media) have ceased to represent the majority indigenous British person, instead they serve pay-masters for other reasons and in other lands. This is an age of great betrayal and monstrous deception.

    The BNP are the only hope for this land and it’s people. Time for complacency is over, the time of wishless thinking has passed. The hideous intentions of those in power, the EU, the media and other dark forces force us to face reality square in the face and, as we have done before, we don our armour and gather our forces as we take the battle to them.

    The BNP will win and we will reclaim our land.

    Posted by magmell | January 9, 2008, 12:40 am
  26. The BNP is not racist. It merely tries to protect a race of people. That’s exactly what the government has forced down our throats for the past few decades with regard to other races. The BNP is simply doing the same. Good for it :) x

    Posted by MaidMarion1986 | January 11, 2008, 12:17 pm
  27. There is a large membership website called Blackplanet. I notice there is not a equivelent called Whiteplanet. Perhaps white people are lacking in their own understanding or is it because is too Non PC.

    Posted by rogshar | January 13, 2008, 1:51 pm
  28. Katie06715, you say that “Blackboard” is seen as offensive.

    But what about my rights? I’m offended by “whiteboards” (an unfortunate predicament, as I go to a college).

    If only the government would recognise my rights as a white person, I would get substantial compensation because I’ve been “deeply offended” by those evil, evil whiteboards.

    Yet again, the “government” have found another way to deposit the taxpayers money to the hands of minority of non-British people. By asking them to pretend that blackboards are offensive to them, and giving them the excuse to claim compensation.

    Posted by Daniel Owen | January 14, 2008, 5:24 pm
  29. As an American, who has read many articles written by the BNP, I have concluded that the BNP is not racist; but, a political party defending it’s constituents and their rights as British citizens. Logic dictates: If it is wrong to discriminate blacks, Asians, etc., is it not also wrong to discriminate individuals who support the BNP? There are plenty individuals who support the BNP but only a few of them support them by speaking out publicly and financially. If one believes he or she is being discriminated against, one should standup for one’s beliefs. If one fails to do what is right, one should not complain. I wonder how many individuals, who say they support the BNP, fail to speak up publicly or financially help but only complain? Not many!

    Posted by Hiram-Abif | January 16, 2008, 2:07 am
  30. Hiram-Abif: The ‘few’ are becoming the ‘many’, who as you point out, are the ones being discriminated against. Intellectually challenged (and politically motivated) conformists can and will continue to throw their standard insults at us; they choose to ignore their own capacity for rational thought, preferring to stay within the comfort zone of the politically correct. It’s something to do with peer pressure, feeling safe by towing the line. That particular ‘comfort zone’ is becoming less comfortable by the day. It’s time to confront these issues in an adult, logical and informed way. A change is as good as a rest!

    Posted by apendragon | January 16, 2008, 6:25 pm
  31. I’m appalled at what this country has become in the past 10 years under NuLabour–it is heading towards the gutter.

    Everybody I speak to has the problem of immigration at the top of their list of things they want to change about Britain, yet is handled with kid gloves by all parties apart from the BNP.

    When will we actually stand up to the PC brigade and stop being worried about being called racists? Well Britain the chance to actually say what you think behind closed doors is here!

    I would love to move to Australia but I would not get the required points scoring to get in.

    1. I have a house with over 120,000 GBP equity
    2. I am from a catholic background
    3. I have a family
    4. I have never been out of work
    5. I have saving plans and a pension
    6. I do not have a skilled trade to offer to their country

    6. I DO NOT QUALIFY TO GET IN!!!

    Do I think Australians are racists? NO, and to be honest they do not give a toss if I think I do! I only wish Britain would adopt their policies and maybe I wouldn’t want to leave our shores!

    When our country is equal to the rest of the world and we have nothing more to give, where will the 2nd generation of my family be able to migrate to for free housing, cars, social benefits, healthcare and a pension??

    thank god for the BNP - it gives me some hope for this once great nation.

    Posted by RJHSUSSEX | January 16, 2008, 11:13 pm
  32. Apendragon: I hope your optimism about change (the ‘few’ are becoming the ‘many’) is on the increase. If one keeps his head in a hole and fails to pay attention and react accordingly, one will find not only his head in a hole but his whole body. I am not trying to offend the British society, but the British society, just like the Americans, are the cause and effect of their own problems. They allow people whom they know nothing about, to enter the society by the thousands; and, when these people get together collectively, they force change to fit their agendas (which are not British or American). The British, who the BNP represent, are individualists and therefore do not gather collectively. The BNP is the collective party who represents you and others like you but the party can’t stand alone. It needs concerned citizens and the financial support. Without support, the party will fail.

    Posted by Hiram-Abif | January 17, 2008, 7:59 pm
  33. Hi I’m Dan and I am 18 years old.

    Is the BNP racist? Haha (no).

    The BNP are nationalist and care about the white British people, and wants to make Britain Great again by cutting down on crimes amongst other things, and the fact of the matter is that too many people are comparing the BNP to Nazis, which is wrong because the BNP aren’t running around trying to pull some stupid stunt called ethnic cleansing. This year I am old enough to vote and I will be voting for the BNP. If anything I have put in this comment is wrong please tell me!!!

    Many thanks. Good luck to the BNP!

    Posted by Dan | January 19, 2008, 2:01 am
  34. Add to the list of organisations:– Glasgow based ‘charity’, Positive Action in Housing. This ‘charity’ was created 13 years ago to supply housing for the ethnic minorities. The ‘charity’ is funded by the Scottish Government.

    Posted by MOVETHEMOUT | January 19, 2008, 9:37 pm
  35. In Nottingham they are building something called ‘the new art exchange’, a building comprising of art galleries/space, recording studios and facilities specifically for black and Asian people. Surely if I opened a similar building for white art I’d be called a racist? I applied for a summer school course at the old art exchange and I was rejected because of the colour of my skin. Buildings and services like these encourage segregation. Ethnic minorities bang on about wanting to be treated the same as everybody else, but they are the only people opening up centres and organizations specifically for people of their race. There is an other art centre due to open in Nottingham, for everybody, regardless or colour and creed, so why should there be another building that excludes a certain race, in this instance, white people? If it was the other way round it would be shut down before the plans had even been drawn up.

    Posted by tatie | January 22, 2008, 9:26 pm
  36. There was time within living memory when most people scarcely ever thought about race.

    They didn’t have to, because the country was racially almost totally homogeneous. If they ever did think about other races, it was to contrast the lot of the British with ‘less happier breeds’ abroad. (Shakespeare of course, was a ‘racist’)

    It is the greatest irony that nowadays we are forced at every turn to think about race, by the leftists who have imported millions of other races and forced them down our throats.

    When we were racially homogenous, there was no excuse for the whole panoply of political correctness. Now, with this dreadful ideology, we have become less free than at any time since the middle ages.

    ‘Racist’ and ‘racism’ are categories invented by the left as an aid to destroy our nationhood. The phrase ’stamp out racism’ gives the lefitst game away - it assumes the leftist proposition that we are not ‘racist’ by nature but by social conditioning.

    The reality, surely, is that we are ‘racist’ by nature and that this tendency is reinforced by society.

    Posted by lance | January 23, 2008, 1:50 pm
  37. Hiram-Abif: So where’s the cheque? :)

    Posted by apendragon | January 24, 2008, 2:06 pm
  38. Bukra: Without presuming to know what that website is, there is surely more than enough misinformation, disinformation, noninformation and downright lies about the BNP ‘out there’ to keep any naive, gullible bigot happy and ignorant (and I don’t mean that personally). The BNP can’t be expected to provide anti-BNP links of questionable propriety from its own site. There are plenty of government grants floating about for all that rubbish. Kind regards.

    Posted by apendragon | January 24, 2008, 2:25 pm
  39. “Racism”. Seems a pity, although I fully appreciate the need for it, that the BNP have to go on to the back foot when being accused of the only sin worse than murder. The only reason that such a non-concept has so much power is because those who use it are rarely made to explain how they are using it. On the rare occasions that this does happen the attempted explanation is completely pathetic and leaves the would-be witch slayer looking ridiculous. More seriously, self-serving and hate-filled anti-racist hypocrites are extorting a lot of money from a lot of good people with this nonsense. Of course, we all know all of this already. After all, this is a war you know!

    Posted by Tony Rogers | January 24, 2008, 7:00 pm
  40. Evil BNP racists: the onus to explain how ‘racism’ is being used is with the accuser - not the accused. You will fight your own straw man before an amused audience. Do not let them get away with this trick!

    Posted by Tony Rogers | January 24, 2008, 7:14 pm
  41. How easy is it, for organised leftists and assorted anti-British groups, to conduct a campaign of disinformation featuring ‘BNP supporters’ on this or that website? If the BNP resorted to that kind of tactic, it would be a betrayal of the values we fight for. I think our position is quite clearly shown in the article. THIS is the party website. Beware of imitations!

    Ed Says: Here, here! Well Said!

    Posted by apendragon | January 24, 2008, 9:18 pm
  42. That is an excellent list. And, you’re right, of course - none of those organisations are ever called ‘racist’. All the same, the actual question was: ‘Is the BNP racist?’ In order to answer this question it doesn’t help in the least to point the finger at Watford Asian Community Care, et al. It may provide a good diversion, but it doesn’t give the answer.

    In the end, whether they are racist or not is no-one’s concern except theirs. What is of interest to us, though, is whether THE BNP is racist - and it would help if this website, above all, was able to answer the question honestly. I think the answer must be yes.

    After all, what could more pathetic than a BNP councillor (I can think of one) going around saying: ‘I’m not racist, honest’ (please don’t hate me).

    I mean, if we’re racist, we’re racist. And I don’t mean this in an unfriendly way at all…

    Posted by jeffreymarshall | January 24, 2008, 11:51 pm
  43. Why cant we get away from this racist tripe and just accept that we all want our own country back to what it used to be. It sickens me to think that both my grandfathers were fighting in ww11 (1 lost his life!!) to save this country, only for the labour party to hand it over on a plate 60 yrs later. Its not about racism its about putting things right! British folk are treated as second class citizens in their own country. I have never voted BNP before, not even read any of their policies, but after 4 of my children have been mugged for their posessions ( 1 at knifepoint) I feel its time to make a stand, and the BNP seem to be the only party with the british peoples best interests at heart. I think if something doesnt give soon we will have a civil war on our doorstep….Thank you LABOUR party!!!!

    Posted by convertedlf | January 25, 2008, 4:08 am
  44. Definition from dictionary .com

    “Racist”

    1.a belief or doctrine that
    inherent differences among the various human races determine cultural or individual achievement, usually involving the idea that one’s own race is superior and has the right to rule others.

    2.a policy, system of government, etc., based upon or fostering such a doctrine; discrimination.

    3.hatred or intolerance of another race or other races.

    1)mentions inherent differences and cultural achievement-what is achievement and how is it measured?

    2)There is no doubt that present government is blatantly racist.

    3)As for hatred or intolerance-hatred no intolerance yes-why should we tolerate being forced to surrender our culture, heritage and identity so that the non indigenous can enforce their own upon us?

    In conclusion The BNP and it’s members and supporters can only be as racist as the non indigenous people,who come here expecting to change this country to suit their own needs or indeed our own government who seek to give advantage to non indigenous peoples in respect of employment,benefits and housing,etc.Racism works both ways

    Posted by onetruebrit | January 25, 2008, 11:49 am
  45. The next time someone insinuates that they know how I feel or what I believe, by way of the question ‘Are you a racist?’, my answer will be something like this:

    ‘I do not have to answer that question, but I choose to reply that I am no more a racist than you are, friend, and possibly less so than you are.’

    I could add: So stick that in your politically correct pipe and smoke it! Friend.

    Posted by apendragon | January 25, 2008, 12:40 pm
  46. Racism works one way. if only the rest of the nation would realise this.

    Posted by benham | January 25, 2008, 1:31 pm
  47. Tatie, as regards your post on the 22nd of January and on the BNP being ‘racist’ – The New Art Exchange you refer to was part funded by the New Deal for Communities Radford and Hyson Green which was awarded £55 million out of a £2 billion pound ODPM budget to regenerate the 39 worst deprived areas in the country. I was a democratically elected board director of this quango and I was bullied as I sat on the committee that approved 1.3 million of funds for this racist ‘target’ funded scheme when I strongly opposed it. I asked if the organisation was New Deal for Black and Asian people or New Deal for Communities? I was branded a racist extremist for defending the whites who elected me, which I did at every possible opportunity, as with the ‘target’ funded Ishango Science project which also excluded whites with no separate white after school club provided to facilitate the segregation agenda.

    Amongst other things, I questioned whether it was possible at this £55 million pound scheme for projects and subsequently ‘jobs’ (oh they love those!), to be created on paper that didn’t really exist, should people seek to ever siphon off community funds. It was confirmed by Louise Ross (HR) that there were no means to ensure that community projects were actually delivered as proposed hence the high staffing levels.

    Furthermore, as a student armed only with £17.50 in the bank, the scheme expelled me and a letter from Anthony Collins Solicitors (Birmingham) landed on my doorstep requesting £5K libel damages after I got frustrated with the shambles and took it up myself to send a rather injudicious email signed “yours sincerely disgusted with the crooks” to board members with a copy to our then M.P, Alan Simpson who was stolen from us via a dodgy boundary change. Anyway, My findings were covered up in the Nottingham Evening Post by a full page advertisement the day after journalist Sean Kenny interviewed me at my house.

    Among my persecutors was a £70,000 a year chief executive who is a P.E teacher with an MBA (master of BS arts). He found it perfectly acceptable to defend corruption at that price. Now that he has been stabbed in the back and is the centre of a fraud probe do you he might think twice about doing it again? Read here:

    http://www.thisisnottingham.co.uk/displayNode.jsp?nodeId=195917&command=displayContent&sourceNode=134241&contentPK=19304767&folderPk=78486&pNodeId=133951

    http://www.thisisnottingham.co.uk/displayNode.jsp?nodeId=133965&command=displayContent&sourceNode=133948&contentPK=19599482&moduleName=InternalSearch&formname=sidebarsearch

    Luckily for you Tatie, another ex-NDC democratically elected director in Leicester, made a complaint to the CRE after being racially insulted as a Scotsman at his branch of ‘Nice Deal for Commuters’ as we call it. They repeatedly told him “Why should we help you”? And mocked him. What they didn’t know was that they were secretly being filmed!!! Ha haha!!

    http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=tLcOiVH19oA&feature=related

    The Leicester Racial Equality Centre are so annoyed about being publically shamed via You Tube and my little bit of e-activism that they are taking my dissident friend to court:

    http://s259.photobucket.com/albums/hh297/cadurgedaily/

    And this is where you come in: Please send me any paperwork in relation to your discrimination at fleur@fleurwhite.co.uk so I can add it to my dissident friends bundle for his court case in a couple of weeks.

    If the BNP are racist then what about this evil ethnic Marxists and their PC £70k friend Sam Tarff who have persecuted me?

    Posted by Fleur White | January 26, 2008, 4:17 am
  48. Personally, racism makes me feel sick. I don’t understand it. It doesnt get us anywhere, it’s pointless. LIFE’S TO SHORT TO HATE. and I am also a proud owner of a BNP membership, because apart from a few bad apples, I believe the majority of the BNP are good British people, fed up with being betrayed and lied to. We just need to get the message across that if you’re interested in being racist, reform your views or don’t join us.

    Posted by young_modern_nationalist | January 26, 2008, 8:55 pm
  49. These black and asian organisations are not ‘racist’ because,according to leftist ideology (which is pure hokum) ‘race’ is a concept invented by the whites to keep other races in subjection. This begs the question as to how or why whites identified these others as races or even different in any way if they did not first exist as such in the the alleged thought processes of the whites. But never mind. Leftist thougnt is replete with such contradictions, although leftists seem to get along without noticing.

    Anyway, because racism is, according to leftists an invention of the whites to oppress blacks and asians, blacks and asians cannot therefore be ‘racist.’

    Of course, it’s all nonsense, and completely ignores human nature, which is one area where human beings are (more or less) equal. Blacks and Asians are every bit as ‘racist as anyone else. Asians are for example ‘racist’ about other ethnic groups in the Indian sub-continent, about blacks and about whites as well.

    Hence the oppression of the whites as second class citizens in their
    own country by their own government.

    To have one’s country destroyed and one’s people dispossed on the basis of this third rate thinking makes one weep.

    Posted by lance | January 27, 2008, 10:58 pm
  50. This is my example of equal treatment

    —– Original Message —–
    From: Maria Segwai
    To: ‘ray_scot@talktalk.net’
    Cc: Anthony Robinson
    Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2007 11:57 AM
    Subject: RE: Equality Human Rights Commission

    Dear Mr Scot
    Thank you for your recent correspondence.
    Unfortunately, it is not possible for the EHRC to assist you further in this matter. Your case file is closed. You are advised to seek assistance elsewhere.
    Thank you for drawing our attention to this case.
    Yours sincerely
    Maria Segwai.

    From: ray_scot@talktalk.net [mailto:ray_scot@talktalk.net]
    Sent: 18 December 2007 23:38
    To: Maria Segwai
    Cc: Denise Layne; Anthony Robinson
    Subject: Re: Equality Human Rights Commission

    Ms Segwai
    I am not happy to contact you but I am advice by CAB to contact you, I have further been advised by two other REC informing me that I should contact you. If the position remains the same treat this as a formal complaint.
    I wrote e-mails to many REC`s around the UK instead of naming the Braunstone community Association (BCA) = company (A) and The Race Equality Centre (TREC) = Company (B) as I wanted to get impartial advice and I did.
    This is full e-mail I sent to all three:
    Dear Sir/Madam
    I hope you don’t mind but I don’t want to give you details of the companies involved, I just need advice to see if I have been discriminated against.

    REC response number 1:
    Having read Ray’s email it would appear that he has a case to argue.
    If the discrimination is service related then Commission for Equality & human Rights will deal with it.
    Be happy to advice Ray if he needs further information.

    REC response number 2:
    Having looked at your correspondence and the facts provided it does appear that you have been put at a disadvantage and have been a victim of victimisation as understood under the Race Relations Act.

    REC response number 3:
    It does seem to be very strange that firstly you didn’t get the apology, though depending on what was said and the level of evidence an apology should have been the very least you received. Did you seek any advice at the time from any other bodies such as CAB?

    It also seems odd that they would put the offender on the panel and not agree to help you. Ultimately it is very difficult to give advice and guidance with out knowing the full details of the situation. But on the face of what you have told it it does seem you have suffered victimisation.

    It is up to you how you take this forward. You can report it to us as a racist incident and we can investigate it for you if you like?

    To make very clear I have three separate answers from REC`s in the UK who have come to the conclusion that the information I sent to them was enough for them to stated that I have been racial discriminated and victimised by company (B) which is The Race Equality Centre (TREC).
    The REC has made to clear that “If the discrimination is service related then Commission for Equality & human Rights will deal with it.” Yet considering you have had a large amount of information from me where YOU can say it is discrimination you have failed to do that.
    I have to think that Commission for Equality & human Rights do not take a case on when the racial victims are the indigenous population of the UK white English, Scots and Welsh.
    Or is it the case that the Commission for Equality & human Rights will not take action against The Racial Equality Centre (TREC) because the staff are non white and the chair of TREC Mr Surinder Sharma of The Race Equality Centre (TREC) has connections as follows:
    • Began his career with the Commission for Race Equality
    • Commissioner chairman Equal Opportunities Commission

    So I ask you again to confirm whether in your opinion “the Commission for Equality & human Rights” do you agree with the REC`s answers to my e-mail I received that I been a racially discrimination against and a victimised victim as understood under the Race Relations Act.

    I also ask that the Commission for Equality & human Rights” reconsiders their decision not to represent me at the Nottingham County Court. I again ask you to represent me at the Nottingham County Court in my claim of racial discrimination and victimisation due to the actions of The Race Equality Centre (TREC) who are based at Leicester.
    To make I am willing not to pass this e-mail onto Government and MP`s including the media providing that the Commission for Equality & human Rights give me proper advice and support that I am entitled to receive like any other ethnic minority.
    I believe I am entitled to expect the Commission for Equality & Human Rights to take my case up for me and to take action against The Race Equality Centre (TREC) at Leicester either through negotiations or civil court, I await your answer.

    Two Race Equality Councils support Mr Ross action of racial discrimination and victimisation against The Race Equality Centre (TREC) who is based in Leicester.

    On the 17 December 2007 AT 10.10 AM at the Nottingham County Court, Court room 5, The Race Equality Centre (TREC) was defending an action brought by Mr Ray Ross that TREC had racially discriminated and victimised Mr Ross.

    TREC`s acting chief executive Mr Chino Cabon asked his honour Judge Inglis to:
    1. Strike out Mr Ross`s action against The Race Equality Centre (TREC)
    2. Impose a gagging order on Mr Ross not to seek publicity or contact TREC`s funders
    On both accounts his Honour Judge Inglis did not grant TREC`s request.

    Mr Ross who was representing himself informed his Honour Judge Inglis that two other Race Equality Councils not in Leicester had stated that Mr Ross had a case to argue. Mr Ross told his honour he could not get legal representation in Leicester as there were conflicts of interest involved.

    His Honour Judge Inglis granted Mr Ross`s request and gave him a date for the 15 February 2008 to get Legal representation to present his case against The Race Equality Centre (TREC) who are based in Leicester.

    Ray Ross
    Tel: 0116 289 2961
    Mobile: 07809 338009
    —– Original Message —–
    From: ray_scot@talktalk.net
    To: Maria Segwai
    Cc: Anthony Robinson ; Denise Layne
    Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2007 2:15 PM
    Subject: Re: Equality Human Rights Commission

    Dear Ms Segwai

    I am very disappointed that you have chosen to answer my e-mail dated 4 December 2007, as I understand it you should at least tell me if there was a potential discrimination case against The Race Equality Centre (TREC) at Leicester this you have chosen not to do.
    I have previous correspondence from the CRE where they did not take my case for being racial discriminated in 2004 but the CRE at least confirmed to me that it was racial discrimination.
    I ask you to confirm that Equality Human Rights Commission does not give advice on whether a person has been racially discriminated against or not.
    I take this opportunity to formally ask you “Equality Human Rights Commission” to confirm that I have a case of racial discrimination against The Race Equality Centre Leicester; you are able to make that decision as I have sent you enough documentation.
    I do feel you are treating me like “The Race Equality Centre (TREC)” Leicester in that by your refusal to give me answers amounts to racial discrimination and if I waited for an answer from before I take action I would be out time like what has happen to me already.
    I further believe your refusal to answer me is because the chair Mr Surinder Sharma of The Race Equality Centre (TREC) has connections as follows:
    • Began his career with the Commission for Race Equality
    • Commissioner chairman Equal Opportunities Commission
    I believe this is why Equality Human Rights Commission will not give me answers or advice, I believe had I been of a more publicised ethnic minority “Scots” the Equality Human Rights Commission would have given me the support as a racially discriminated person should get.
    But obviously being a white Scot ethnic minority who lives in England we are ignored by organisations who received hundreds of thousands of tax payers money to promote racial equality and stop racial discrimination clearly in your eyes does not include the Scots so I supposed by the Equality Human Rights Commission attitude the English and Welsh will be treated the same?.

    Posted by Wallace | January 28, 2008, 2:35 am
  51. for kla1987 and others.

    many good points in your entry kla which i assume is your initials and year of birth in which case you are twenty years of age.

    Some points in reply if I may.

    Racist as a word was devised by a communist in Russia as it suited them to be able to verbally attack those who opposed their views into silence.That succeeded and still does.

    Blood is thicker than water and people invariably prefer the company of their own kind.Sheep stick to flocks etc.

    As far back as Thomas More there was civil strife and petitions from those residents where large numbers settled from Europe and were refugees come here.More said look at it from their point of view.

    At that time the population of England was less than one tenth of the figure today.

    Thomas More was at the same time locking protestants into the torture room he kept in the cellar of his house.These were English protestants as opposed to those of the catholic faith he followed.

    These many people from abroad come here with their skills are they invited by future employers or are they here on spec’.

    There are rather more without skills come for any work they can get.

    None of them have to jump through hoops as we would if wanting to live overseas unless we have a wad of cash to spend there.

    The fact is racism does not exist in anything like the form it is portrayed as being in existence but it enables nationalism to be cloaked as racism.

    Nationalism in germany first enabled germany to rise out of the despair it was in over a matter of five years.In the same period of time in Russia Stalin did nothing like as much good.All his people got was ever more and more of F*** all.

    We drive in Volkswagons on dual carriageways both of which were the ideals of those nationalists.

    I do understand the points made by kla.

    He or she should bear in mind please that for many of us who,like me have lived for 60 years,and witnessed the decline of what was once a great country with a work ethic now driven out of so many of our young people that many now accept anything they are told.

    Experience will show you but unless nationalism is given a chance in 40 years time kla you may only have a memory of what life was like before in the world of Eurograd.

    people come here because they were not examined in any way and they heard it was good.

    People here have long now been told they are lower achievers than Indians or Orientals or anybody else.Quite how someone can believe that the children of an illiterate pakistani can be better then his/her defeats me but we have the media to blame for ever pushing the happy face of multi culturalism hence 85% of news presenters are foreigners.

    Posted by David Little | January 28, 2008, 11:47 am
  52. The term ‘racist’ is used by the left wing exactly as the word ‘Jew’ was used by the Nazis - as an attempt to dehumanize their opponents in the eyes of society and thus remove their human rights as a prelude to oppression and indeed extermination.

    This is why we must identify exactly what they are doing and defy it with logic, passion, and even wit - by any means necessary!

    Pointing out blatant double standards as this article does is an excellent way to go about this.

    Posted by Karl Baxter | January 31, 2008, 2:48 pm
  53. This is a prime example of this countries blind ignorance to the sinking ship that is Britain today! Labour have allowed such people residency to our country and now that we are being over run, we are not allowed to speak out!! With labour in the driving seat it has become very blatant that the only way to get anywhere in this country is to be of none british origin! This has gone on to long!
    This is a prime example of double standards, that ethnic minorities are allowed to critisize us and abuse us in anyway they see fit, but if we retaliate, we are branded racists!! It is about time we stood up for ourselves!

    Posted by Charlotte | February 1, 2008, 10:32 am
  54. Just like many things handed to us in the last century, Racism is a representation of alien ideology. Racism is a made-up non-entity, a little like ”discrimination”. All things in nature discriminate -Lions mate with lions - elephants with elephants - bees with bees and on it goes. There is no difference in human nature. Jews marry Jews, Black Africans from certain tribes who emigrate here, only choose partners from that tribe, and catholics, Muslims and others, usually only keep with their own. Nature is being warped when it comes to white Britons and others in the west. ”Racism” was invented by Trotsky for destructive purposes, and it is working, but it is false, and not to discriminate is suicide. Intellectual arguments are what is needed to fight this alien silliness once and for all.

    Posted by BC1959 | February 3, 2008, 6:55 pm
  55. Karl Baxter is making sense here. They (the media and the lefties) label the BNP as racists out of fear of what the party could achieve-the other parties simply dont want to accept this and so simply typecast an entire party. Its ridiculous but at the same time has been and will always be a main method in politics and society.

    Vote BNP.

    Posted by Jake | February 8, 2008, 10:28 pm
  56. The left uses ‘racism’ to shut down legitimate debate. It’s a tried and tested tactic.

    I don’t care, I want Britain to be for its indigenous inhabitants, for people who understand their obligations to one another as part of society, and not a country just for freeloaders fresh off the banana boat or Pakistan here to milk it for everything they can get.

    Posted by Proud tobeBritish | February 8, 2008, 11:00 pm
  57. Even if it’s true what those loones on the left insist on — even if the BNP is racist — so what?? It’s nothing more than a temporary, designer term, a title given to those who do the right thing. Carry it like a badge of honor! It’s a small price to pay for the great reward of the success of our cause! Be strong, and the right thinking will be avenged.

    Posted by Weythran | February 10, 2008, 6:09 am
  58. Hear hear.
    Very good points there. I always thought about this myself.
    The same thing applies to other areas of social and community life as well.
    Furthermore all other European countries experience the same hypocrisy.
    It is the same people who aplaud those organisations and attend to their meatings with friendly handshakes and speeches who would be first to call a ” White Student Union” a racist organisation without hesitance.

    Marcelo

    Posted by ItalianBNPSupporter | February 11, 2008, 1:50 am
  59. 1) Who exactly are the “indigenous British population”? Black and Asian people have been living here for hundreds and hundreds of years - Does the BNP support the “issues and concerns” of these British indigenous communities?
    how far back do you have to go to be “indigenous”? as far back as the Romans (Italians), Vikings (Danes), the Normans? (french/norse).

    2) I am a British/white member of one the the groups you list above. The organisation is inclusive to all ethnic groups - About half of the board and a good proportion of the community are also white/British. The group was brought about to discuss issues such as:

    Living in a multicultural society.
    Being British, being Chinese, and being European too?!
    Mixed marriages and inter-racial relationships.
    Mixed race identity.
    Artistic expressions - books / films / art / multimedia etc
    Community & Arts
    Are any of these issues racist?

    3) How many ethnic groups are represented on the BNP board? not many/none

    Clearly the BNP is disingenuous when raising the ‘we are not racist’ angle when the reality is that the organisation IS fundamentally and profoundly based on a misconceived racist principle; the myth of the English Race.

    crab

    Posted by crab | February 11, 2008, 2:06 pm
  60. “Black and Asian people have been living here for hundreds and hundreds of years “??????????? Do not make us laugh. There were a handful of black people here at the turn of the century look through any photo archive will confirm this. Has any one seen a British army of black people in photos in world war 1?
    ALL soldiers were WHITE.
    NO doubt the BBC and Lenny Henry can find ONE picture of a black man some where from that era, But you will NOT convince anyone else how ever much you try to scream and brainwash us

    Posted by x1 | February 12, 2008, 5:00 pm
  61. Thanks for the List, I used it recently in the Telegraph.

    http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/ukcorrespondents/andrewmckie/feb2008/whatbritishlaw.htm?cmd=thanks#comments

    The Commies are usefull idiots, they don’t realise that Communism is simply a stepping stone to World Domination by the ‘Elite’ call them, Bilderbergers, the Illuminati, the International Bankers, whatever.
    Our Parliament is a charade, I’ve often wondered at Various politicians like Blair, How the hell has he got into no 10.
    Well its obvious, they are Puppets, they would never allow someone In no 10 of real intellect, someone who might care for Britain and the British People.
    Parliament, Westminster is a bought and paid for Front, the real Puppetmasters are hidden behind the scenes.
    http://www.savethemales.ca/000275.html

    Posted by royalecraig | February 12, 2008, 5:09 pm
  62. “Black and Asian people have been living here for hundreds and hundreds of years”

    You have been watching too much BBC TV. The way this organisation manages to import blacks and Asians (mostly blacks) into the most unlikely places is truly remarkable - an exercise in re-writing history so that the British people are dispossed of theirs.

    My favourite was the series on Casanova, the costume drama set in the 18th Century. According to this lying piece of BBC propaganda, blacks were to be found in the higher echelons of Italian society at the time. What complete and utter tripe. Or perhaps we are not supposed to notice that they were black? Either way their presence insults our intelligence.

    Queen Elizabeth 1 expelled all blacks from Britain, but there were undoubtedly some in Britain in recent centuries. Dr Johnson had a black servant. Hogarth depicted a black (making a pass at a white girl) in one of his paintings. But blacks (and Asians) were not common and outside London and one or two other ports were never seen.

    Strangers from anywhere were never seen in large parts of the country, so much so that (it is said) citizens of a town in the North East actually hanged a monkey during the Napoleonic wars thinking that is was Frenchman.

    The British were until very recently one of the most racially homogenous societies on earth.

    Posted by lance | February 13, 2008, 12:19 am
  63. this is my first time on this site and i hope someone can relate or be educated by some of my views.in my youth growing up just outside n/london things where very different (and i’m only going back to the 80’s.i could probably count 4 black or asian kids at my school.being raised from a family brought up in the east end it was only normal for me to be told to ‘nip round the paki shop’ or collect the golly wog off of marmalade jars, which i still don’t consider racist.i would love someone from the party to reply to me about this as i have lots to say on the subject.i am an ex soldier who has served in province and bosnia during the early 90’s.i am already flustered trying to write this as like many proud english men i feel let down by those who are chosen to represent g.b for selling us out to the PC and HR scum. like i said first time on here and feel lost

    Posted by jwd | February 13, 2008, 3:41 am
  64. I would rather say that the Brits are ethnically homogenous but sub-racially quite diverse.
    With subrace I am talking about different WHITE subraces.
    e.g. Wales, Cornwall and Devon are known to have large Atlanto-Mediterranean stock within the population stemming from the pre norman and anglo-saxon times.
    ( tall dark sea-faring types)

    While you have a very strong Anglo-Saxon and Viking proportion in East Anglia ( propably the BLONDEST area in Britain), Yorkshire and the Lake District.

    In the Middlands you find extremely large numbers of small build Alpionid types.

    Posted by ItalianBNPSupporter | February 13, 2008, 6:40 am
  65. Well said lance.
    Hartlepool monkey hanging - http://www.thisishartlepool.co.uk/history/thehartlepoolmonkey.asp
    An understandable mistake……

    Posted by trueblueloyalist | February 13, 2008, 7:25 am
  66. I recieved this e-mail recently and thought I would share:

    Very interesting reading!!

    Perhaps we should get rid of the term ‘racist’ all together and just live our lives…

    Michael Richards better known as Kramer from TV’s Seinfeld. This was his defense speech in court after making racial comments in his comedy act. He makes some very interesting points.

    “Proud To Be White

    Someone finally said it.
    How many are actually paying attention to this?

    There are African Americans, Mexican Americans, Asian Americans, Arab Americans, etc. And then there are just Americans.

    You pass me on the street and sneer in my direction. You Call me ‘White boy,’ ‘Cracker,’ ‘Honkey,’ ‘Whitey,’ ‘Caveman’ … and that’s OK.

    But when I call you, Nigger, Kike, Towel head, Sand-nigger, Camel Jockey, Beaner, Gook, or Chink … You call me a racist.

    You say that whites commit a lot of violence against you, so why are the ghettos the most dangerous places to live?

    You have the United Negro College Fund.
    You have Martin Luther King Day.
    You have Black History Month.
    You have Cesar Chavez Day.
    You have Yom Hashoah.
    You have Ma’uled Al-Nabi.
    You have the NAACP.
    You have BET.
    If we had WET (White Entertainment Television) we’d be racists.
    If we had a White Pride Day, you would call us racists.
    If we had White History Month , we’d be racists.
    If we had any organization for only whites to ‘advance’ OUR lives we’d be racists.

    We have a Hispanic Chamber of Commerce, a Black Chamber of Commerce, and then we just have the plain Chamber of Commerce. Wonder who pays for that?
    A white woman could not be in the Miss Black American pageant, but any color can be in the Miss America pageant.
    If we had a college fund that only gave white students scholarships you know we’d be racists.
    There are over 60 openly proclaimed Black Colleges in the US . Yet if there were ‘White colleges’ THAT would be a racist college.
    In the Million Man March, you believed that you were marching for your race and rights. If we marched for our race and rights, you would call us racists.

    You are proud to be black, brown, yellow and orange, and you’re not afraid to announce it. But when we announce our white pride, you call us racists.
    You rob us, carjack us, and shoot at us. But, when a white police officer shoots a black gang member or beats up a black drug-dealer running from the law and posing a threat to society, you call him a racist.

    I am proud.
    But you call me a racist.
    Why is it that only whites can be racists?”

    There is nothing improper about this e-mail.
    Let’s see which of you are proud enough to send it on.

    Posted by Hereward | February 13, 2008, 7:50 am
  67. In response to CAT.
    Isn’t it nice that we the BNP allow a dissenting voice on our web site unlike left leaning trotsky ones.
    But the real reasons that we allow this is , 1 to understand the way that our enemies think, and secondley to have a bloody good laugh.
    You see cat the difference between people that think like you and people that think like us is that the latter even though we detest the multiculti nightmare society we are forced to exist in still enjoy, A SENSE OF HUMOUR. Some thing which is probably an alien conncept to you and your fellow travellers, whom I am lead to believe are a fast dimminishing minority.

    Posted by baz | February 17, 2008, 2:20 pm
  68. I have never really been interested in Politics, and today having had a very lazy day at work with little to do, I went researching teh candidates for the Mayor elections, and thus came upon BNP, always potrayed just as the title thread says “racist”. SO I’ve read on, and It is absolutely shocking, how can it be allowed that all these organisations are not branded racist and yet BNP is even though they all simply care for their own values! It really is sickening, from now on BNP have my full backing, I will always vote for you and I hope that every other British citizen has the common sense to do so as well, there is no way we can allow something like this to happen, we are being bullied in our own country, I am certainly not having this!

    Thanks for your support and welcome aboard, Pbar - Ed

    Posted by Pbar | February 19, 2008, 1:12 pm
  69. I remember when i was at school, myself and my friends were having a day where we felt completely and utterly British, i believe it was the 2003 Rugby World Cup, we began to sing “Rule Britannia” and were quickly told to shut up.

    Yet other cultures were allowed their singsongs!!!

    Ihope this is something the BNP wish to address!

    Posted by The Brave Will Stand | February 23, 2008, 9:44 am
  70. The BNP is not racist, it is culturist. Unlike multiculturalism, culturism recognizes that Britain has a majority culture and coherent history. Culturists, truthfully, acknowledge that Britain is not an Islamic state.

    Multiculturalists always underestimate diversity. Celebrate Diversity means we have to love polygamy and honor killings. Culturism takes diversity seriously. That is logical. The BNP is not racist, it is culturist. Racism is stupid, but culturism is necessary.

    Those who abuse the charge of racism to stop discussion need to be confronted. Race and culture are different. No BNP is not racist. But it cares about Britain’s culture. It acknowledges that Britain has a culture. That is not racist, it is culturist.

    http://www.culturism.us

    Posted by culturist | February 23, 2008, 10:13 pm
  71. culturist

    “It acknowledges that Britain has a culture”

    In his admirable book “English Music” Peter Ackroy explored the themes of history, culture and continuity.

    He put the following words in the mouth of Daniel Defoe:

    “To pallitate the shortness of our lives, and to compensate our brief term in this world, it is fit to have such an understanding of the times past that we may be considered to have dwelled in the same. In such a manner, answering the present with the past, we may live from the begining and in a sense be as old as our country itself”.

    This means our sense of identity is created by our intimate relationship with the history of our nation. It was our ancestors, people like us; who fought enormous odds at Crecy, experienced the exhilarating freedom of reading Tyndale’s Bible for themselves, lit the Armada beacons, marched with Rifleman Harris and the 95th in the Peninsula, endured the bitter and brutal hardship of the early Industrial Revolution, forged the “Workshop of the World”, celebrated the Relief of Mafeking, created the NHS. These were our triumphs, our tragedies, of our people. It is only by such a consciousness that the covenant with those who have gone before, and those who will follow us, can be forged. And if there is no such covenant, to to do our utmost to leave the country perhaps a little better than we found it, then we are living ephemeral lives in the present, which are completely meaningless. I am afraid we see this all round us at the moment.

    History and culture are inextricably intertwined and it is also cultural continuity that enables us to “live from the begining and in a sense be as old as our country itself”. When I listen to the music of Byrd, Tallis, Purcell, Vaughan Williams, Britten, Jethro Tull, Badly Drawn Boy, June Tabor my ear detects similar qualities. I hear a gentle, wistful music, full of melody, thoughtful, at times earthy and lively, at times sad, distinctive, fully expressive of the land and the best qualities of its people. This is a great base on which to build, and I get the same sense from reading Thomas Hardy, the Dorset poet who recreated an historic Wessex out of his experience and imagination. And I ask myself can we not do the same for the indigenous peoples of these islands with all the materials at hand capable of being forged into a revived national consciousness?

    Truly we have sold our birthright for a mess of potage, literally in the case of chicken tikka masala which the late lamented Robin Cook was pleased to describe as the national dish. Surrey Trading standards found that “Fifty-eight out of 102 chicken tikka masala samples contained “illegal and potentially dangerous” levels of colourants”(BBC). This is not a bad metaphor for the pernicious doctrine of multi-culturalism which the current Pope has accurately described as “turning one’s back upon one’s own”. When mass immigration/multi-culti advocates are asked what are the actual benefits of enrichment it never seens to get much further than curry. Black music as pumped out sounds to me discordant, mindless, repetitive and schizophrenic for the most part, certainly of little or no cultural worth. It really is a bit of a struggle to see “enrichment” in any positive light, try as one might.

    In his other excellent book, “Albion”, Ackroyd lists approximately 200 writers, artists, composers and architects - English, Scots, Welsh and Irish - who have pretty much created our national high culture. The first on the list is the Venerable Bede whose “Ecclesisatical History of the English People” has been described as the founding document of the English nation, though thanks to our de-education system and the multi-culturalists who infest it I believe I am on firm ground in asserting that Bede is unknown to all but a relative handful. There are no candidates for outstanding cultural achievement on Ackroyd’s list who were born after 1945 though I would accept that such an exercise is inevitably subjective. But think on that for a moment! If mass immigration, multi-culti and diversity were so great should there not have been numerous stellar cultural contributions resulting from the “vibrant”, “heady” cultural mix the propagandists tell us is so wonderful? Shouldn’t cultural “fusion” be wowing us and knocking us dead left, right and centre? Phoney Snake Oil salesman Tony said a while back that Britain is undergoing a “cultural renaissance, never knowingly undersold on the hyperbole was Tone, but then he rather gave the game away by stating that the heart of the alleged Renaissance lay in the nation’s museums.

    We cannot overcome this sterility, and put to rights the nihilistic despair of our young people, unless we heed the Pope’s advice and stop turning our back on our own history and culture, but turn back to it without delay!

    Posted by neversurrender | February 24, 2008, 11:35 am
  72. Are you serious. Every single one of you are filthy racist and should be ashamed, you all seem judgmental and I must say I would kill myself if I had the beliefs of any of you morons. Being new to this country from the U.S, it makes me want to go back and I know you people are so quick to say,”Go back to you’re own country!” You guys are like the trash of the U.S I am embarrassed for you!

    -

    Oh dear! - Ed

    Posted by youknowwho | February 28, 2008, 1:21 am
  73. “Are you serious.”

    In a word yes, your little outburst cannot go without a response.

    In Britain alien third world populations have been imported over the last 50 years, notably Pakistanis, Bangladeshis and Somalis, who are generally of very low economic and cultural worth and utterly incompatible with us. It is calculated that during the coming century, we, the indigenous people, will become a minority in our country. Given the intrinsic nature of the migration and high breeding rates (and of inbreds in the Pakistani case), this can only result in a failed state hell hole if matters are allowed to go on are they are. If you had taken the trouble to find out a little more you would have known that mass immigration in this country has taken a different course to that in the USA, which has not imported Muslim villagers from such primitive backwaters as Mirpur, although I gather in the States immigration is a deeply controversial subject. Why should we allow ourselves, who have populated our lands for thousands of years, to be dispossessed and destroyed ?

    There is nothing to recommend these people and some of them want to kill us:

    “Another preacher says: ‘The time is fast approaching where the tables are going to turn and the Muslims are going to be in the position of being uppermost in strength and, when that happens, people won’t get killed - unjustly.’.”

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2007/jan/07/broadcasting.channel4

    And as I said above the sum total of cultural “enrichment” in return appears to be curry, not much of a return looked at logically for people who are not merely dangerous and alien but are also a massive economic drain upon our country, Britain, which is clearly flagging economically anyway.

    “Enrichment” is now a word which is now usually employed in a pejorative sense. However when I read War and Peace and Crime and Punishment this was a genuinely enriching experience which made me think a lot about about human behaviour and the nature of history. However to gain this personal enrichment it was not necessary for Britain to be colonised by Russians. Why then should it be a good thing to be colonised by backwater Pakistanis who appear to have little or no high culture at all?

    Finally I would like to have a look at this whole idea of “racism”, which the liberal left forever throws in our faces and which they use in pursuance of their mad schemes to destroy our historic nation.

    Now the term “racism” as formulated was one side of an equation to whit:

    Racism = Prejudice plus Power.

    This cant formulation was concocted in order to show that blacks couldn’t be racist, because they didn’t have any power.

    But it is abundantly clear that the vast majority of the indigenous population doesn’t have any power either, because otherwise how come we have been lumbered with mass alien immigration that we never consented to, nor ever would?

    Britain is a kind of ancient regime with a Constitution “sent into this breathing world scarce half made up, and that …lamely and unfashionable” - that’s from Richard III if any member of the lib left rabble is reading this, because disconnected as they are from our history and culture they can’t be expected to know.

    Britain is not a democracy. The Prime Minister exercises enormous patronage power inserting his creatures to the very depths of the political system like some 18th century monster of “Old Corruption”. Iraq showed Cabinet government to be a mere cipher. Most grotesque of all is the voting system which gave the vile Labour faction a 69 seat majority in 2005 which was a farce because they got this on the basis of 21.69% of the total electorate voting for them. In a recent poll it emerged that 83% of respondents had no trust in politicians at all and only 4% thought they put the national interest first. This is a liberal oligarchy, it is no democracy.

    But then if the people have no power, and going back to the “racism” formula, how then can we be “racist”? In short we can’t, it is a a meaningless piece of abuse flung at us by traitors.

    Forget “racism”, think SURVIVAL!!

    Posted by neversurrender | February 29, 2008, 12:30 pm
  74. Is the BNP racist?

    That we have to answer this question is indicative of the problems that we face because it is not a question that would ever be asked of any of the thousands of charities and organisations that represent people from other ethnic backgrounds. If it is not racist for others to look after their own, why should it be considered racist for us to do the same? The racism is in the accusation - not in our good intentions. We should be judged as others are judged and not be subject to double standards.

    Posted by Shropshire Lass | March 2, 2008, 11:04 pm
  75. Just a few words to “You Know Who”. you say you might come back to the US, feigning mock outrage at the attitudes of members of BNP. Funny, but I believe you remember Mr. Jesse Jackson, Mr. Al Sharpton, Mr. Louis Farakan, Mr. Ted Kennedy, et al. You remind me of the man without a country.

    Well, I have my country, and consider it more than worth fighting for. I’m not moving anywhere, except to be in the face of people with attitudes such as yours. My children and grandchildren have been schooled in the appropriate manner, i.e. love for our Constitution, and it’s Bill of Rights, Liberty, Freedom, and a belief that national government’s obligation to it’s citizens is to protect them from enemies both within, and without.

    We are proud of our British ancestors, and of their history. Let not that history be rewritten, let not it diminish itself from within, let it be what it has always been: A beacon of light for those who seek it’s inviting allure. However, let those who come, do so with a firm resolve to assimilate into the long established order of things. To do less, is to confirm radically different intentions, wouldn’t you say?

    Sorry, my British brethren, you have “You Know Who”, hopefully he/she won’t return to the land of his original roots. Do your best to educate him/her, for we here in the US obviously have failed. Something we do with great facility these days.

    Posted by stevesenior | March 3, 2008, 5:21 am
  76. How on earth can the BNP be called racist? Taking pride in Britain is no form of racism, and wanting a country within which the major cities are not filled to the brim with other ethnic minorities is simply common sense. What kind of welcoming would we get if we were to step into various Eastern European countries, various African countries? More often that not, the British get a terrible reception when they emigrate, yet other ethnic minorities walk into our country, head held high, and they don’t pay taxes and most certainly do not abide with British culture and tradition. Something needs to be sorted and the BNP are the only people capable of doing so, as sadly, the Labour Party and the Conservative Party for a start, are far too wussy to do so.

    Posted by donnieuk | March 3, 2008, 10:13 pm
  77. I do not believe that I am Racist. I currently serve in Her Glorious Majesties Armed services, yet with the up and coming St Georges day I will not be permitted to fly the flag in my barrack block window as it may cause offence to the non-british nationals that work on the base. How can I be branded racist for being patriotic? I have fought for the rights of others in the Balkans, Iraq and recently in Afghanistan, who is going to fight for my rights to fly a simple flag?
    This country needs the BNP. Not tommorrow, NOW!
    Also to show true allegenceto the BNP I have a private plate for sale as I am no longer allowed to take my vehicle onto military bases with it on so. L*** BNP is yours for £800 and it comes with a free Vauxhall Omega and brand new MOT.
    I know this isnt the place to sell but it’s got to go.

    Will also be interested to see how this White Britain season will be on the bbc.

    Posted by RedWhiteandBlue | March 7, 2008, 2:57 pm
  78. I recently heard that foreign prisoners are being offered thousands of pounds to go back to their own country. So if this is the case, does this mean that more and more are going to commit a crime and get offered thousands to get sent home? In this case they’re having a holiday and getting paid for it.

    A Question to the person whose idea this was. Who says that this person, who has made his/her way into our country, won’t be back in 6 months because he/she has spent their (our tax payers) money?

    DARE I ASK WHO IS IT THAT IS GOING TO PAY EACH ONE THIS RIDICULOUS OFFER TO COMMIT A CRIME? (Yes, You the tax-payer!)

    I think it is TIME to stand up for our country and to think of our grand-children and their grand-children and what’s best for us. There’s a saying: “charity starts at home”. I for one know who I’ll be voting for in this coming election. It’s time to look after number one.

    Posted by The Underdog | March 8, 2008, 10:45 pm
  79. Please remove the Jewish ones from that list: Judaism is a religion, not a race.

    Posted by sam | March 11, 2008, 10:17 pm
  80. I agree that looking out for one’s own is not at all racist…especially in one’s own land.

    However I do wonder what the BNP’s polic