- Joe Priestley

The Broken Society

The levels of crime and disorder and the general malaise in this country have forced the establishment to focus its attention less on economic issues and more on the ’state of society’.

 Its favoured position is that if the economy is ‘healthy’ then it will naturally follow that society will be ‘healthy’ too. Clinton’s “.it’s the economy, stupid” and Thatcher’s “.there’s no such thing as society” express more or less the same sentiment and Blair and Brown had no difficulty in adopting both. And they carried a good proportion of the British public with them too; many were convinced to follow the government’s lead and put their own short term economic interest before everything else.

For the past sixty years or so British governments have been managing the country according to the belief that society is a function of the economy, in finest Marxist tradition. Thus they set about creating what they termed ‘a healthy economy’ which they argued would automatically result in ‘a healthy society’.

But their calculations were in a knot. Far from solving society’s ills their management has exacerbated them.

The writing was on the wall ten years ago, but Blair and Brown tried to hold back the tide of chaos by encouraging an orgy of consumer and public spending. They figured that foreign holidays, consumer goods, and ‘investment in vibrant communities’ would take people’s minds off the deterioration of British society and make them live happily ever after. And they did, but not for very long! Meanwhile the massive changes being imposed on the British people in furtherance of this alleged economic ideal were ignored as if they were somebody else’s problem.

Prime Minister Brown hasn’t realised it yet, but Tony Blair handed him the reins just as the wheels are about to come off the cart. The issue of the effect of mass immigration on British society is in the process of overtaking the issue of the economy as the main focus of attention of both politicians and public. Blair must be laughing up his sleeve - he got out just in time.

Gordon Brown was at his most comfortable hiding behind the Treasury’s ledgers, and were it possible he and the rest of the parliamentarians would prefer to spend the rest of their political careers in the comfort of the economy issue where they can bluster to their heart’s content to no effect. The issue of ’society’ is dangerous for politicians on the gravy train; they don’t like it when they have to choose their words so carefully. But events are forcing their hands. Such is the impact that mass immigration is having on the country that it can’t be ignored - much as the politicians would prefer.

Problems don’t go away

Up until recently the LibLabCons have ignored the problems associated with mass immigration, and they did it on the grounds that they didn’t exist, or that they were the ‘figment of racist imaginations’. But problems don’t go away just because they’re swept under the carpet; they tend to accumulate until you start tripping up over them. That’s where we are now - the immigration-fuelled problems affecting our society have become so serious that not even the LibLabCons can ignore them. But talking about an issue and doing something about it are two different things. And the LibLabCons are stuck because the solution to the problems that their policies have caused requires them to accept a set of facts that contradicts their world view. In other words the solution requires honesty; a willingness to admit that not only their previous policies were wrong, but that the philosophy that guided them was wrong also. It requires the rejection of the establishment’s wishful thinking approach to the way of the world and instead demands the acceptance of nature as it is and not as they would wish it to be.

But of course the LibLabCons are morally and intellectually incapable of doing that. So instead of applying facts to the situation and acting accordingly, they resort to breast-beating in an effort to show us how much they care.

Dave hug-a-hoody Cameron is typical of the breed. “How many more parents have to bury their children before we decide to choose a different society?” he sobbed, crocodile tears welling in his eyes. You may think that I am being unkind to Mr Cameron by casting doubt on the sincerity of his concern. He was talking in the aftermath of the murder of 11 year old Liverpool schoolboy Rhys Jones and in the context of what he calls “Britain’s broken society”. But I think that if Mr Cameron was as concerned about the state of British society as he’d have us believe, he’d put his concern for British society before his concern for his political career. And he’s not doing that, is he? But then which LibLabCon politician is?

Gordon Brown’s response to this shift in focus says a lot. He’s trying to take the politics out of politics. He knows that honest argument about the nature of British society will only bring these problems to the fore of the public’s consciousness. And like the rest of the political establishment Brown is wary of being seen to be responsible for the mess that society is in, so naturally he wants to distance himself from the problem. That’s why he’s in favour of a “consensual approach” incorporating politicians of “all persuasions” as a means of addressing the problems we face. The intention quite clearly is to create in the public’s mind the image of establishment politicians standing together in opposition to something that falls under the label “broken society”. Significantly they have yet to establish precisely what is broken, who broke it, how they broke it, and why they broke it. Now why would that be I wonder?

One of the Prime Minister’s bright ideas, he’s an ‘intellectual heavyweight’ you know, is the creation of ‘People’s Courts’ where ‘ordinary people from all walks of life’ get together and come up with ways to tackle society’s problems. Remind me again, what do we pay politicians for?

Conservatives to blame as well

The Tories are just as much to blame. They encouraged mass immigration when they were in government, and like Labour they did it without any mandate from the British people. And like Labour they too sought to silence objection to it. The Tories currently twitter on about lax borders and illegal immigrants, but this is mere posturing. They’re still in favour of mass immigration; it’s just that they’d prefer a better class of immigrant, one who is more inclined to vote Conservative. And of course the LibDems are more or less the same.

As you’d expect Tory leader Cameron differs not a jot from Brown - he too wants to take the politics out of the debate on society. “This is not about politics, it’s not about elections,” he said, as if the problems we face have nothing to do with politics and politicians.

Cameron wonders what it will take “.before we decide to choose a different path”. He says, “It’s up to us to decide what kind of society we want”. He adds, “We should recognise our obligations”, and that “We should ask ourselves what is going wrong.”

Is Cameron for real? Can he really be that out of touch? Does he not know that ‘we’ can have the society ‘we’ want only if it coincides with the society ‘he’ wants, in other words with the kind of society Cameron and the rest of the political establishment want. And that is precisely the problem!

Cameron and Brown’s transparency is an insult to our intelligence.

The state of the nation is a function of the politics of the political elite. How can any politician argue otherwise, especially in this country where the political establishment seeks to govern every aspect of our lives? And whether they like it or not, the nature of society today is their responsibility, created by their policies.

Since the end of WWII Britain’s political establishment has consistently failed in its duties to the British people. Instead of governing according to the harsh realities of life it has governed according to wishful thinking; theory has replaced fact. Guided by the idea of the equality of man, successive British governments paved the way for mass immigration by arguing that it would have no significant impact on British society - as indeed it wouldn’t have if all men were equal.

Of course the reality is the exact opposite of what the politicians have been telling us; far from having no impact, mass immigration has changed British society out of all recognition. So much so that it is fast becoming the issue of our time.

In their panic politicians are now arguing the impossible; both that mass immigration has had no effect on society and that it has changed it for the better - and all the while contriving new laws to compensate for its adverse effects. Make no mistake; the collapse of society is due to mass immigration and to the changes that the establishment has had to make to our way of life in order to accommodate alien ways of life. The combined forces of the Libs, Labs, and Cons facilitated mass immigration, silenced objection, and browbeat the British people into accepting their argument that mass immigration has greatly improved our economy, society, and way of life.

And look at them now, these great leaders, these innovators, these visionaries, blinking in the harsh light of day, nonplussed that their grand scheme hasn’t worked out as they had predicted it would. Alas vision is not the same as seeing.

But the political establishment can’t say they weren’t warned about the dangers of mass immigration. Lots of people warned them, and many others are still warning them. And those whose warnings they can’t ignore they intimidate into silence or throw in jail.

But the evidence is clear. The LibLabCons are responsible for the mess that has been caused by mass immigration. They opened Britain’s borders and they used every arm of state to encourage the flow of aliens into our midst and to silence any objection to it. These are not the actions of democrats; they are the actions of totalitarians. Yet now, when it’s obvious to even the most head-in-the-clouds libdim that the multiracial utopia hasn’t happened, they’re acting all innocent. As if the approaching chaos has nothing to do with them, like it suddenly appeared on the horizon, out of the blue, without any warning.

Too late

The genie’s out of the bottle. The powers that be have tried every trick to deflect attention away from the impact that mass immigration has had on British society. Nothing is too cynical for them. Nothing is too evil. What kind of ‘leaders’ are these LibLabCons? Rather than face up to the problems that they’ve caused, they’ve blamed us for them! Those who oppose mass immigration are blamed for the problems caused by mass immigration. Immigrant ghettos are blamed on inhospitable Britons. High levels of immigrant crime are blamed on ‘institutionally racist’ police. Immigrant failure in the education system, you guessed right, it’s the fault of the racist education system. etc, etc, etc ad infinitum. That’s our leaders for you. They are cowards who want the rewards of power without the responsibilities that go along with it. And so every problem thrown up by their betrayal of the British people they blame on the British people - we’re not doing whatever it is that we’re supposed to do to create the multiracial multicultural multilingual heaven on earth that they had planned for us. Maybe that’s why they hate us so much.

It was David Cameron who asked when we’ll choose a different path, but the question could just as easily have been asked by Gordon Brown or by Ming Campbell - or for that matter by any of the parasites that inhabit the Houses of Parliament. But our question back to them surely is to ask why are they asking us? They’re the ones that decide which path we’ll take, and without any consultation too. And they’re the ones that set us on the path to destruction - because they knew best.

Yet now they’re beating their breasts and wailing “Where did we go wrong?” But they’re not talking the royal ‘we’ here. Oh no, in fact they’re talking the exact opposite, let’s call it the common ‘we’. Because when they ask ‘Where did we go wrong?” they’re not asking where they went wrong, they’re asking where we went wrong - as in us, the British people. It’s our fault you see, or at least that’s how they want to play it. They can’t blame the immigrants and they won’t blame themselves so they blame us.

What broke our society was doing it the Brown, Cameron, Campbell way. Whether it can be fixed or not remains to be seen, but what is certain is that the LibLabCons can’t fix it. They broke society because they applied the equality of man idea in managing it - and no matter how bad things get they’re not going to abandon what is after all the corner stone of their way of viewing the world. So all they’ve got to offer is more of the same; more deviousness, more ducking of responsibility, more shifting of blame, and more treachery.

Share this page:

What do these buttons do?

© 2008, The British National Party News , PO Box 287, Waltham Cross, Herts, EN8 8ZU. Telephone: 0871 050 0232